This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparitive Critique Of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment And "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources Of Sadism" By Marianne Szegedy Maszak.

1529 words - 6 pages

Put in the right circumstances, every human being has the potential to be a sadist. In "The Stanford Prison Experiment", Phillip G. Zimbardo examines how easily people can slip into roles and become sadistic to the people around them, even going so far as to develop a sense of supremacy. He does this by explaining the results of his experiment that he created to understand more about the effects that imprisonment has on prisoners, and how a prison environment affects the guards who work there. In her article "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism", Marianne Szegedy-Maszak looks at the Abu Ghraib atrocities and the possible reasons why "normal" people turned into sadists who committed unfathomable acts of torture. Although Szegedy-Maszak and Zimbardo both suggest that every person has the potential to be a torturer, Zimbardo's experiment adds specificity to Szegedy-Maszak's claims. Szegedy-Maszak speaks generally about dehumanization, whereas Zimbardo uses his experiment to delve deeper into despotism and the role it plays in prisons; the evidence of dehumanization in prison environments is further complicated by the notion of internal and external attitudes.Szegedy-Maszak and Zimbardo recognize that every human being can become someone who delights in the pain of others. Dehumanization is a key element in this change from a caring person to a sadist. According to Robert Okin, a professor of psychiatry, dehumanization allows people to "sever any empathetic human connection" (Szegedy-Maszak 304) they may have felt towards a person. Through interviews and studies, Zimbardo discovered that prisoners often report feeling dehumanized; his goal was to incorporate this feeling into his prison if possible. While conducting his experiment, he saw a degree of dehumanization occur that was astounding for the short period of time that the study was carried out. Szegedy-Maszak says that authorization leads to routinization, which ultimately leads to dehumanization. She claims that these three traits were present at Abu Ghraib.In Zimbardo's experiment, a group of twenty-one college-age males were put into a mock prison located in the basement of the Stanford University psychology building. The people chosen to participate were evaluated to make sure they were "normal" men. Participants were then divided into two groups, guards and prisoners, by the flip of a coin. The prisoners were assigned three to a cell and hidden microphones recorded their conversations. The guards were informed that they were responsible for maintaining order in the prison. The first day of the experiment was relatively uneventful; however, by the second day tensions had arisen due to a rebellion and relations between the prisoners and guards progressively worsened. Everyone involved in the experiment became so engrossed in their roles and their behavior became so disturbing that the two week study had to be concluded after only six days.Szegedy-Maszak states, "In Vietnam the...

Find Another Essay On Comparitive Critique of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment and "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism" by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak.

Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation Critique

893 words - 4 pages ," (Zimbardo, 2007, p. 4). The Stanford Prison Experiment is compared to the Abu Ghraib situation, and also discussed are the implications of this research to the criminal justice system. The problems specified in the article addresses the social power of groups and as to whether a person could be influenced to exert power over someone else. The experiment called for twenty-four student participants to act as either a prisoner or a guard in the "prison

The Standrof Prison Experiment Essay

588 words - 3 pages experience the students revealed no lasting negative affects but learned a lesson. They should never underestimate the power of a bad situation that overpowered the personality of even the most behave and smart student, a system that made the situation possible by creating a realistic prison. The experiment presented raises many questions about how well we know ourselves whether we appreciate the power of external forces. The prison experiment deals

Stanford Prison Experiment

772 words - 4 pages Gandhi once said “Our thoughts become our words, our words become our actions, our actions become our character, our character becomes our destiny.” That very quote was proven in the 1973 Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo. Zimbardo placed an ad in the newspaper asking for young males to par take in his experiment with in return getting paid $15 a day. Out of 75 volunteers 24 were chosen as participants. Zimbardo randomly

Stanford Prison Experiment

1338 words - 5 pages When put into an authoritative position over others, is it possible to claim that with this new power individual(s) would be fair and ethical or could it be said that ones true colors would show? A group of researchers, headed by Stanford University psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo, designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role-playing either as prisoners or guards to test the power of

Comparitive Critique of Doris Lessing's article "Group Minds" and Solomon Asch's experiment

2129 words - 9 pages Social influences shape every person's practices, judgments, and beliefs. (Asch 306) In "Opinions and Social Pressure", Solomon Asch examines how individuals tend to conform to a group or majority. He does this by explaining the results of his experiment that he devised to observe to what extent conformity occurs. In her essay titled "Group Minds", Doris Lessing claims that as a society we have enough knowledge about conformity to do something

