Consequentialism: Principia Ethics By G.E. Moore

1937 words - 8 pages

People have opinions and ideas when it comes to ethical dilemmas. There are many examples: The debate on abortion, the trolley problem, and moral absolutism, to name just a few. In all of these examples it appears that emotion and feelings will, at some point, override an important ethical decision that needs to be made. An important factor of an ethical dilemma is how and when it might appear. Some dilemma's, like the debate on abortion, can appear in a way that there is time to talk through all options and available ethical concepts. In this type of dilemma it is possible to see how moral rules and ethical theories can be discussed and a decision made through compromise. In contrast, when a situation that poses dire ethical consequences calls for a moral action there must be a solution that is grounded in moral principle and that can be accessed quickly and efficiently producing the most desirable results. The principal that would seem the best candidate in these situations is consequentialism.
To best define consequentialism the famous English philosopher G.E. Moore declared in his book Principia Ethics that “Acts are morally right just because they maximize the amount of goodness in the world.” Moore believed that if you failed to accept the idea that it was right to maximize good, you did not know what you were talking about (297). What is unique about consequentialism is that it asks us to act in a way where the greatest benefit is made for the greatest number of people. Consequentialism asks us to look at the consequences of our actions. If the result will produce the most good, then the end justifies the means. The direct opposite of consequentialism is the ethical theory of deontology. Deontology suggests that no matter how beneficial or good a decision might be some choices cannot be justified morally. To best define the deontological approach to a dilemma, there is no firmer ground than that of St. Thomas Aquinas. In the Summa Theologica, Thomas presents the idea that if we intend to do harm either through the means in which we get to the end, or by the end itself we set ourselves to evil, and these kinds of actions are not allowed (Summa, Question 13). Looking at ethics from this perspective can also be called doing harm versus allowing harm to happen. This theory of deontology holds that moral obligations arise from God's commands.
One of the best acted out examples of how consequentialism decided a critical ethical dilemma and directly clashed with deontological ethics was in the 2003 “Battlestar Galactica (TV miniseries).” In the first episode, the Cylons (robots engineered by humans) return 40 years after a truce was reached in a war that pitted them against their human creators. In this war, the Cylons launched an attack against the unsuspecting humans with the goal of exterminating the human race. This attack wiped out virtually all of humanity and rendered the military industrial complex ineffective. Luckily for humankind...

Find Another Essay On Consequentialism: Principia Ethics by G.E. Moore

ethics Essay

619 words - 3 pages Consequentialism and deontology are two different theories concerning with morality. Consequentialism believes in the concept of the end justifies the means. On the other hand, deontology does not believe in the concept of the ends justifies the means. It believes that right actions are defined by duty. Deontology is the opposite of consequentialism when it comes to moral ethics, making it the better approach. Deontology is a non

Ethical Perspectives Essay

2332 words - 9 pages , Larry, & Moore, Michael, (2007). Deontological Ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from IDRA (Intercultural Development Research Association). (2007). Race Equity and Desegregation Terminology. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, (2006). Consequentialism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism: The Elements of Moral Philosophy

1590 words - 6 pages considered evidence for the theory’s value. Hence, as we can only judge a theories value by its premise, I will argue that consequentialism is derived from a sound premise, while non-consequentialism is based on an unfounded assertion. Before we consider specific situations, it is important to understand fully the stance of non-consequentialism and consequentialism. Non-consequentialism suggests that there are certain actions that are inherently

Philosophical Concepts of Value

2167 words - 9 pages . Because non-naturalists maintain that values are intuited through emotions, rather than revealed by scientific methods, they are frequently called "intuitionists". Most prominent among them are Plato, G.E. Moore, Scheler, and Nicolai Hartman; Moore's Principia ethica is a particularly well known example of non-naturalistic cognitivism. Naturalistic cognitivism: According to the naturalists, ethical knowledge can in principle be revealed and

The Engaged Professional

1817 words - 7 pages rule would extend to apply on a more universal level (Alexander & Moore, 2007). Based upon this framework the teacher ought to decline the offer of the proposal. By accepting the proposal there are social contracts being broken such as the teacher’s Duty of Care and Code of Conduct, and the act of acceptance would suggest that it is universally acceptable to discriminate against someone based on their weight. The possibilities arising from

