Critiquing Nursing Research Essay

2762 words - 11 pages

Through the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) code of professional conduct (NMC, 2004) nurses supply high standards of care to patients and clients. One code nurses adhere to is clause 6 which pronounces nurses must maintain professional knowledge and competence, have a responsibility to deliver care based on current evidence, best practice and validated research (NMC, 2004). Validated research involves critiquing and acquiring the skills of synthesis and critical analysis, this enables nurses to distinguish the relationship between theory and practice in nursing (Hendry & Farley 1998).This assignment will critique the research paper "Patients' case - notes: look but don't touch" written by Bebbington, Parkin, James, Chichester and Kubiak (2003) (Appendix 1) using Benton and Comack's (2000) framework (Appendix 2). This was selected because of the publicity that surrounds hospital acquired infection (Barrett, 2005).TitleThe framework suggests the title should be concise, informative, clearly specify the content and indicate the research approach. The title of the paper is concise; however it gives no information of content or research subject. Moreover the research approach is unidentified consequently the reader is unsure what kind of research has been performed, perhaps an alternate title could have been "Case notes, do they pass infection: A quantitative study". This may indicate that the authors have not used a standard format which Benton (2000) states reports should follow; nevertheless the title captured the imagination of the reader and warrants further reading.AuthorsAccording to the framework, the author(s) should possess appropriate academic and professional qualifications and experience; this according to Carter & Porter (2000) establishes integrity. The qualifications and experiences of the authors are not documented. This could indicate the authors have no relevant qualifications or experiences in this field. However further reading identifies where the authors work which could be relevant to their subject, although there is no indication of their occupation. However the reader performed an online search and found the authors have had previous papers published suggesting research experience, which gives confidence in their abilities.AbstractThe framework states an abstract should be included, should identify the research problem, state the hypotheses, outline the methodology, give details of the sample subjects and report major findings. The abstract is included and is outlined which makes it distinctive and captures the attention. Burns and Grove (2003) states this helps to influence the reader to read the remainder of the report. Additionally a distinctive abstract is beneficial for a rapid summary (Parahoo, 1997). The search question is included and is noticed immediately on the first line. Also incorporated are the methodology, sample subjects and major findings. Yet they do not state the hypothesis. The abstract is...

Find Another Essay On Critiquing nursing research

Research in Nursing Essay

1743 words - 7 pages Critiquing research As a central feature of national research and development strategies, clinical effectiveness emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimental research in nursing (Gillibrand et al, 2002). Research in its broadest sense is an attempt to gain solutions to problems (Clark, 1987). More precisely, it is a collection of data in a rigorously controlled situation for the purpose of prediction or exploration. Nurses must be

Research Critique of New Graduates' Perceptions of Clinical Practice

848 words - 3 pages Research Critique of New Graduates' Perceptions of Clinical Practice The article involved in this research critique focuses on the "stresses and challenges experienced by graduate nurses in clinical practice during their initial orientation period and examines the relationship of social support to these stresses" (Oermann, 1997). The critiquing of this article will address the purpose of the article, the design of the research, the

Nursing Research

3027 words - 12 pages Benton and Cormack as her critiquing framework as she found it the easiest one to use.There are many definitions of nursing research, Benton and Cormack (2001) defines nursing research as an attempt to increase the sum of what is known this process of research consists of a series of steps, which need to be followed logically.TITLEBenton and Cormack (2001), state that it is important to make the title explicit and reasonably brief when describing

A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating Caring in Nursing Simulation

1427 words - 6 pages . Nursing Education Perspective, 33(6), 406-409. Retrieved from Kaplan, L. (2012, October 2012). Reading and Critiquing a Research Article. American Nurse Today, 7(10). Retrieved from LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Inc. Research Rundowns > Quantitative Methods > Instrumentation, Validity, Reliability

Nursing research.

10154 words - 41 pages social Sciences. UK: Biddles Ltd.Lewis, D.M. and Barnes, C. (1997). Critiquing the Research Literature. In P, Smith (ed). Research Mindedness for Practice: An Interactive Approach for Nursing and Health Care. New York: Churchill Livingstone.LoBiondo-Wood, G. and Haber, J. (1994). Nursing Research: Methods, Critical Appraisals and Utilization. 3rd Edition. Missouri: Mosby-year book inc.Neiswiadomy, R.M. (1998). Foundations of Nursing Research

Nursing research.

