Constitutional Differences Essay

2104 words - 8 pages

It can be said that the most important difference between constitutions is their strength over the rule of law and the rigidity of the fundamental laws and principles enshrined in them. Some constitutions are amended by supermajorities of Parliament, while some require refendums and others put complete legislative power in the parliament. The one feature the three constitutions I will discuss have in common is their liberal democratic nature, but the rigidity of their fundamental laws and how they are amended are all very different.

I will explain and analyse the constitutions of Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom, three constitutions that have varying degrees of rigidity and I will offer theories on why these constitutions are framed the way they are.

The German Constitution

The German Constitution knows as The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany is a higher law constitutional model that was formally approved on May 8th 1949 and came into effect on May 23rd. ”Chiefly influenced by the grim lessons on the immediate past” (Jeffrey 1999, p34), the occupying Allies, keen to ensure Germany would never be in the position to start another great war, set about changing the internal structure of German. Initially only including the states of West Germany within the Federal Republic However, within a few years it had come to include all of West Germany and “the proclamation of the Basic Law marked the beginning of an unprecedented era of constitutionalism in Germany” (John and Koch 2009). During the Constitutional conference of 1948 major failings in the Constitution of the Weimar Republic were identified, which eventually “allowed the democratic system to be dismantled from within by extremist forces” (John and Koch 2009) and coupled with no proper legal oversight, this enabled Hitler to concentrate absolute power in himself.

With these failings in mind, the members of the Constitutional Convention attempted to create a better, more resilient constitutional system with the result being an outstanding achievement in the history of constitutional assemblies (John and Koch 2009). Such flaws in the Constitution on the Weimar Republic and the events that followed which were ultimately facilitated by these flaws were very much in the consciousness of those charged with drafting the Basic Law. For example, the position of President was significantly weakened along with a strengthening of the powers of the Chancellor with this being “devised to countervail any development into a presidential dictatorship capable of side lining the federal Parliament as had occurred in the final years of the Weimar Republic” (John and Koch 2009). The Basic Law was framed in such a way that it came to be one of the most rigid constitutions in the world to protect against any potential undermining. Features that cannot be changed are the respect for human rights, the rule of law and the federal, democratic and social nature of the German state.


Find Another Essay On Constitutional Differences

Monarchs vs. Dictators Essay

825 words - 4 pages Monarchs and Dictators are very similar but yet very different. A monarch is defined as “a person who reigns over a kingdom or empire: as, a sovereign ruler or a constitutional king or queen” by Webster’s Dictionary. A monarch rules over lands while following a set of guidelines that are set by a constitution, law body, or the people themselves. Dictators on the other hand, are defined as “a person who rules a country with total authority and

Citizens from France and The Netherlands rejected the Constitutional Treaty in 2005 referenda and Irish citizens rejected the Lisbon treaty in a 2008

1209 words - 5 pages There have always been controversies surrounding the treaties in the post-Maastricht era. Such practices did not pass by the Constitutional and Lisbon treaties. The rejection of these two treaties had a major political impact on Europe as a whole. 29th of May 2005, was a memorable day in the history of the European Union. That particular date is connected with the referendum in France, regarding the ratification of the Constitutional Treaty and

A Critical Review of Peter H. Russell's Essay "Can the Canadians be a Sovereign People?"

1075 words - 4 pages problem with it though, is that "not all Canadians have consented to form a single people in which a majority or some special majority have a right to act and conclude the rest" It is difficult to create a nation state and have sovereignty when a defined nation is not present. Canadians differences on fundamental political questions and collective identity present a continuous problem for Canadian sovereignty.Russell argues that there was not a trace

Transformation of the West

720 words - 3 pages In the late 18th century, both France and the Thirteen Colonies endured revolutions that resulted in the decline of powerful monarchies, the rise of democracy, and the switch of absolute monarchies to constitutional states and republics. Both France and America became unified under an over-arching ideology and the power of the national state became elevated. Although the embracement of Enlightenment ideals and the suffering from social and

Interpretation of Law ( Rules ) - Law School - Assignment

849 words - 4 pages commonness or commonality. his does not, however, come as a surprise, since both ordinary statutes and the Constitution are enacted law texts, which means they belong to the same text genre(s). As a result, the logic that Differences and Similarities Between Constitutional Interpretation and Ordinary Statutory Interpretation, is that the strategies and justifications for their interpretation will also have much in common. Nevertheless, statutes

