Theft And Fair Labeling: The Harm Principle

1198 words - 5 pages

Theft is the intentional taking of someone else’s property dishonestly without the owner’s consent. Theft requires the physical elements to be supported by fault, whereby the accused either intends to deprive the property’s owner permanently, or seriously impinge on the owner’s proprietary rights.
Deception is the intentional use of false representations by an individual through words or conduct; in order to dishonestly obtain an unfair advantage for self or another by inducing the victim to transfer a benefit or inflict a detriment upon the victim. The intention to deceive is the supportive fault element.
Harm Principle
Mill stated the ‘classic liberal view of the relationship between law and morality’, introducing the Harm Principle: ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’.
According to Feinberg, the Harm Principle is liberty limiting - in order for behaviour to be caught by criminal law, that is, considered harm, wrongdoing must be a serious offence. ‘To be harm a person’s interests must be setback’.
Section 134(2) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act (‘CLCA’) provides that a person will be guilty of an offence if they seriously encroach on the owner’s rights to their property. To seriously encroach would mean the offender dealt with the victims property with the intention of treating it as their own to dispose of at will. Or, the offender dealt with the property in a manner that created a substantial risk to the owner of recovery. The function of s 134(2) is to deter the possibility of that harm. To permanently deprive someone of their property rights by dealing with property dishonestly and without their consent is a clear setback of interests to the owner - satisfying Feinberg’s perspective.
If someone acted dishonestly without the requisite of causing harm to another, and was convicted of theft, the law would depart from the Harm Principle. If an offender’s conduct is dishonest and violates another’s property rights, it would satisfy the Harm Principle and justify criminalizing the conduct; clearly reflected in s 134.
The Harm Principle aims to ensure ‘minimal state interference in people’s lives’. The State should not interfere with personal liberty; interference should occur only should someone else be at risk.
If an individual engaged in deceptive conduct, or misused the trust placed in them by another to induce the victim to transfer a benefit or suffer a detriment, they would affect the person’s interests by dishonestly impeding their judgement and hence be at risk. By coercing another to part with their property through false representations in order to gain a benefit or cause a detriment, an offender infringes another’s rights.
Misusing trust placed in another is wrongful because it would betray them; representing clear harm to their interests. Had the victim...

Find Another Essay On Theft and Fair Labeling: The Harm Principle

The Epigenetic Principle and Success Essay

1947 words - 8 pages The Epigenetic Principle and Success Human development can be described as an assembly line in the factory of life. Although we can try our best to understand the machines that propel the product down the line, all we know is what can be seen from outside the gates. There are several theories pertaining to how the factory operates, but we have no way of entering it. Some of the best theories come from Abraham Maslow and Erik Erikson who's

The Definition and Limitations of Harm

1536 words - 6 pages . This would then restrict the liberty of other members of the population, who may not find animal product consumption problematic. By restricting this, Mill makes this portion of his argument viable and defends against any argument against his definition that uses offended morals. However, while portions of Mill’s definition are practical, his standards of harm are too broad to be completely viable. Mill’s liberty principle rests on the notion that

Downloading Music and Movies Harm the Artist

1512 words - 7 pages those artists to create better music as well. Because it is really exciting if one's work is enjoyed by a lot of people. Thus, it is good for music producers as well if their music could be downloaded for free and spread widely. Some people might concern about the copyright issue of downloading music. They may say it is not fair to music artists if their music is downloaded for free because the artist cannot get pay from their work. They may also

The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act

1106 words - 4 pages The act of manufactures labeling of our foods products in terms of the ingredients a particular product contains and the nutritious facts is sometimes taken for granted, we often see the labels on our food products, but ignore them because we’re so used to seeing them in our daily lives. Surprisingly, food product labeling, specifically that pertaining to allergen warnings, were not always available to consumers until a government mandate in

The European Union and The Precautionary Principle

2077 words - 9 pages more of an issue than before. The European Union now looks back and considers the changes they made that brought them away from past policies to be a beneficial one and have determined the precautionary principle to be successful at having prevented further damage. The precautionary principle starts regulation before harm can be done and is merely concentrated on risk in an endeavor to preserve or better the environment. It is however, difficult to