How Ethics Impact our Judgement

1265 words - 5 pages which should not be over looked. In contrast to deontological ethics, consequentialism allows actions to be more flexible as a fundamental aspect to this theory is that the moral rightness and wrongness of acts are determined by the consequences the action creates (Darwall, 2003). Given the circumstance which are presented in case study one it could be suggested a consequentialist would be willing to grant Sean an extension as according to

European enlightenment

613 words - 2 pages goals of rational man were considered to be knowledge, freedom, and happiness. Three critically important factors to this movement were: a revulsion against monarchical power and clerical absolutism; a new freedom of publishing and rise of a new public and secular culture; impact of the scientific revolution, particularly with Isaac Newton's book, Principia (1867).When Principia was published, censorship or imprisonment for ideas disliked by the

Pros and cons of consenquetialism - Philosophy - Essay

1453 words - 6 pages duty does not condemn them. What Mill means by this is that if individuals have the understanding of the moral ethics of Consequentialism, they are then able to choose their actions based mostly on what would benefit them. Mill provides a great example of this (Pg6), where a person saves another from drowning, he then says that the action taken is morally right whether it was based on duty or on the hope that he would get paid for his actions

Ethics and Utilitarianism

1395 words - 6 pages ethics is, in the simplest form, the search for ideal rules to test proper behaviour. In relation there are several strategies used to determine the proper behaviour, one is consequentialism. According to consequentialism is that an action is determined to be right or wrong based solely on the outcome of the action; If the outcome has more positive effects than negative ones, it is believed that the action is good and vise versa. Consequentialist

Ethics Case Study

1458 words - 6 pages focus ethical frameworks that have been use to provide my final recommendations for this scenario are Consequentialism, Non-Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics. Consequentialism is an action-based decision making framework which determines whether an act is right or wrong based on the consequences that occur from them. Decisions are considered to be effective when the negative consequences are eliminated or minimised (Baron, Pettit

Setting Up A Moral System

578 words - 2 pages Non-consequentialism.Consequentialism is best described by utilitarianism, where decisions are based on theconsequences of the outcome of the decision made. On the other hand, non-consequentialismis best described as an ethical theory that is based not on the consequences of theaction, but on some higher moral standard that is placed upon them. Examples ofnon-consequentialism are Kant's Duty Ethics and Divine Command Theory. The conflictbetween

Similar Essays

Proof Of An External World, By G.E. Moore

1233 words - 5 pages excerpt “Proof of an External World” from his essay of the same name, G.E. Moore responds to the skeptic’s argument by attempting to prove the existence of external objects. There are four parts to this paper. Firstly, I will explain Moore’s overall argumentative strategy and how he considers his proof to be rigorous and legitimate. Then, I will present Moore’s proof of the existence of an external world. Thirdly, I will discuss the responses that

Commiting The Naturalistic Fallacy Essay

677 words - 3 pages and its error in definition, make the naturalistic fallacy a fallacy. Works Cited "Appeal to Nature." Logical Fallacy:. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Mar. 2014. Boniolo, Giovanni, and Gabriele De Anna. Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print. "Principia Ethica (1903)." PRINCIPIA ETHICA (1903) by G. E. Moore. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2014. Schroeder, Doris. "Evolutionary Ethics." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. N.p., 12 July 2005. Web. 20 Mar. 2014.

Counseling Ethics Essay

1462 words - 6 pages META-ETHICS: Meta-ethics is the branch of ethics that seeks to understand the nature of ethical properties, and ethical statements, attitudes, and judgments. Meta-ethics as a discipline gained attention with G.E. Moore's famous work Principia Ethica from 1903 in which Moore first addressed what he referred to as the naturalistic fallacy. Moore's rebuttal of naturalistic ethics, his Open Question Argument sparked an interest within the analytic

Agent Alienation In Consequentialism Essay

1633 words - 7 pages Railton’s argument that consequentialism need not deny the agent integrity. I will then consider an objection to Railton’s argument, and then evaluate a possible Railtonian response. Williams identifies himself as a non-consequentialist not by offering a conflicting theory, but by pointing out the flaws of consequentialism. The crux of his argument is his rejection of what he calls negative responsibility: “for consequentialism, all