Large Constitutional Republican System

1646 words - 7 pages authority. According to Madison’s definition, factions occur because of differences in opinions and interests among people. People with the same interests tend to have ties with one another. These ties form groups. Then forming groups based on similar interests leads to factions. James Madison states, as long as there are different interests within any society factions are predicted and inevitable. Factions tend to protect and maintain those

Causes of the Civil War

539 words - 2 pages The Civil War is caused by at least four main reasons between differences in the North and the South- constitutional disputes (federal versus states’ rights), economic differences between the industrializing North and the agricultural South, political extremism on both sides, and slavery. Ah, slavery, the growing moral issue in the North versus the defensive reason in the South. Slavery, the underlying issue of all conflicts and


2303 words - 10 pages societies regardless of cultural differences (Crick 29). In addition, since the dynamics of society suggest that the constitution evolves according to the changes in society, which is significant when ensuring that constitutional principles correspond to social conventions. According to the Greeks, democracy is defined as Deme Kratia, which means Rule by the people. In 508 BC, Athenians established the first democratic constitutional. In fact: in


2079 words - 8 pages world ("Arab Spring").. Not only dictatorships and absolute monarchies lacking democracy have been affected by the protests, also democratic governments - such as those with constitutional/ parliamentary monarchies as Spain - have been subject of debate. Monarchies were once the most common form of government in the world; however, at present, they are considered obsolete and are sentenced to disappear in favor of the Republics, as the ongoing

American History,The Reform Party

856 words - 3 pages Sara Fletcher7-28-00American HistoryMr. MeltzerTitle: The Reform PartyThe Reform Party is one of the most know third parties in the world. Like other parties it has Constitutional Principles, Budgets, Entitlements, Tax Reforms, Ethics, Term Limits, and Campaign Finance Reforms, Trade - Policy's, Foreign - Policy's, Education, Health Care, and the Environment. The Reform Party is very small; it is so small that people that are in it never get

Constitutional Monarchy and Malaysia

2693 words - 11 pages Question 1 Discuss the concept of constitutional monarchy with reference to Malaysia i. Constitutional monarchy in general Constitutional monarchy can be described as a form of government in which a monarch acts as the head of state but functions within the parameters or guidelines of a written and/or unwritten constitution. Although the government may function officially in the monarch’s name, the monarch does not set public policies or

Similar Essays

The Rise Of Universal Liberal Values?

1111 words - 4 pages do not condone wanton destruction of human life, other of the liberal constitutional rights may be of lesser or no importance. If an electorate chooses, and especially if it subsequently re-elects, an illiberal regime, then by what right do Westerners intervene, either directly or by soft power? Zakaria himself recognizes these very cultural differences (150) that undermine the universal applicability of the rights he trumpets. If this

Constitutional Questions Essay

813 words - 4 pages Yes, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was essential to preserve the Union, as the Articles of Confederation did a meager job establishing a stable America. Only a handful of people from the entire nation were pleased with the issues addressed in the Articles of Confederation. This document didn’t unite the nation, but created more differences among the people. The Articles of Confederation failed to properly allocate power between Congress

How Did The Constitutional Crisis Affect The Unionist Alliance?

553 words - 2 pages personal but also based on deep political differences, was reciprocated'This suggests the tension between many peers had been brewing for some time and the Constitutional Crisis helped to bring the hidden conflict out into the open. The Liberals action against the Constitutional Crisis was to introduce the Parliament Bill. This bill proposed that the Lords could not reject a finance bill and a bill passed by the Commons three times

"The Constitutional Monarchy And Absolutism" Improvements: Im Not Particularly A Good Closer. So A More Elaborate Conclusion Could Be In Order...Depending On What Your Specific Question Is

1648 words - 7 pages --Overview: Reviews the Glorious Revolution, and states how the Constitutional Monarchy came to be, and how it differed from Absolutism.The Constitutional Monarchy and AbsolutismCharles the First was sympathetic to Catholicism. He believed in the divine right of the monarchy. The Puritan influence in the U.K was rising. Parliament and the rising commercial class were having many conflicts and disagreements with the monarchy. The Parliament, an