Criticism Of Pascal's Wager Essay

1537 words - 6 pages

The proof for the existence of God is an issue that may never be resolved. It has caused division among families and friends, nations and society. The answer to the question “does God exist?” is almost an impossible one to give with certainty seeing that there is a variety of people, ideas, cultures and beliefs. So how does one know if one’s actions here on earth could have eternal consequences? What is, if any, a “safe bet” to make? Blaise Pascal was a 15th century philosopher and a mathematician who proposed the idea that although one cannot know for certain that God exists, one can make a “safe bet” that it is far better to believe in God than not to believe in God. This is not a proof for the existence of God but rather an idea that suggest that if there is a God, it is in the person’s benefit to believe rather to disbelieve because the odds are in favor of the believer. This gambler-like idea is better known as “Pascal’s Wager” or “The Gambler’s Argument.” Nevertheless, this sort of play-the-ponies idea is not quite precise. Although Pascal’s Wager serves as a stepping-stone for non-believers, it is a rather vague, faithless and inaccurate argument.
Pascal’s wager takes the position of a gambler. It says that it is far more logical to believe in God because the odds are in one’s favor. Pascal lays it down on a diagram like so: if one believes in God and lives a good, moral, and Christian life and in the end finds that God exists, that person has hit the jack-pot, if I may, gaining eternal life in the presence of God. At the same time, if the aforementioned person comes to the end of life and finds out that God does not exist, then that person really did not loose all that much. Sure probably missed a few parties, didn’t drink as much, stayed off drugs and vices; in short, that person did not partake as much, or at all in all the worldly pleasures that most of mankind engages in. But even so, when thought about it carefully, that person lived an admirable life—a life to be proud of. All the earthly pleasures mentioned above will not take a great deal of importance at the end of that person’s life. Thus, one can conclude that even though the person in a sense did “waste” time praying, going to Mass, offering sacrifices, perhaps in the priesthood, living a chaste and celibate life, and fasting, all of these things were not for the detriment of the person but for the benefit of the person.
On the other hand Pascal presents another situation in his argument. If a person does not believe in God and lives a completely sinful lifestyle—partying, receiving all pleasures, drinking, doing heroin, having a blast—and in the end finds out that there is not a God, then that person is “free” in a sense. That person will not be eternally condemned for all the wrongdoing that person did in life. In Pascal’s final scenario, he presents an alternative outcome to the previous situation. If the aforementioned person comes to the end of life to find out that...

Find Another Essay On Criticism of Pascal's Wager

Pascals wager Essay

1508 words - 6 pages their time concerning the existence of God? Have the true believers all been hoaxed into one big illusion? Although a person will not actually be able to find out the truth until they are dead, Pascal compared the gains and losses of believing there is a God during your finite life. Before one is aloud to critique Pascal's Wager, one must first answer the question, "What is Pascal's Wager?".Though Reason alone cannot lead us to God, Pascal

Blaise Pascal's essay "The Wager" and three well-known objections to it.

1077 words - 4 pages Blaise Pascal's "The Wager" is not an argument for the existence of God but rather an argument as to why one should believe in the Christian God. It may seem like a good idea but in my opinion Pascal fails to make a valid argument. In the following essay I will present a summary of "The Wager" and present a few explanations as to why I think it is not a good idea to take the wager. There are many more reasons why it is not a good idea but I will

Pascal's Wager

1535 words - 6 pages correctly not believing in God, such as the scientific advancements. Although well-intended, Pascal’s Wager may be the weakest justification for God’s existence, and theists would be better off attempting to argue again for the existence of a Sun God. Works Cited Bendz, Fredrik. "Pascal's Wager." Update Computer Club, 12 Dec. 1998. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. . Drange, Theodore M. "Pascal's

The Existence of God

1724 words - 7 pages for the Existence of God.” Intervarsity Press, 1994. Web. 27 April 2014. Monton, Bradley. "Mixed Strategies Can't Evade Pascal's Wager." Analysis 71.4 (2011): 642-645. Religion and Philosophy Collection. Web. 26 Apr. 2014. Saka, Paul. “Pascal’s Wager about God.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web. 29 April 2014.

Pascal’s Wager

1018 words - 4 pages eventually they will become a believer. The second criticism of Pascal’s Wager is known as the “many-gods objection.” This argument is critical of Pascal’s argument because Pascal only acknowledges the existence of atheism, agnosticism, and Christianity as possible belief systems. The obvious this reason is brought up in response to Pascal’s argument is the fact that there are an infinite number of belief systems a person could have and still

Pascal and his life table.

