Court Paper Operation Of Canadian Court Systems

1706 words - 7 pages

ALGONQUIN COLLEGECourt Paper K. WhiteCanadian Justice Systems and LegislationBy:Karyn WhiteInstructor: Kelly McDonaldDecember 9, 2008The Oakville Civic CentreCourt Paper AssignmentThe Oakville Civic Centre houses the Ontario Court of Justice, though the locals here simply refer to the building as "The Oakville Court"; besides prosecuting criminals in the Ontario Court of Justice, also known as the Provincial Court, the Oakville Civic Centre covers many different Court Systems in one location.The Oakville Civic Centre's Ontario Court of justice covers cases ranging from family and civil law (although these cases are not usually criminal) to Criminal Law (,2009). Housed in the same building are Youth Court Services along with both Adult and Youth Probation services. They also have areas for traffic violations and a place to appeal a traffic violation, however the hearings for these appeals are held in the Milton Court.This would place the Oakville Civic Centre's Ontario Court of Justice fourth in the hierarchy of the Criminal Court System in Canada. With the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada falling respectively above in ascending order. The Supreme Court of Canada being the final place for a criminal trial to move through to in the system. In effect after the Provincial Courts held the bail and preliminary hearings and if the case were to go to trial at the Ontario Court of Justice, it could then appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeals and from there appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (that being the case if the appeals were accepted). If a more serious indictable offence were tried at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the attorneys or defendant could try for appeal at the appeals court and then finally at the Supreme Court of Canada with the Ontario Court of Justice only hearing the Preliminary trials and Bail hearings for the indictable offenceThe Provincial court is generally a trial court. It deals mostly with summary conviction offences and sometimes indictable offences that are less serious. Also some Accused person's of indictable offences may chose to have their trial at the Ontario Court of Justice given that they decide themselves that they do not want their trial to take place at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, and are properly informed of their right to chose and of the implications of both decisions.Preliminary hearings, first appearances and bail hearings are also held at the Provincial Court. In this type of court trials are heard by a Judge alone. Roughly 90% of trials are actually disposed of at the provincial Court level. (McDonald, K 2008) Provincially appointed Judges try cases at this level and the cases generally move quite rapidly through the system.During the trial date of December 9, 2008 there were a...

Find Another Essay On Court Paper-Operation of Canadian Court Systems

Acclaimed Court Decision on Aboriginal Title: Unprecedented Force on Canadian Politics, Law and Society

1776 words - 7 pages . As a result, impartiality has remained challenge the Canadian government to adhere to treaty and Aboriginal rights and for the most part prior to 1982, many First Nations have been confronted with the struggle to retain autonomy of the federal and provincial governments and work toward reasserting self-determination framework for their people. Prior to the Delgamuukw court case, the societal attitudes and government mandates varied as it relates

court paper

802 words - 3 pages time before the trial itself. Arraignment consists of the court reading to the defendant the substance of the charge, and calls on the subject to enter a plea within a given time.Not only is the arraignment process a process in a criminal trial that most peopledo not know much about but it is also a process that society segregate the offender. The arraignment process has been looked into depth in the book entitled The Jail: Managing the underclass

Etymology of Court

1165 words - 5 pages suddenly the verb involved itself with the matters of the heart. In either case, the noun has influenced the verb. This paper has discussed the word court. It has covered the roots and origin of the word, why it is polysemic, how it came into the English lexicon, reasons for why it has evolved in English, and how it has become an adjective and a verb. By looking at examples of text and making a comparison of connotation in past and present, a

court of justice

865 words - 4 pages The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) was established in 1952 by the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty, and serves as the highest court in the European Union (Communication Department of the European Commission). The courts mission is to guarantee compliance with the law in interpreting and applying the Treaties (Communication Department of the European Commission). As part of its mission, “the court reviews the legality of

Contempt of Court in Canada

2368 words - 9 pages Introduction This paper is concerned with the common law of contempt of court. More specifically, it outlines the arguments in favour of, and against, codifying this law. The purpose is to discuss problems with contempt of court, and make proposals to restructure the law. The first part of this paper will explain the openness principle, which is the balancing factor in respect of contempt of court. The second part will outline the common law

