Consumers Beware: Safety In Cosmetic Products

2518 words - 11 pages

All cosmetics companies need to ban or stop animal testing altogether, and stop making animals suffer for human benefit. Even though it is just women buying these cosmetics, the harm extends beyond them and affects a wider scope including anyone buying household items. The harm is extensive, often not apparent right away, but the vast amount of dangerous chemicals inside these products could be doing harm unknowingly. By eliminating harmful ingredients in CoverGirl cosmetics then animal testing will significantly be reduced as well as the harm it has to consumers and the animals. Many companies that still do perform tests on animals are rather quiet about their practices, but there are other companies that are trying to change the approach to ensure safety of their products without animal testing.
Status Quo
New methods can replace animal testing and there is an ethical issue that needs to be taken seriously. Companies need to realize the harm extends from not just animals being tested but with consumer’s complaints of skin reactions from the potential 10,000 different ingredients with hidden dangers. Furthermore what is even more shocking is that most products aren’t regulated by the F.D.A, and that over 2,000 animals are being abused, tortured, and even killed per hour to “protect consumers”, which is evidentially false ("Animal Experimentation").

Need for Change
Proctor and Gamble and CoverGirl need to know the harm of these ingredients and the potential risks that consumers are facing from using their products. Therefore, animal treatment and our values and health and well-being need to be taken into consideration when choosing ingredients to be put into these different cosmetics. If the manufacturers of Proctor and Gamble (the company that CoverGirl is under) were to use safer ingredients in products it would leave consumers more at ease as well as a reduction of questions surrounding the safety of them. This then would lift the number of animals being tested in labs.
“Each year, more than 100 million animals, including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds- are killed in the U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing (PETA)”. This is just a massive amount of innocent animals that needs to be reduced significantly because with recent advancements of science new methods such as an in viitro test can change that number . With that many animals that are involved, Proctor and Gamble/ CoverGirl have been taking their own measures to “stop animal testing completely”. Proctor and Gamble’s claim that “99%+ of all safety evaluations don’t use animals”. They went on to say that if product markets such as Chin require a ban on animal testing, then by regulations they must use animal testing. The efforts mean that they have invested over $300 million for research...

Find Another Essay On Consumers Beware: Safety in Cosmetic Products

Should animals be used for research in cosmetic industry?

615 words - 3 pages Should animals be used for research in cosmetic industry? Animal testing is widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. These experiments can cause pain to the animals involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways. Animal experimenters are aware of this problem and agree that the testing should be made as humane as possible. While this practice has been followed for years now, some people still

History and Laws behind the Federal Food and Drug Act of 1906

2048 words - 8 pages History and Laws behind the Federal Food and Drug Act of 1906 As one of the primary federal consumer-protection laws in existence today, The Federal Food and Drug Act of 1906 was a law that had two primary goals for food and drugs: (a) forbid harmful ingredients and additions and (b) demand labeling of ingredients to inform consumers. According to Janssen

Analysis of the cosmetic industry

1524 words - 6 pages products are very much similar in the eyes of consumers, yet they are not exactly the same. Brand A's lipstick may carry a scent different from that of brand B, and brand B's lipstick could be shaped differently, affecting consumers' ultimate purchase. From an economic point of view, these lipsticks are vertically differentiated.Similarly, producers of cosmetic products have a virtually infinite variety of production methods to choose from. Using

Why Cosmetic Sugery Shouldnt be used to enhance beauty - English - Essay Assignment

730 words - 3 pages Enhancing natural beauty through cosmetic surgery can be a subjective case due to the lack in understanding the terms, natural and beauty. The term natural beauty can be conveyed differently through media as cosmetic companies tend to deliberately manipulate their consumers into thinking their products are non-chemical. However that opposes the term natural because these products are artificial. I believe cosmetic surgery is not a way to

Against Animal Testing

781 words - 3 pages both cases, once human effects were known, scientists were still unable to reproduce these effects in animals. Another big industry that is big for animal testing is the cosmetic companies. According to article fact of cosmetics testing that I accessed on November 10 every year, cosmetics companies kill millions of animals to test their products. These companies claim they test on animals to establish the safety of their products