780 words - 3 pages after its founder Cornelis Jansen (1585-1636) in 1646 when Pascal's father had an accident and was cared for by Jansenists. After Pascal's father died in 1651, his sister became a nun at a Port Royal convent run by the Jansenists. From 1652 to 1654 Pascal turned away from religious interests spending his time with gamblers, womanizers and free thinkers. However, on the night of Nov. 23, 1654 Pascal had a conversion experience. In 1655 Pascal

Blaise Pascal

1428 words - 6 pages Equilibrium. This explained Pascal’s law of pressure. Pascal once said "Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us consider the two possibilities. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Hesitate not, then, to wager that He is"(3). Just as Pascal's Triangle talked about wagering he wagered on God. It was a leap of faith. Pascal was born a Christian. In 1646 Pascal converted to Jansenism. Soon after he moved

Philosophy: Reason vs. Revelation, Asses the extent to which faith is more valid if based on reason rather than revelation.

762 words - 3 pages special experiences. The emphasis though is on revelation through authority, notably sacred writings, ratherthan through ordinary human experience.Thereforethe propositional concept of revelation may lead to a voluntarist approach to faith. This the acceptance of beliefs about God by a deliberate act of will, rather than on the concept of relationship. Pascal took the voluntarist approach to faith. 'Pascal's Wager' states that 'If we wager our

Descartes and Knowing with Certainty of God's Existence

1075 words - 4 pages Pascal would totally disagree. As Pascal's metaphor of a wager shows we have to make a best guess and take our chances. Reason cannot prove undeniably that god exists, nor that he does not exist. Pascal's view is that we can know only through our heart. For Pascal this is the way to know the universe best. Descartes thought that we could trust our reason because it was God given. Because Descartes recognized God, who is not a deceiver, he feels he

A Pragmatic God

951 words - 4 pages a confined lifestyle, or for the atheist a limited lifetime. These consequences, or the fear of these consequences, are what drives most people to their beliefs. They suffer from the great fear of the unknown and because of this they make sure to cover all of their tracks, this is the basis of Pascal's argument "The Wager." In order to have belief in something there should be irrevocable evidence pointing to its existence, unfortunately

Assessment of the View that it is Rational to Believe that there is a God

1058 words - 4 pages talking about whether or not it is rational to believe in god. Pascal for instance thinks that you should believe in God as you will gain more from it when you pass away if he does exist, i.e. going to heaven, whereas if you don't believe in God and it turns out he does in fact exists you will lose more. This is often referred to as Pascal's wager and Pascal is a prudentialist, which means believing in something because

Similar Essays

A Critical Discussion Of Blaise Pascal's The Wager

2069 words - 8 pages A Critical Discussion of Blaise Pascal's The Wager     In the gambling world bets are made based on odds, the probability or likelihood that something would happen. In the court of law, cases are decided upon by the weight of evidence presented by the respective parties. The common link between these general scenarios is that decisions are made based on some outside evidential factor. The more probable something is likely to happen, or the

Pascal's Wager: An Argument For Belief In God Using Logic, Reasoning, And Decision Theory

776 words - 3 pages is conveyed undiminished to every part of the fluid and to the surfaces of its container" (Wikipedia), the Pascaline: the second mechanical calculator, capable of calculating numbers out to 9,999,999, and Pascal's Wager: a logical reason to believe in God. All of these landmarks in his life took place before his religious conversion except the Wager. In 1654, Pascal converted to Christianity, abandoned all work on science and mathmatics and began

Philosophy Argument Blaise Pascal's Gamble

1226 words - 5 pages found the same thing as well), and other works of math. As a scientist, he invented the hydraulic press and the syringe. He also did a lot of work on pressure, hence the name of the unit of pressure. As a religious philosopher, Blaise Pascal investigated the existence of God and came up with an answer unlike any other philosopher before him.Blaise Pascal's answer was called "Pascal's Wager" or "Pascal's Gambit". "Pascal's Wager" is an argument which

Pascal's Wager: An Unsafe Bet Essay

1538 words - 6 pages Christopher McKinney10/15/2014Introduction to PhilosophyPaper 1Pascal's Wager: An Unsafe BetIn this paper, I will argue that Blaise Pascal, in his work Yes, Faith is a Logical Bet, under-represents the possible number of outcomes after death based upon belief and non-belief. More specifically, I will argue that Pascal's wager is not a safe bet, and has holes in its theory - namely, 1) that there are multiple religious faiths who believe firmly