Everyone possess critical thinking skills but when it comes to criticize a journal article it can be difficult for the first time, one of the best ways to develop critical thinking and reading skills is to use some strategies when reading and evaluating a research study (Wood & Haber,1998). The following essay it is going to focus in a critique of a qualitative journal article by giving its strengths and weakness, critical appraisal it is going to be done with support from different references and frameworks relevant to a qualitative study.
Crombie & Davies (1997) stated that the article title gives an understanding of what the study is going to be about and the author intentions of how the study will be done. The current article title generates a form a ‘relation-ship’ between radiographer and patient which represent a dependant variable and also has been expressed into a declarative format rather than a question format (Wood & Haber 1998). It also gives an idea about the method used for this study which is Transactional Analysis (Booth, 2007) and is written in a comprehensive way which engages the reader to have a look further throughout the article. In previous observational study (Booth & Manning, 2005) found that Transactional Analysis can be effectively used for identifying radiographers communication and behaviour within the department. Author name appears under the title but its professional occupation is not mentioned and therefore the question arises if the author is by profession radiographer or has a background in radiography, however the journal is peer-reviewed with all dates available since receiving the article to its availability online (Bassett, 2004).
From abstract of article is stated that the present research study it is a secondary research from previous one where the communication was ‘‘practitioner centred’’ and the actual one ‘‘patient centred’’ this means that Booth (2007) came into the study with pre-existing ideas of the actual topic and she does not generate a grounded-theory but she is trying to develop a new theory using the results from previous study (Bowling and Shah, 2007), however it is good that she is trying to explore a new area whereby little is known and is trying to generate a new theory, this is one of the good points in conducting a qualitative research study (Bassett, 2004). There are not any gasps in the knowledge base and the author seems to be well informed about communication in radiography, from first view the content of abstract is well organised with clear rationale aims to perform a qualitative study (Bassett,2004).
Introduction and Background
In this section the author provides the general problem of the study and main reasons for producing this study are explained ,however (Booth,2007) recognise that the actual study form a part of ‘‘wider empirical study’’ , in this case the author uses the results from previous study to generate a new theory, the...