There are many current approaches at understanding cultural and it's dynamics. In each, the researcher is attempting to break down a culture and understand how to combine cultures to work together. Cultural dynamics are much more complicated than this and are often wrapped up in not only the culture itself but also the resources available to that culture. Organizational cultures must become anchored in not only these resources but the deep substance of a culture in order to allow enough change between the cultures to function.
There has been much optimism since the "global revolution" as to how well an organization will do when it goes "global." There has also been much risk in the acquisition and merger of organizations from various cultures in an effort to create organizations that are compatible and profitable. The expectation is that these multicultural organizations appeal to more customers, creating an organization that can get ahead of all the rest. The risk is greater than has been thought as the assumption has been that all cultures can learn to get along in a commercial situation, even if they remain different under other circumstances (Cartwright, 2002). However, that has not always shown to be the case. This is beginning to show itself in the high numbers of mergers and acquisitions that have recently occurred and then failed. Takeover bids are common these days and may very well create some of the issues of failure. Cross-border mergers have increased by about nine times of what they were just a few years ago. Many of these takeovers and mergers fail because there is actually a production slow down based of the inability of two or more distinct cultures of people unable to work together.
Culture is dynamic, everything about the human is immersed in cultural belief. It refers to everything that makes up a way of life. This includes language, which is the oldest institutional medium of expression, thought which is what creates perception of others and understanding of the world, spirituality which is the values system that determines through generations of learning how life will be expressed and interaction which is the human contact and how that give and take of socialization occurs through negotiation, protocol, and conventions (Cartwright, 2002). It is the cumulative deposit of all knowledge in the human function. It affects experience, beliefs, values, attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial relationships, concepts of the universe, and material objects and possessions. In other words, it is everything the human is. In "merging acquisitions" the human presence is ask to merge cultures. How can that happen when the term culture meets this definition? How can the human change everything ever learned through history about their culture or presence in the world in order to make a profit? This writer believes that this is not possible.
It is the belief that one's own culture is superior...