Cooper V Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537 Carleton University Case Brief

3181 words - 13 pages

Cooper v Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537
Midterm Assignment
Victoria Butters
LAWS 2202A
David Dwoskin
Monday November 6, 2017
Trusting an outsider with your money is not a simple thing, especially when you may not always foresee or comprehend what the end result could be. A mortgage broker is someone who carries on a business of lending money secured in whole or in part by mortgages, whether the money is the mortgage broker's own or that of another person.[footnoteRef:1] In this paper, I will briefly review the case Cooper v Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R,[footnoteRef:2] followed by examining whether the court had jurisdiction to recognize a new duty of care. Finally, I will discuss the public policy reasons for and against expanding the Court’s ability to understand and perceive new obligations of care, in particular, those including Statutory Bodies. [1: Mortgage Brokers Act, RSBC 1996, c 313] [2: Cooper v. Hobart, 2001 SCC 79, [2001] 3 SCR 537]
In the case, Cooper v Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R, Eron Mortgage Corporation which was a mortgage broker under the Mortgage Brokers Act, had suspended a registered mortgage license because the investor's funds were used for unauthorized purposes. The plaintiff applied to have the action certified as a class action proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50. which would owe a private law duty of care to members of the investing public for alleged negligence in failing to properly oversee the conduct of an investment company licensed by the regulator.[footnoteRef:3] The plaintiff also said that the registrar had the right to tell them what came and could come of the investment. Not only did the registrar know about the violation of the Mortgage Brokers Act, but the plaintiff also suggests the registrar should have acted earlier to suspend the actions the investors made followed by communicating to them that the broker was under investigation. By informing the investors about what was happening with the broker, they could have prevented or mitigated loss in the investment. The issue brought to court was that there is a duty of care owed to the plaintiff and the defendant could have communicated to the investors, and/or suspended the license of the broker earlier, thereby mitigating or preventing further loss of investment. The ratio of the case was a revised version of the Anns test, which was initially adopted from Kamloops v. Nielson[footnoteRef:4] to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases. At both stages of the Anns test, a question was developed to find whether there was a relationship required between the plaintiff and appellant or action needed of duty of care. [3: Ibid. at para 6. ] [4: Kamloops v. Nielsen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 2]
The duty of care is a standard in the law of negligence. In any accusation, the claimant must show, among other things, that the defendant owed him/her a duty of care. The starting point is to look for an existing...

Find Another Essay On Cooper v Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537 - Carleton University - Case Brief

Hollowell v. Orleans Regional Hospital Case brief - Business Law II - Case Study Assignment

469 words - 2 pages Adam Murphy Bus Law II Prof. David September 12th, 2016 CASE BRIEF #2 Case: Hollowell v. Orleans Regional Hospital, 217 F3d 379 (5th Cir. 2000) Facts: Orleans Regional Hospital, a Medicaid funded psychiatric hospital primarily served adolescents and children. The hospital was a limited liability company established with three members; NORS LLC, North Louisiana, Inc. and Precision, Inc. Defendants John C. Turner and William C. Windham held fifty

Homicide Case Study R v. Gittany - Griffith University, Criminology and Criminal Justice - Case study

1790 words - 8 pages Homicide Case Review R v. Gittany Question 1. Type of homicide The type of homicide featured in the case of R v Gittany (2014) is intimate partner homicide, or more specifically intimate partner femicide as the victim was female. Intimate partner homicide is a sub-category of domestic homicide and is defined by the Australian Institute of Criminology (2015) as homicide occurring between intimate partners, where the perpetrator and victim share a

Summary and key notes on the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

845 words - 3 pages petitioner could not take race into account in making admissions decisions, the program was held to violate the Federal and State Constitutions and Title VI. Respondent's admission was not ordered, however, for lack of proof that he would have been admitted but for the special program. A related case is DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), in which Marco DeFunis, Jr., applied for admission as a first-year student at the University of Washington Law School

Legal brief essay-3 strikes case

1078 words - 4 pages for the consequences or their actions, not the government’s. If the laws of a nation do not teach the people to do right then it is hard, and useless, to enforce any laws whatsoever. If the defendant is not punished effectively, they cannot learn right from wrong.In the precedent set by the case Rummel v. Estelle, in which also the court was dealing with whether a life sentence was “grossly disproportionate” to the crime committed

This well cited paper explains the UNiversity of Michigan's law case along with background on affirmatice action history. It also includes amicus brief implications and uses in the decisions

1602 words - 6 pages University of California v. Bakke case where racial quotas were challenged and defeated. The more recent notable affirmative action case involves the University of Michigan and its admission policies. This case brought a total of 102 legal brief filings; seventy-eight were in support of the university, nineteen opposed, and five neutral. President Bush surprisingly took a public stance against the university and instructed the solicitor general Ted

