This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Cosmological Argument Is Invalid Essay

1165 words - 5 pages

Humans can never know for the certain why the universe was created or what caused it but, we can still create arguments and theories to best explain what might have created the universe. The cosmological argument is another idea to prove the existence of god. Many philosophers debate wheatear the cosmological argument is valid. The cosmological argument starts off quite simply: whatever exists must come from something else. Nothing is the source of its own existences, nothing is self-creating []. The cosmological argument states at some point, the cause and effect sequence must have a beginning. This unexpected phenomenal being is god. According to the argument, god is the initial start of ...view middle of the document...

If nothing is able bring itself into existence, the initial cause therefore is god. God is the only self-creating being as stated in the cosmological argument. The strength of this argument is how it uses god to explain the unexplainable since, we can never know for certain the beginning of time []. This argument however has a few flaws. The argument states that odd are initial cause and self-creating but, the premises stated nothing is self-creating; therefore god must have a cause. Rationally we should conclude if nothing is the cause of its own existence, god itself cannot just come into existence creating a finite four-dimension universe. This created some controversy and lead debates.
David Humes proposed a hypothesis that the material universe has always existed, in which case the sequence of causes and effects go back in time forever. This explanation does not lack an explanation, because the universe did not have an initial start and no end. This argument however proves the cosmological argument wrong, since there is no god, if the cycle of causes and effects goes on forever a beginning does not exist. William Wanwright’s counter argument proposed that the fact that everything has an infinite cause for its creation does not logically follow. The example is given that if the sequence of cause and effect were off on forever humans therefore existed forever. Studies obviously show that this is not the case, committing the fallacy of composition. Fallacy of composition is when parts of a whole are used to prove something about a whole. I agree with Humen’s argument because it explains that even if ‘a god’ created the universe, god’s creation is never ending which holds true for the first premises, nothing can bring itself into existence. This brings up a long thought theory, the Big Bang theory. The ‘event’ that created it all.
Scientist have studied the universe realized that the universe get smaller the farther we travel back in time. So far that at one point the universe was in a style of compression where the destiny and all other forces were incite. However many debates arise in trying to figure what happened before the Big Bang. Craig explained that it is impossible to explain the world before the Big Bang because physics and life was created at when time greater than zero. This is where the cosmological argument comes in, nothing is self creating, and...

Find Another Essay On Cosmological Argument is Invalid

The Cosmological Argument Essay

1863 words - 7 pages The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically represented below. Cosmological Argument 1

Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1344 words - 5 pages Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning ‘world’ or ‘universe.’ The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a

Does the Cosmological Argument prove that God exists? - Philosophy - Essay

970 words - 4 pages Does the cosmological argument prove that God exists? (15) The cosmological argument being a term that includes a number of arguments, asserts that the universe is a product of many causes and effects. This entails that as everything that has come to exist in the universe has to have been caused somehow then there must be a preliminary cause to start off the chain of events. Such a preliminary cause must be uncaused and the thesis of the

strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

983 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not

Craig's Argument for the Existence of God

1028 words - 5 pages Craig/Kalam’s Cosmological Argument By: Matthew Buckingham PHIL 100 4/26/2014 One of the most argued topics throughout human history is whether or not God exists. It is argued frequently because there are several different reasonings and sub arguments in this main argument. People who believe God exists argue how God acts and whether there is one or several. People who do not believe God exists argue how the universe became into

God

654 words - 3 pages cosmological arguments, and will try to point out some counter arguments against them.Let's begin analyzing the ontological argument which describes the actual existence of god, by the fact that his actual definition says he exist. This definition says that god is a perfect being by itself and lacks non-existence. Descartes come up with the concept of god being this perfect being, then he says that this perfect being lack no perfection. I find this

Critical Analysis of McCloskey’s Arguement in "On Being an Athiest"

1523 words - 7 pages God is the best explanation for the effects we observe in the universe. This also comes from lesson 18. McCloskey’s claim, that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” It is this author’s opinion; God could not exist because of the existence of the world. The cause of the universe must be necessary. “Many versions of the cosmological argument do, of course, begin by claiming that

cosmological arg

1655 words - 7 pages The cosmological argument focuses on nature and the origin of the universe. The three main philosophers I will be looking at with regards to the cosmological argument are Aquinas, Averroes and Maimonides. The simplest form of the cosmological argument follows the structure that; the cosmos exists and that the existence of the cosmos means that it must have a cause, and this cause is God. It attempts to move from the existence of the cosmos

Does the Cosmological Argument persuasively argue for the existence of God? - Essay

2072 words - 9 pages The Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God are arguing for God's existence from the starting point of the existence of the universe. The word cosmological comes from the Greek word for cosmos meaning world or universe. The Cosmological Argument is an a posteriori and inductive argument which means it is based on our experience of the world around us. I will be arguing that the Cosmological Argument does persuasively argue for the

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

940 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the

The Anthropic Teleological Argument: Proving God's existance by means of Probability

1184 words - 5 pages system and the universe. As we now understand from looking to the past, we may not have an explanation for all things, but all things have an explanation. God was used to fill in the blanks that science could not. Simply because we cannot comprehend or evaluate some aspect of life does not mean that we will not understand it in the future. Betty and Cordell's argument is invalid because they use faulty logic to come up with their conclusion.Betty

Similar Essays

The Cosmological Argument Is Self Contradictory Essay

1160 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument, also known as the First Cause Argument, is one of the most important arguments for the existence of God, not only because it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must have a cause and that the first cause of everything must have been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the existence

The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

1245 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically

The Main Properties Of The Cosmological Argument

1220 words - 5 pages The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and ever since been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters was Leibniz. The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation. Its major supporter was Thomas Aquinas though Gotfried Leibniz also put forward a simplified version of Aquinas's cosmological argument. The major critics

The Cosmological And Teleological Arguments Essay

1760 words - 7 pages itself cannot be trusted, and on these grounds, the cosmological argument has been disproved. If this fundamental crack in the theory is not cause enough for dismissal, other less popular disproofs do exist. Moving away from the realm of philosophy and into that of science, from a scientific standpoint the cosmological argument is totally invalid. Let us assume that what we know as “the start of the Universe” can be accepted as the Big Bang event