Critique Of The Ontological Argument Essay

926 words - 4 pages

Are human beings morally obliged to be mutually honest in a true friendship? Can a real friendship continue without honesty? For instance, let’s say friend A is good friends with both friends B and C, whom happen to be married with each other. Friend A finds out that husband B is having extra-marital sex without the consent of wife C. Should Friend A be honest to husband B’s wife C? I believe that friend A does have an obligation to tell wife C about husband B’s affair.
In order for us to argue in support of honesty, we must bring in a lexical definition of friendship. A general definition is “the state of being friends” in which “mutual trust and support” between one another is ...view middle of the document...

On the other hand, he may not lose a friend, but would feel like they were the cause of the husband and wife separating. In order to avoid this anguish and guilt, friend A decides to not say anything.
There are possible solutions to this dilemma. Friend A could either: 1) choose to tell the truth and bear the consequences that are outside their control or 2) not say anything, but dissolve the friendships with both husband B and wife C because of a lack of mutual dishonesty. I believe most people would discard choice number 2. I also believe that many people would find it very difficult to choose option number 1. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that sometimes certain choices have to be made, not for the sake of our own selves, but for the sake of something greater than it, in this case, the friendship.
How could we go on about choosing option 1? Option 1 is a difficult scenario. However, we must keep in mind that friend A, up to this point, has done absolutely nothing wrong. The wrongness would be based on his choice of dishonesty towards the husband B and wife C. One may ask, why is friend A being dishonest to both friends B, and C?
Friend A’s dishonesty towards wife C is based on not telling the truth and failing to be mutually honest and supportive. A mutually honest friend would say the truth, regardless of the consequences, while a mutually supportive friend would give comfort to the individual friend that is suffering.
On the other hand, friend A’s trust fails with husband B because...

Find Another Essay On Critique of the Ontological Argument

The Ontological Argument Essay

3667 words - 15 pages Outline and discuss the various forms of the Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument. Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. "˜Onto' means "˜being', the ontological argument is an a priori argument. And ontological argument for God's existence is an attempt to prove rationally that God exists, without referring to Scriptures or otherwise. It differs from other arguments of that kind by taking as

The Ontological Argument Essay

1442 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument   The Ontological Argument, put forth by Saint Anselm in his Proslogium, attempts to prove the existence of God simply by the fact that we have a particular concept of God - that God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Saint Anselm presents a convincing argument that many people view as the work of a genius. It is also quite often considered a failure because, in William L. Rowe's words

Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

1211 words - 5 pages Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Ontological Argument - A Level - Information

1525 words - 7 pages Key Concepts The ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of God purely through reasoning, from his definition as the greatest or most perfect being. It takes its name from the Greek word ontos, meaning ‘existence’, because it is concerned with logical proof of God’s existence as part of his nature. It is an a priori argument, which means that it is based upon pure reasoning rather than empirical evidence or experience. It uses

"The Ontological Argument": Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes

1584 words - 6 pages a) Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes. (33 marks)The ontological argument is a deductive a priori argument that attempts to prove God's existence from logical reasoning. The first and best known ontological argument was proposed by St Anselm (Archbishop of Canterbury) in his writings 'Proslogion', however since then variations have been developed by other philosophers such as Rene

Anselms Ontological Argument And The Philosophers

1838 words - 7 pages Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Philosophers      Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God's existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. It shows no sign of going away soon. It is an argument based solely on reason, distinguishing it from other arguments for the

The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

1562 words - 6 pages The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already

Explain Anselm’s version of the Ontological Argument for proving God’s existence and Gaunilo’s criticism

1033 words - 5 pages . To conclude, Anselm’s ontological argument is based purely on reason. Therefore, you must already believe in the idea of God existing in order to accept this argument. This is the a priori aspect of this argument. However, as this argument uses your own logic alone, it does pose contradicting issues which Gaunilo’s critique highlighted. Nevertheless, it is remarkable that Anselm’s version of the Ontological argument was based on mind’s logic, rather than revelation as it is very difficult to construct a concept without your environment having an effect on your findings.

Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

1402 words - 6 pages Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument Aquinas's 3rd way suggests that the world consists of contingent beings. As all contingent beings have a cause, namely another contingent being, there must have been a time when nothing existed, (unless contingent beings exist as a brute fact). Therefore, contingent beings could not have come into existence unless there is a necessary being which is non- contingent that caused

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon

Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God

1647 words - 7 pages In the fifth Meditation, Descartes presents his second argument for the existence of God. Descartes holds that existence is perfection and so, it can be a predicate for God. I will first explain what is the ontological argument for the existence of God. Next, I will discuss why Descartes decides to bring God into His method of philosophy. I will then try to argue that existence is a perfection and that as a predicate for God, existence reveal

Similar Essays

Explain The Development Of The Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages Explain the development of the Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument was constructed differently to arguments such as, the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument. Whilst, these two were developed through revelation by drawing conclusions from observing external factors. The Ontological Argument was brought together through reason, this is the process of drawing conclusions through the mind’s logic. The Ontological Argument

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument

983 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not

Exploring The Ontological Argument Essay

2212 words - 9 pages Exploring the Ontological Argument For nearly a thousand years, the ontological argument has captured the attention of philosophers. The ontological argument was revolutionary in its sequence from thought to reality. It was an argument that did not require any corresponding experiment in reality; it functioned without the necessity of empirical data. Despite flaws and problems found in some ontological arguments and the objections raised to

The Ontological Argument Essay

1593 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the