I feel a supportive emotion about your feelings.
I feel pity for your pain.
~ Suzanne Keen, Empathy and the Novel
William Apess, in his article “An Indian's Looking-Glass for the White Man,” contends that to proclaim Christianity and still recognize races is a lip service not upheld by the Book of scriptures. In the initial segment of his article Apess asks a few inquiries, for example, for what valid reason, if God cherishes white individuals so much, did he make fifteen minorities individuals for each white one, and of the considerable number of races, who has carried out the most terrible wrongdoings? He goes ahead to stress that neither Jesus nor his followers were white cleaned. He additionally addresses the white individual’s entitlement to control Native Americans. Apess asks his predominately white, Christian gathering of people to rethink their own partialities and finishes up his article arguing “pray you not stop till this tree of distinction shall be leveled to the earth, and the mantle of prejudice torn from every American heart---then peace shall pervade the Union.”
Apess precisely depicts the prejudice that Native Americans endure. It exists in both the individual and inside governmental issues. Amid the late 1800's, the point at which this article was composed, it was illicit in Massachusetts for whites and Indians to intermarry. He marks this as a reasonable encroachment on people to settle on their own choices. He additionally raises the point that many white individuals don’t significantly view the Indian as met all requirements for the privileges of a person. This dehumanization enables white individuals to take the Indians’ territory and murder them without the slightest hesitation. He approaches the whites, as Christians, to reassess these bigot sees. Individuals can’t call themselves Christians and abuse others, in light of skin shading, for the sake of Christianity. Apess says that words must be supplemented by activities. In spite of the fact that Apess convincingly contends against the inclinations inside the Christian people group, he constructs his contentions with respect to a few presumptions, fail to address issues, for example, the dialect hindrance and issues that emerge when two unique societies endeavor to possess a similar land.
At the point when Apess utilizes Christianity as his device to scatter racism he makes a few unbacked presumptions. In the first place, he overlooks that whites and Indians seldom utilize a similar dialect not to mention have a similar religious esteems, in this manner nobody apparatus can be utilized for the two societies. Other than simply the conspicuous dialect hindrance, whites and Indians utilize altogether extraordinary words and expressions to express ideas. The first dialect boundary was separated by instructing the Indians Spanish, English or other European dialects, yet issues in correspondence did not end here.