This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Critically Compare And Contrast Traditional Marxist And Functionalist Perspectives On Crime.

2413 words - 10 pages

through our primary interaction with others beginning at home and continuing onto schooling and work. Our beliefs aren't always set in stone and can change through time and growth and the interaction with others once outside the family domain. There are many explanations beginning with Durkheim who was a functionalist, there is Merton who doesn't totally agree with Durkheim but adopted his theory on 'Anomie' and made it his own. Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGYPage 1CRITICALLY COMPARE AND CONTRAST FUNCTIONALIST AND TRADITIONAL MARXIST PERSPECTIVES ON CRIMEThere are many theories on why crime exists as well has who is committing the crimes and the underlying reasons behind it The two main perspectives being Traditional Marxist and Functionalist both with different views they share very little in common, however they do agree that society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society. What is meant by that is that we are all products of our upbringings and learn through socialisation what our beliefs are, what we agree on personally and often shared beliefs and the understanding of what is 'the norm; through our primary interaction with others beginning at home and continuing onto schooling and work. Our beliefs aren't always set in stone and can change through time and growth and the interaction with others once outside the family domain. There are many explanations beginning with Durkheim who was a functionalist, there is Merton who doesn't totally agree with Durkheim but adopted his theory on 'Anomie' and made it his own. In addition there is Hirschi whose theories mirrored that of Durkheim's and before concluding, Marxist view on crime will be looked at.The Functionalist view on crime and society is likening it to the human body to explain it functions. The body has it organs whereas society has it institutions. Functionalists have an interest in the functions of crime, hence the name and are interested in how crime contributes to society as a whole. There is a belief that society is based on consensus or agreement of shared beliefs and values of what is considered to be 'the norm', the views hare then passed on through socialisation. Share values and beliefs originate from the family and re-enforced through education, the media and the judiciary system. Functionalists see crime to have a function in society however not a primary one in that it provides jobs and can set standards for enforcement and laws are introduced or are looked at to further set boundariesAn amount of crime is good whereas too much crime is bad and could bring about societal collapse bringing further anarchy and confusion. I was Emile Durkheim who began the study that gave birth to functionalist approaches to crime. Merton brought about further study when he developed his 'strain theory' in the 1930's during the 'great depression' where there were large amounts of unemployment and changes occurring at that time in the US. Merton believed...

Find Another Essay On Critically compare and contrast traditional marxist and functionalist perspectives on crime.

Critically compare and contrast the community psychology and public health approaches to social problems

876 words - 4 pages My aim in this paper is to analyse community psychology and public health and distinguish between the two approaches. Community Psychology focuses on economic, environmental, political and social factors that influence the way in which people all over the world live their lives. It also touches on social factors that contribute or causes problems in various societies. Public Health on the other hand, according to Tutorial Letter 102/0/2014, is

Write a sociological essay with regards to Crime and Deviance with a Functionalist perspective then critique it with a Marxist view

1156 words - 5 pages . They ignore the role of society in determining crime and place it on the labels that people are given. People are only criminals if they are labelled so. This may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and then a moral career in crime as a result of the label, rather than society that shapes the individual.In conclusion, the Marxist explanation sees the power of the bourgeoisie as central to law creation and law enforcement but this is too

Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation attempts to explain chapter material and compare and contrast using Marxist and Weber concepts

793 words - 3 pages Karl Marx believed in the theory of Dialectical Materialism. The "commodities" such as the machines, technology and workers are the capitalism's mean of production. Each piece has a place in the structure. The workers do not generally own the machines that he or she works on nor does he/she create the technology. He/she are merely parts or cogs in the great workings of the structure.This concept is very instantly recognizable in Chapter 8 of

Compare and Contrast the structure of "Waiting for Godot" with the structure of any traditional play

962 words - 4 pages " while they're waiting, except talk. They seem like clowns and their talk is mostly "blather", that doesn't lead to anything. (GradeSaver, 1999)In "Oedipus the King", there is a plot with causal sequence of events. The reader can reflect on why things are happening and what the causes and implications are. Plot is usually considered the central focus of dramatic art. It's the most contrived thing about drama. Life is not a plot. But in a traditional

Compare & Contrast Essay: Crime & Punishment

671 words - 3 pages From the formation of our country until today, not much has changed in the sense of achieving real penal reform. Within reason, the level of punishment must fit the level of crime, thus, the question of what �within reason� means is relatively up for grabs. The fact of the matter is that law is not a remote entity. Law changes by following the three guiding principles: concrete political groups, current emotion and real economic interest. As a