Report of a Court Visit

2565 words - 10 pages , I will contact the Commission and arrange an interpreting service for her going to the Commission. If she criteria unmet, I will ask her think about private lawyer. I will get the court papers ready before hearing day, if she wishes me does it.ConclusionIn my report, I demonstrated the Australia legal systems and there are three levels of jurisdiction in the New South Wales. As a social worker may involve legal aid or family support and deal

The European Court of Justice

1337 words - 5 pages : · Preliminary rulings. To avoid differences of interpretation of EU law by national courts, the preliminary ruling procedure allows co-operation between national courts and the ECJ. · If a case comes before a national court that involves an interpretation of an EU law and there is a doubt as to how it should be interpreted, the national court will refer the question to the ECJ to decide. The ECJ will make a decision as to how the

The High court of Australia

1779 words - 7 pages 1)What is the role of the High Court in Australia?The High Court of Australia is the nations most fundamental legal tribunal. The Australian High Court was formed by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900. Under the original jurisdiction, the exclusive role of the Australian High Court is to interpret the constitution through making decisional outcomes upon existing disputes on constitutional matters.Under the High Court of

European Court Of Human Rights

2357 words - 9 pages 1. INTRODUCTIONThe European Court of Human Rights has, since long conference of European Constitutional Courts and their work, it always follows with keen interest. It has observer status, but it does not mean she has no hand in the field of European constitutional justice. Instead, according to the conception I have of her role, the European Court works in partnership with national constitutional courts and courts of equivalent jurisdiction

The Court of King Arthur

993 words - 4 pages The Court of King Arthur in the Tales of Lanval and Sir Gawain the Green Knight King Arthur shows to be a very provident king who treats his people with a large amount of his riches and fortune. Additionally, the people of his court show to be honest, full of chivalry, and trustworthy. There would seem to be a sort of contract between the king and his subjects: he provides for them, and they, as his most loyal subjects, keep to his

AP US History Paper on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court Case

1253 words - 5 pages Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court CaseThe Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court case in 1954 revolved around the issue of equality between black and white children in segregated schools. It was the result of a long-standing legal campaign carried on by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), to resolve the effects of Jim Crow laws

Similar Essays

Canadian Supreme Court Essay

1224 words - 5 pages In 1990, the Canadian Supreme Court exempted members of the Musqueam community from general fishing restrictions on cultural grounds. Choose either the “unequal impact argument” or “the cultural resources argument” and explain how it might be used to support the view that it was right to grant an exemption in this case. Evaluate the strength of the argument as it applies to the case. On the 25th May 1984 Musqueam Band Member Ron Sparrow was

Court Systems And Criminal Justice Essay

1429 words - 6 pages The two types branches of our court systems is the duel court system (Bohm & Haley, 2010, p 288). Each system in the Federal or State side contains numerous possibilities in their jurisdiction with their authority to of the court to hear and decide cases (Bohm & Haley, 2010, p 288). However, the two courts described are: Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction and Trial courts of General Jurisdiction. Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction is a

Contrast/Comparison Of State And Federal Court Systems

1034 words - 4 pages AbstractAfter filing an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint and seeing the complaint through to arbitration and then being sent a "Right to Sue" letter, the next step is to file a complaint with the court of jurisdiction. Dependant on what discrimination law the Right to Sue letter is used will depend on what court the complaint will be filed. State or Federal Court systems are two separate and distinct institutions and have

Plea Bargains: Currency Of The Courts An Examination Of The Effectiveness Of Plea Bargain Within Our Court Systems

1514 words - 6 pages lighten the load of the Court systems of lengthy, costly trials, but also impart justice where justice was needed. Notwithstanding those who would criticize its use, the Homolka plea bargain and the enquiry, which followed, also demonstrate the utility of this tool in the criminal justice system. Works Cited Alex Deane. (2008, November 29). International debate education association. Retrieved from