5107 words - 20 pages social Sciences. UK: Biddles Ltd.Lewis, D.M. and Barnes, C. (1997). Critiquing the Research Literature. In P, Smith (ed). Research Mindedness for Practice: An Interactive Approach for Nursing and Health Care. New York: Churchill Livingstone.LoBiondo-Wood, G. and Haber, J. (1994). Nursing Research: Methods, Critical Appraisals and Utilization. 3rd Edition. Missouri: Mosby-year book inc.Neiswiadomy, R.M. (1998). Foundations of Nursing Research

Evaluating a Health Promotion Website

858 words - 3 pages In order to provide the best possible care for the patients in their care nurses should determine the most effective and accurate handover. Therefore, Analizing the level of data retained or lost from employing different handover methods is crucial. Here the above paper with be critiqued using the step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research (Coughlan, Cronin and Ryan, 2007). In defining quantitative research

Ethics in Nursing Research

2112 words - 8 pages ethical conduct or misconduct of the research teams involved. This report will attempt to determine if ethical issues or concerns are evident in the information provided in each document.Overview of Quantitative ArticleThe quantitative article, "Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation", is a study in which the practice of protocol-directed sedation during mechanical ventilation is compared to non

Sexual Satisfaction and Sexual Health Among University Students

1936 words - 8 pages possess, they are more than capable of accurately analyzing and correlating the results consistently.   References Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16, No 11, 658-663. Fast Facts. (2012). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98 Higgins, J. A., Mullinax, M., Trussell, J., Davidson Sr., K., & Moore, N. B. (2011

Research In Clinical Practise

11450 words - 46 pages Research In Clinical Practise Introduction to Portfolio The research articles to be critiqued relate to the author’s area of practice; community nursing and in particular; the cost-effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics. The author currently manages a leg ulcer clinic and an insight into the research underpinning their cost-effectiveness would be of benefit in her quest to deliver evidence-based practice in

Research Methods For Practice (How Myocardial Infarction (MI) Affects the Quality of Life Of Patients.

3018 words - 12 pages is happening in practice is very essential. Moreover the writer believes that knowledge of nursing is needed in order to enhance her professional practice. Cormark (1996), states that research has an important role to play in helping nursing establish a scientific base of knowledge for its practice.It has come to the realisation of the writer that critiquing will help her to decide how findings from studies can be best incorporated into practice

Similar Essays

Critique On The Nursing Article Critical Care Patients’ Experience Of The Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

2784 words - 11 pages This assignment aims to critically analyse a chosen nursing research article “Critical care patients’ experience of the helmet continuous positive airway pressure” by Dimech (2011) and was published in the Journal of Nursing in Critical Care (JNCC). It will examine both the strengths and limitations of the study by weighing various elements of the research undertaken and its value and implication for nursing practice. It will use a critiquing

The Step By Step Approach: Guidelines To Writing A Literature Review

1277 words - 5 pages state of the topic; critiquing the literature justifies the sources and their relevance for inclusion in the review, following these steps should conclude in a literature review that highlights the significant aspects of a topic in a logical order that allows the reader to understand the context and relation to a research question (Polit & Beck, 2013). References Aaron, L. (2008). Writing & research. writing a literature review article

Reporting The Findings From Research

790 words - 3 pages ., Coughlan, M., Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing. 16(12), 738-744. Retrieved October 04, 2011, from: http://www.fchs.ac.ae/fchs/uploads/Files/Semester%202%20-%202010-2011/2200NRS/steps%20of%20lit%20rev%202.pdf Strategic Management Society. (2011). Submission of Manuscripts. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from: http://smj.strategicmanagement.net/submissions.php Thurner, S. & Hanel1, R. (2010). Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average.

Qualitative Research Review Of The Use Of Patient Simulators In Nursing Education

1585 words - 6 pages -based practice (8th ed.). St, Louis: Elsevier. Powell-Laney, S. K. (2010). The use of human patient simulators to enhance the clinical decision making of nursing students (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-745.