Marketing Law & Ethics

2344 words - 9 pages than 'Let the buyer beware', which was the position in past times. This is evident in the Trade Practices Act, Part VA which provides that goods must have the safety a consumer is reasonably entitled to expect. Examples include an illness, accident or death, which resulted from a product because it was harmful, faulty or inadequately labelled. Organisations should pay attention to product quality to avoid a costly product liability suit.Since the

Cosmetic Surgery: A Risky and Costly Procedure

1823 words - 7 pages people go to such dangerous measures to look more attractive? People may be getting cosmetic surgery because the media makes a person feel unattractive. The media shows us these beauty queens that we feel like we have to live up to and compare ourselves to. As a society, it seems that we see the attractive people on TV or in movies and we think that we should be like them. Everyone likes them; maybe we will become more liked if we look like them

A women's best friend is also their greatest enemy

1745 words - 7 pages of my skin reacting to it because of lifetime wearing too much make-up causing skin irritants. DR Edward Seaton, consultant dermatologist of the Royal Free Hospital of North-West London, warned that products that labelled "organic" or "natural" could still contain irritants. Some of the most harmful ingredients in cosmetic products are Phthalates, Shea Butter, Balsam of Peru etc... There are many other harmful ingredients such a s P P D ( s h o r

Case Study: Dow Corning and the Silicone Breast Implant Controversy

2938 words - 12 pages valves and AIDS drugs, Rep. Weiss's summation of the FDA's delayed action on breast implants was that "Unfortunately, the ruling philosophy has been 'Let the buyer beware!"(Regush, 1992, p.29)Following the advice of an advisory panel the FDA will strictly limit access to these medical devices while safety studies are conducted. Although other options such as saline implants remain. In announcing his decision, David A. Kessler (1993), the

The Evils of Cosmetic Animal Testing

2719 words - 11 pages A lot of people buy cosmetic products being ignorant to the fact that, that one product has killed a lot of animals. How would you like being sprayed with poisonous liquids, taking poisonous eye drops?, or being fed toxic substances? Cosmetic factories have been doing these inhumane things and more to innocent animals for years. According to PETA, every year, millions of animals are poisoned and killed in barbaric tests that were crudely

Should Cosmetic Surgery Be Banned?

1282 words - 6 pages offices do not require licensing or accreditation to operate (O'Donnell). Right now, no precautions are in place to ensure the safety of cosmetic surgery patients. The PIP scandal and LeCroy’s story raised many questions about the cosmetic surgery field. Is it safe? Does it violate any rules or laws? Some argue that cosmetic surgery is in violation of the Hippocratic oath “…because it carries a potential for harm without curing or preventing disease

Similar Essays

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Internet Advertising In Promoting Products To Consumers

853 words - 4 pages internet advertising in promoting products to consumers. Methodology Participants The respondents for this study were Marketing Management students. It consisted of 30 students who were 16-20 years old. The researchers chose them to be the ones who will answer the survey questionnaire because they will definitely advertise in their future career. Also, some of the respondents were somehow engaged in Internet Advertising. Data

Apple Products Are Rarely Discounted And Despite Shopping Around, Consumers Find Little Difference In The Price Of Comparable Apple Products Betwe

1371 words - 6 pages smart phone market as their product dominant the market. A high initial price of any products means that the early adaptors would be their mostly die-hard loyal consumers, for example those who lined up outside apple store since few hours before they release any new models. Those consumers are significantly Apple bias, thus the message they distribute via mouth to mouth would be very positive for the company. In addition, they will always focus to

Fact Or Myth: Toxic Cosmetics Essay

2394 words - 10 pages formulas for safety, quality, and performance (Wiles and Dezio).The scientific process is rigorous, including “studies of closely related substances using computer modeling to predict toxicity, in-vitro testing, and human product safety experiences” (Dezio). If a product is unsafe, then the product isn’t even put into the market—products have to be safe. The federal law requires evidence of safety for the cosmetic product itself and the

Letter To Lóreal Canada Regarding Avoiding Animal Testing

2654 words - 11 pages certified. (L’Oréal Canada, 2014) Safety is a priority for us at L’Oréal Canada to ensure that our products are safe for our consumers so that they can enjoy the beauty of our cosmetic products. Health Canada has stated that science has not advanced to the point where they feel comfortable banning animal testing in the cosmetic industry, but that animal testing is not required for cosmetic products. (Bendall, 2011) However, the European Union has