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Philip Zimbardo

1937 words - 8 pages nailed to the floor and a metal toilet which is also nailed to the floor. They close the metal bars behind you and it’s loud. Then all you can hear are the chains of your neighbors. All of this, and you're innocent. These are the events that happened to twenty four college males who participated in the Stanford Prison Experiment. This is just one example of many controversial psychological experiments. Certain psychological experiments

Comparing Views on Stanley Milgram's Experiment on Obedience

1168 words - 5 pages Milgram’s stimulated the creation of several responsive articles. Two articles that respond to this experiment are authored by Diane Baumrind and Ian Parker. These two authors attempt to review the methods, results, and ethical issues of Milgram’s experiment. “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments of Obedience” was written by Diane Baumrind. Baumrind is a psychologist at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Taking a Deeper Look

1023 words - 5 pages . The volunteers were unaware of the process of the experiment, let alone what they were getting themselves into. They were in shock about what was happening to them. Once taken into the facility, the experimenters had set up as their own private jail system; the twenty-four volunteered individuals were split up into two different groups (Stanford Prison Experiment). By the flip of a coin, 12 members were assigned to act as prison guards and the

The Stanford Prison Experiment - Choosing to Remain A Prisoner

1015 words - 5 pages Allowing & Choosing to be a Prisoner The Stanford Prison Experiment was a great example of how people can become imprisoned by accepting the roles others assigned to them. Also, some of them remained prisoners because they did not want to be scrutinized by the other participants for trying to be different. Furthermore, the experiment demonstrated how people will go along with something even if they don’t want to. As children most of us are

Crossing The Line Question Posed By Instructor: Describe how The Stanford Prison Experiment relates to an event in history

1406 words - 6 pages in action. So what would people who had undergone stringent psychological evaluations and testing be doing torturing people in the most inhumane ways imaginable? Was it just a few bad apples, or could it be something more? We can get a better understanding of what happened at Abu Ghraib by taking a closer look at The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo in 1971. In this experiment a group of young men answered an ad in a

Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay: The Safety of Nations or the Rights of Few?

1107 words - 5 pages Ritchie 1 The hood goes on and darkness closes in, the snide laughter of soldiers can be heard, the buzzing of the electricity running through the wires grows closer, the growling of dogs sounds as they stand nearby, ready to attack--these are the haunting sights and sounds remembered by detainees from Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay prison camps. Located 20 miles west of Baghdad, the 280-acre prison camp of Abu Ghraib housed as many as 3,800

Similar Essays

Summary Of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment And "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources Of Sadism" By Marianne Szegedy Maszak

778 words - 3 pages In “The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism” by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, Szegedy-Maszak says that rationalizing the stark change in mentality of the young American soldiers who kept watch over the Iraqi prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison would be a very challenging task. Some may blame inexperience or dereliction of duty by commanding officers. Others may say that stress caused by living in a war zone was responsible. However

This Paper Covers The Scandal Of Prisoner Abuse In Abu Ghraib In Iraq

896 words - 4 pages environment where soldiers are placed in a position of power, it is understandable to see them turn into sadists. "Abu Ghraib also has three traits the psychologist Herbet Kelman has described as necessary for torture; authorization, routinization, and dehumanization" (Szegedy-Maszak 1). This shows that soldiers in Iraq are capable of becoming sadists and abusing prisoners without any orders from a higher official.The scandal going on in Iraq right

The Ethics Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

941 words - 4 pages worked in a real prison. As for the prisoners, real police surprised them at their homes and arrested them outside where others could see as if they were really criminals. They were then blindfolded and taken to the mock prison in the basement of a Stanford Psychology building that had been decorated to look like a prison where guards fingerprinted, deloused, and gave prisoners a number which they would be called by for the rest of the experiment

The Implications Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1115 words - 4 pages shock if encouraged by a figure of authority. This coincides with a popular explanation from soldiers who have committed war crimes "I was just following orders". Whilst studying this thought provoking topic I have composed several ideas on how humanity can develop from the concepts learnt from the Stanford prison experiment. The experiment put good people in an evil environment and the results showed the people became evil