In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter

2454 words - 10 pages &country=THA&node=docs&documentUid=699&pageNum=2 . Narcotics Control Act. Retrived June 16th, 20086.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 28. Retrieved June 16th, 20087.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 327. University of Toronto Press

The Evolution of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights in Canada

2009 words - 8 pages female inmate would likely carry harmful effects. In this context, differential treatment, although not promoting further equality, did not lead to inequality. Furthermore, the case of British Columbia v. British Columbia Government and Service Employees Union, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 3 provides an excellent example of a case where identical treatment caused inequality. The female appellant, Tawney Meiorin, was a fire fighter who "performed her work

Is the Kyoto Accord Constitutional

3138 words - 13 pages Quebec [1997] 3 S.C.R. 213.BibliographyBurns, Thomas G., Post Kyoto Climate Policy Possible; Oil and Gas Journal, 2001, Vol. 99:30 pg. 21.Castrilli, Joseph F., "R. v. Hydro-Quebec: the Criminal law power my hinder the future of federal protection of the environment." Criminal Reports Fifth Series. 2002, Vol. 50, pg 312-319.Draper, Dianne., Our Environment, Thomson Canada Limited, 2002.LeClair, Jean., "The Supreme Court, the Environment and the

The Missing Aboriginals of Hobart

1486 words - 6 pages Much has been written concerning the origins of Hobart, Tasmania, but little of this would include its local aboriginals. Hobart was considered a home to the nomadic Mouheneer tribe (Asia Rooms, 2011), very little is written about them except in brief passages in most sources that detail the history of the area. Generally, what follows after the Mouheneer is that Hobart was first settled by the English for purposes of using it as a penal colony

Cele mai frumoase zone turistice din Europa

5661 words - 23 pages odată ce altitudinea crește. Cele mai mari altitudini și cel mai abrupt relief de pe continentul European se găsește mai spre sud, unde structurile orogenului Cenozoic alcătuiesc tabloul montan. În Alpi, vârful Mont Blanc atinge înălțimea de 4807m, fiind cel mai înalt punct de pe continent. Alte lanțuri muntoase importante, care trebuie amintite sunt Pirineii, Sierra Nevada

The mind-body relation at descartes

2861 words - 11 pages ; a concepției lui Descartes asupra cauzalității consultați Clatterbaugh, K. The Causal Debate in Modern Philosophy 1637-1739, Routledge, 1996.2 Descartes, Rene. Meditații metafizice. Editura Crater, București, 1993. (trad. Ion Papuc). p.3 În citările ulterioare se va folosi MM urmat de numărul paginii.3 Se poate considera că o explicație pentru nemurirea sufletului este oferită prin

Similar Essays

Medina V California Case Brief Essay

645 words - 3 pages defense all the time, but isn't successful most of the time. Medina should have pleaded guilty and saved some time a trouble.ReferencesLaw School Case Briefs | Hints | Tactics. (n.d.). : Medina v. California case brief. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from v. California 112 S. Ct. 2572 (1992). (n.d.). Mediana v. California 112 S. Ct. 2572 (1992). Retrieved January

Arzu V. Arzu Case Brief Essay

541 words - 2 pages Richard Arzu v. Frank Arzu and Estanisalo Arzu 597 N.Y.S. 2d 322 Brief PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Richard Arzu brought action against his father, Frank Arzu, and step-mother, Estanisalo Arzu, alleging misrepresentation and fraud in connection with a medical malpractice action settlement monies which Frank entrusted to his father; and seeking compensatory damages and related relief. The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Silver J. , vacated ex parte order

Marbury V. Madison Case Brief Essay

500 words - 2 pages Marbury v. Madison5 U.S. 137 (S.Ct. 1803)Facts: President Adams appointed William Marbury to the position of justice of the peace in 1801. However, Marbury failed to receive his commission before the end of the Adams Administration. The new Jefferson administration had ordered the secretary of state (James Madison) not to deliver Marbury's commission. By the Judiciary Act of 1789, Marbury sued Madison in the Supreme Court seeking a writ of

Case Brief Of Illinois V. Caballes

1041 words - 5 pages Case Brief of Illinois v. Caballes Citation: 543 U.S. 405 (2005) Case Facts: Roy Caballes was stopped for speeding by an Illinois state trooper Daniel Gillette. During the traffic stop another state trooper Craig Graham of the Illinois State Police Drug Interdiction Team, overheard the stop on the radio and showed up to the scene with a narcotics detection dog. While the first trooper was writing Roy Caballes a warning ticket for speeding the