The Labeling Theory and its Effect on Devience

692 words - 3 pages According to labeling theory, deviance is a product of a societal reaction to behaviour. A label is created as a reaction to an isolated incident by agents of social control. The recipient then internalizes the label and absorbs it into their self identity. Once they identify with the label, the individual will act in ways that fulfill the label. The focus of labeling theory is on the process of how the label leads to further delinquent

The Evaluation And Labeling Of Children With Disabilities

1706 words - 7 pages focusing on labeling The results of the PMI and APC were quite similar and gave me an opportunity to focus on the points of the evaluation process. If Malia had not been labeled, she would not be eligible for special school services or SocialSecurity/Disability aid. I would be financially unable to care for her in the way that I do. I would have to work full time and would not be available to her as I am now. I also realized in doing the PMI that the

Exchange: Social and the Market Principle

1521 words - 6 pages ceremonial forms…” (2010, 86). . Men who are able to make the most trades to receive the pieces with the most history, and therefore assigned value, are able to rise in the social hierarchy. The Trobriand Islanders believe that magical powers and sorcery are skills held by Kula masters from the pieces they hold. They have more power because people are afraid of what harm the magic could bring. This is shown in the documentary Kula: Ring of Power

Archimedes and The Principle of Buoyancy

1787 words - 7 pages raised. Something clicked inside of his head, and he shouted “Eureka,” meaning; “I have found it,” and ran through the streets with excitement naked. Archimedes took the mass of gold equivalent to the crown, and put it in a tub of water, and noticed how much it rose, or displaced. He then took the crown, and put it in the same tub, and noticed the water raised more, proving silver was added to the crown. This went on to be known as the Principle

John Locke and The Egalitarian Principle

948 words - 4 pages establishment of civil government was on the basis of preserving each individual’s life, liberty and property. Locke’s basis serves as an egalitarian principle because it portrays equality of protection amongst the people. According to Locke, all men have natural rights and they would agree to transition from a state of nature to a civil government because their rights along with their property would be preserved. Overall, in terms of men, Locke

In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter

2454 words - 10 pages In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter. Explain the harm principle and the court's reasons for rejecting it. Did the court reach the right decision in holding that the authority of the Canadian state is not limited by the harm principle? Why or why not?In his essay "On Liberty", John Stuart Mill explains the importance of

Similar Essays

Identity Theft And The Internet Essay

1543 words - 6 pages Identity Theft and the Internet You come home and find two mysterious UPS packages at your doorstep. Funny; they're addressed to you, but you didn't order anything. You open one of them to find a cell phone with the latest accessories. The enclosed invoice shows that it was shipped to you but billed to someone with your name at another address a few miles away. Same name? Same city? Stranger things can happen. There's a phone number, so

Labeling Youths...And The Consequences Thereof Essay

1452 words - 6 pages popular perspective during the 1960s and 1970s but it has proven to be influential in current times as well. This theory was developed over the course of years by three prominent theorists: Frank Tannenbaum, Edwin M. Lemert and Howard Becker. It is also known as Interactional Theory of Deviance and Social Reaction Perspective. Frank Tannenbaum is noted with the first use of labeling theory within his book Crime and Community in 1938. “The process

An Argument For The Legalization Of Drugs. Based On John Stuart Mills' "Revised Harm Principle"'

1042 words - 4 pages choose to do so. This essay will address the issue from the standpoint of John Stuart Mills' 'Revised Harm Principle",' which asserts that people should be free to do what they want unless they threaten the vital interests (i.e., security or autonomy) of others.Using Mills' principle as a litmus test for this issue leads one to come down on the side of legalization. Since Mills is concerned not with individual rights, but with the consequences of

Sexual Offender Laws And The Labeling Theory

1812 words - 7 pages Many people might think that sex offenders are repugnant to society and that people who commit sex crimes should be removed from our society. The reality is that many people do not know that most people who commit sex offenses are normal people. In most cases, they are hardworking people who got caught doing something our society ‘thinks’ is wrong and get labelled sex offenders. This is where Labeling Theory comes into places, because it focus