Constitution Guarding Against Tyranny Essay

678 words - 3 pages

With the birth of a new nation, and a goal of being completely independent of Britain, many protocols needed to be set straight. Most of the rules are written directly into our Constitution and have a main purpose; to establish a democracy in the most efficient form possible. But without rules to ensure democracy, how do we know that the formal document actually guards our new nation from tyrannical rule? There are a plethora of statements that support it, but the four major ones are big vs. small states, separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. The Framers of the Constitution prevented tyrannical rule by developing methods that satisfied the larger states while also making the smaller states happy and equal. The Framers also developed a method that split the government up into three branches with a system that checks and reviews everything they do. Finally, they ensured the federal government did not gain too much power by splitting it up with state governments.
Satisfying both large states and small states were one of the main goals by the Framers to prevent tyranny. They did this by the simplest form possible. Since the smaller states usually had less population, the larger states would win over the say in House of Representatives. But with the Senate of each state being equal at a number of two, the smaller states got their say in it as well. This prevented tyranny by allowing smaller states equal opportunity in the government by the Senate and allowing the big states to get their House number up by their population and size. It also prevented tyranny, since smaller states got equal say, by not allowing larger states to control the smaller ones, or even the larger states gaining so much power that they would split from our unified states.
It is easy to say that tyrannical rule would be present today if Separation of Powers was created by the Framers. Separation of powers was a system that split the...

Find Another Essay On Constitution Guarding Against Tyranny

U.S. Constitution Essay

644 words - 3 pages In the year of 1787, our founding fathers developed a document that framed the laws and rights given to the citizens of the United States. This document, the Constitution, was created in an attempt to guard the nation from tyranny. Through the ideas of federalism, the separation of powers, checks and balances, and small state- large state compromise, the Constitution was able to successfully guard against tyranny in the United States. First

Constitution Essay

895 words - 4 pages How much do you know about tyranny? In May of 1787, 55 men came together, confronted with the reality that their current Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was not working. The situation was the result of the desire to form a tyranny free government. Now they would have to create a new stronger government that could also protect against tyranny. Three ways the Constitution defends against tyranny are federalism, separation of powers

The Genius of the American Constitution

1154 words - 5 pages against all kinds of tyranny whether it be of a few, the many or majority, or even a single individual. This seemed virtually insurmountable a task to accomplish but was ultimately achieved. The Constitution guards against tyranny by having a central and state government that cannot overrule or have more power over the other, establishing the separation of powers to keep anyone from abusing it, and having a system of checks and balances in place

The Genius of the American Constitution

1295 words - 6 pages , they instead created a new and revolutionary government that was strong, powerful and protected the people against tyranny. The constitution guarded against tyranny by the separation of powers, a system of checks and balances, and by establishing federalism. The problem of tyranny can exist even within a democracy when “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many…may

Constitutional Law

1746 words - 7 pages against a written constitution. The main argument for a written constitution is that it provides clear rules and acts as a limiting factor on government. On the other hand the arguments against a written constitution are that it is rigid and could lead to a democratic deficit due to judicial tyranny. This essay has argues that the UK should not adopt a written constitution because in modern times and scenarios e.g. terrorism, it is better to have

There is now an overwhelming case for adopting a UK codified constitution - Portsmouth grammar school - essay

1155 words - 5 pages constitutions. A second argument against adopting a codified constitution is judicial tyranny and democratic rule in the UK. The UK’s long-period of unbroken democratic rule is often seen as a strength of the uncodified constitutional system. In the UK’s uncodified constitution, supreme constitutional authority is vested in the elected House of Commons. Changes to the constitution therefore come about due to democratic pressure. For example, the

The Supreme Court: Protector of Civil Liberties - UBC/ POLI 101 - Research paper

1964 words - 8 pages in Canada is responsible for interpreting the constitution, reviewing laws, and ruling on cases. In addition, the Supreme Court is a place of impartiality where judges works to protect the rights and freedoms of Canadians by guarding the rule of law in our constitution, which states that everyone is subject to the law and no one is above it. The act of guarding this principle is achieved through judicial independence

The Federalist/Anti Federalist Debate

1951 words - 8 pages -Federalists have for and against the Constitution? The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debate is focused on two main points: the distribution of power between the Union and the States and the institutions and their attachments to People's Rights. 2/7 The distribution of power between the National Government and the States is certainly the major controversial point among the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debate. While the Federalists argued for a strong

The Development to The United States Constitution

1546 words - 6 pages and democracy. The United States had recently spent eight years fighting against the tyranny of King George III, and they had no desire to replicate the monarchical system with the new Constitution. Nonetheless, the Nationalists had been complaining for years about the instability caused by annual elections and term limits (Text, 107). Therefore, the drafters of the constitution established the office of a president who would be elected by the

The Structure of the New Hatian Governance

964 words - 4 pages of 1805 goes into more detail on the powers of the emperor and defines the autocrat as supreme leader will special titles being given to specifically Jacques Dessalines. The Haitian Declaration of Independence describes the efforts of the revolutionary generals as a fight against the tyranny of France pointing out that not enough has been done to provide happiness to the people. Although it may not seem obvious for those recently freed from

Our Constitution

1224 words - 5 pages constitutionality of laws based on their interpretation of the Constitution. This encourages government by having wise forward-looking statesman because officials know that there legislation can be checked by the supreme court. Judicial review allows for the continuous use of the Constitution as our governing document. Those who oppose the Constitution believe that it gives to much power to the federal government, doesn't protect against tyranny of

Similar Essays

How The Constitution Guards Against Tyranny

722 words - 3 pages Philadelphia to draft a better constitution. One of the topics that concerned many was how the constitution would guard against tyranny. Madison and the other delegates wanted a Constitution that would be strong enough to unite the states and the people together without letting there be one person or group gain too much power. They achieved this in several ways. Today, the U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny by including a separation of

The Key To The Protection Against Tyranny In The American Constitution

1538 words - 7 pages , preventing the balance of power and thus allowing tyranny of one branch. Checks and balances placed the branches of government in a self-regulating web, guarding against tyranny of one branch. The Constitution of the United States created a triangle of interconnected branches, with controls on and from each. For example, the legislative branch could confirm Supreme Court nominations and could impeach and remove judges from office. The judicial branch

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Dekalb Early College Academy, 9th Grade Essay

904 words - 4 pages Coleman 3 Sydney Coleman Fourqurean Civics 2 24 August 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? When many imagine the United States, they envision a place of freedom and choice. How did it get that way? After the American Revolution, it was up the citizens of the newly formed country to create a government system that would not support the possibility tyranny, a cruel and oppressive rule. The first written document stating the

This Is How The Constitution Guarded Against Tryanny

969 words - 4 pages complete power the nation would be weak and not have any power or say in what happens in America. Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and representatives of congress are the main protectors of the constitution that guard us against tyranny. They simply just made it into three branches and kept them far apart, but not to far to where they would have no constitutional say over one another. Federalism is