The drug testing policy is a broken system that should be eliminated, it is siphoning off funds, is fundamentally ineffective and a blatant violation of constitutional rights
English III CP
September 18, 2009
Constitutionality of Drug testing
Free Speech. Fair trials. Due process. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure. The common factor? All the latter are God-given rights, rights that Americans believe that all human are born with, rights that have been boorishly violated by the administration of our schooling system. Indeed, the youth of America are daily exposed to "an invasive policy" (Rosenbaum), a policy that fails to fulfill its sole purpose, to prevent the use of drugs. The drug testing policy is violation of American rights to privacy. The drug testing policy is a broken system that should be eliminated; it is siphoning off funds, is fundamentally ineffective and is a blatant violation of Constitutional rights.
In this climate of economic recession monetary concerns are especially prevalent ,this is why squandering school funds on drug testing is unsound. Schools "spend between 10,000-$40,000 dollars a year [on drug testing]" (Rosenbaum). Those funds, could have been allocated differently to yield much more benefit. Many school programs are suffering under the current, drug test, heavy budget. Programs such as the student senate, a program were funds are being stretched so thin, that three bake sales are not enough to pay for a field trip. That "money could be spent in a much more beneficial way" providing ailing school programs with much needed capitol to bolster programs that keep children off the street and (Rosenbaum). Indeed, 50,000 dollars could be used to raise teachers' salaries in addition to a medley of other things. Teachers over worked as it is and asking them to take on responsibility for drug testing is too much. It is a commonly held economic fact that overworking an employ is not cost effective, they will soon quit and leave a gap in bunisses structure. In addition to the internal problems schools must look at the outward effects of the testing expense. Being that the money is coming wholly from tax payers it is only a matter of time before the public notices the failure of testing and demands that tax dollars be allocated differently. Looking from an economic stand point, this is a broken investment. It is not surprising then that schools would begin consider tempting the program especially with returns on investment, the effectiveness of the tests, so low.
Testing has been extremely inadequate in its most vital department: success rate. Through the course of a year "Only one (out of an entire school) tested positive", while in the next year when more students were screened none tested positive (Leinwand). This attitude towards testing is simply not the American way; Americans strive for the highest success rates and highest...