Critically evaluate and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Customer Boycotts. Compare and contrast two consumer boycotts and discuss appropriate microeconomic theoretical models

2588 words - 10 pages also resentment.Another disadvantage for consumers would be that some people would argue that all publicity is good publicity.Now I will compare and contrast the consumer boycott of coca cola with the consumer boycott of Nestle.Coca cola is the worlds fastest selling non-alcoholic beverage and the consumer boycott of it started on the 22nd July 2003. The reason behind the boycott is because they are accused of complicity in the assassination of 8

Critically compare and contrast the ‘Best Fit’, ‘Best Practice’ and ‘Resource-Based View’, models of HRM strategy and explain how each approach is argued to contribute to improved organisational...

2484 words - 10 pages Critically compare and contrast the 'Best Fit', 'Best Practice' and 'Resource-Based View', models of HRM strategy and explain how each approach is argued to contribute to improved organisational performance.Strategy is the skill and planning that are involved in governing resources. In a business sense this relates to "a set of ideas, policies and practices which management adopt in order to achieve a people management objective" in studying

The Functionalist and Marxist Views on the Purpose of Socialisation

2309 words - 9 pages The Functionalist and Marxist Views on the Purpose of Socialisation Functionalists and Marxists have very similar theories as to the socialisation process. I intend to show this and compare these similarities. There are many well-known functionalists but I am mainly focusing on the views of Talcott Parsons and Emile Durkheim in particular. There are many aspects of the socialisation process to cover both

Comparing the Marxist and Functionalist Views on the Role of Education in Industrial Society

1928 words - 8 pages Comparing the Marxist and Functionalist Views on the Role of Education in Industrial Society The functionalists and the Marxists both believe that the education system benefits everyone, but both have different views on society. The Marxist views of the education system are that there are conflicts because there is an inequality between the working class and the higher classes. They believe that there are two different

Gender Inequality According to Functionalist and Marxist Feminist Perspective

1043 words - 4 pages sister even though the boy is usually the youngest in the family (2011). This is how the media stamps expectations for what men and women are suppose to be in the minds of children. In conclusion, gender inequality is still present today. Both the functionalist and Marxist-feminist perspectives provide reasons for this inequality, however, none of them provide a solution. The functionalist perspective believes men and women have distinct qualities

Examine Functionalist and Marxist explanations of the family

662 words - 3 pages Functionalists and Marxist diverse had views on the family. Functionalist theory asserts that there will be a specific pattern of family organisation corresponding to different types of society. Hence there is a particular family form that best suits the conditions of industrial society.The family described by modern functionalists is very much a description of the sort of families they might have been brought up within and formed them. This is

Similar Essays

Compare And Contrast Functionalist And Marxist Theories Of Stratification

1550 words - 6 pages Compare and ContrastFunctionalist and Marxist Theories of StratificationStratification is the separation of society into layers which are distinguished by unequal rewards and life chances and many systems of stratification have been based on slavery, caste and feudalism.Slavery, being the oldest and most extreme form of stratification, involves the enslavement or ownership of others. This ownership came about as a result of conquest, trade

The Marxist And Functionalist Perspectives On The Family

1285 words - 5 pages The Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family For the purpose of this essay question I will discuss the Marxist and the Functionalist perspectives on the Family. I will compare and contrast them and give a critical analysis of each and place them in historical context as well as modern day. In Britain today there are many different types of families. A social unit living together defines what a family is. The

Compare, Contrast And Evaluate The Sociological Perspectives On The Ro

1255 words - 5 pages The role of education is to educate individuals within society and to prepare and qualify them for work in the economy as well as helping to integrate individuals into society and teach them the norms, values and morals of society. Yet there are three sociological theories that differ greatly between them on the role of education. These are Functionalism, Marxism and Liberalism.      Functionalists view the role of

Compare And Contrast Between Rwanda And Darfur Genocide, From The Constructivism And Realism Perspectives

1500 words - 6 pages nationalism and a conflict of ethnic populations that were living in close proximity. However, in the Rwandan genocide, the state is more centralized, compact, and effective. This is what explains the intensity and variation. The international response to these genocides through observers emphasized on using the genocide label to create domestic constituencies especially in the Rwandan case. The Darfur case however, revealed that both of these