Culture Relativism Essay

848 words - 3 pages

Culture Relativism


Culture Relativism is a contradictory theory for the explanation of the way we ought to live because the roots of the theory don’t give any explanation for what is right and wrong but instead only a means for right and wrong to be judged.
By no fathom of the imagination can one contend that his or her own self ideas are correct there are certain bias that come with all judgments on the correct way to live, but if culture relativism stood true than it must be able to give some sort of universal truth. To produce a theory that says in its entirety the correct way to live depends on the culture you were brought up in and that is a truth contradicts itself.
Culture relativists contend that this is a truth all people are different and we all have different moral codes. I think for the most we do, but to what does this argument mean?
For all intents and purposes a true person accepts the means of diversity and the right for a person to believe what they want, oh wait I guess if I were to say that and be a culture relativist I would have to listen to someone tell me that in country X they think that everyone should think just alike and if you stray from that you will get shot. I would listen to the way things worked in country X and smile and say “different strokes for different folks”. Just because someone is raised in a different culture and has certain beliefs is one thing, but there are certain inalienable stances in this world that must be right or wrong (at least in theory) and making these stances and believing they are true would be an absolute impossibility for culture relativists. Because no matter what you would believe, you would also have to believe that someone else was as equally correct as yourself.
Although I do understand the rational of understanding there are different cultures and quite frankly many of them have very good reasoning for the things they do, I would like to point out the case study that was looked at in James Rachel’s essays, The Elements of Moral Philosophy Rachel’s makes a clear distinction in the essay about the habits of Eskimos to commit infanticide and genocide of the elderly.
Then a very thought-provoking rational was extended to the reasoning behind such cases, Eskimos are a very isolated and nomadic group the ability to...

Find Another Essay On Culture Relativism

education Essay

525 words - 2 pages Culture relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context. In other words ''right'' and ''wrong'' are cultural specific; what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another. Since no universal standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another society's customs. Cultural relativism is widely accepted in modern anthropology. Cultural

Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism Essay

797 words - 3 pages In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in

Theory: Moral Relativism

1910 words - 8 pages progress. Moral Relativism implies that there does not exist a culture-independent criterion of moral right and wrong, and thus each moral principle is as valid as others. It then follows that no one can criticize any moral code and there could be no moral progress. But such conclusion is inconsistent with what actually happens in history. Many social reformers strived to improve the moral codes of their society, replacing the old, less-justified

Philosophy

3719 words - 15 pages culture could claim access to any absolute system of values beyond that. Since Boaz and Mead were anthropologists, this gave cultural relativism the dignity, not just of a philosophical theory, but of a scientific discovery. Strong statements about cultural relativism are also associated with another famous anthropologist, and friend of Mead's, Ruth Benedict. Today the anthropological empirical evidence that cultures are different is usually regarded

right and wrong

857 words - 3 pages In the passage, Ethical Relativism: Who's to Judge What's Right and Wrong? had a absolutist point of view. As an absolutist, I agree and think it is not what culture defines as moral to actually be moral at all. For example, If I start believing in a pebble and tell everyone that the pebble is a god; They believe in it yet it doesn't make it wholly universally moral.Ethical relativism refers to the values of cultures, not being questioned or

Relativism between Societies

1338 words - 5 pages The meta-ethical theory of relativism claims that there is no universal moral standard that can be used to evaluate the practices and beliefs of other cultures. For the relativist, 'true' only means 'true for my culture', while at the same time, what someone in another culture deems as true, regardless of the contrast, can be equally so (Williams 1976: 34). This means that the criterion for what is deemed acceptable for a given society, is

moral relativism

645 words - 3 pages culture. That is, whether the action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society that is practiced (Velasquez, Andre, Shanks, S.J. & Meyer, 1992).Creating a guide for Americans using moral relativism would allow a general guide for society to adhere to and use as a reference when making moral decisions and/ or consequences based on these choices one has chosen to make. This thought coincides with the Week 5 reading about Meta

Critical Analysis of Ethical Relativism

1376 words - 6 pages Relativism has been developed on the basis that there is no common set of values that can apply to everyone, as there are an infinite number of cultures that exist and clash with each other. Morality is extremely relative, so the best way to solve a moral dilemma is by analysing the conditions of the specific culture to which it applies. In this paper, I will be discussing and analysing Ethical Relativism and the ways it can be applied to moral

Moral right and wrong are just a matter of opinion.

1547 words - 6 pages circumstance, and differences in culture are differences in circumstance which can and do effect moral right and wrong without involving moral relativism. Even when circumstances are basically the same, simple differences do not disprove absolutism.Every one of us lives our lives by a certain set of moral principles, we have to be able to justify our moral principles. Justification is what deals with determining right action and appropriate beliefs

Meta-Ethical Cultural Relativism

976 words - 4 pages cultural relativism implies that what is 'good' is what is 'socially approved' in a given culture. Two arguments in favour of cultural relativism are the 'Cultural Differences argument' and the 'Argument from the virtue of tolerance', the following essay will look at and evaluate both of these arguments. The cultural differences argument goes like this; 'Different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no one correct set of moral

phil

774 words - 4 pages “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” was written by James Rachels. He is an American philosopher and he was specialized in animal rights and ethics. In this writing, he mainly talks about the cultural and human’s morals. First he talks about every single culture have different moral codes. They all have different ways to worship, rituals, celebrations and rules so “what is thought right within one group may be utterly abhorrent to the

Similar Essays

A Summary Of Epistemic Relativism Essay

1181 words - 5 pages “epistemic relativism” and “social relativism"” (Chin-Chung 314) Hyperreality is a term used to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced post-modern societies. Umberto Eco explains this idea of hyperreality by relating it to the American culture that he explored during his travels. His travels, of course lead him to the "absolutely fake cities," Disneyland and

What Exactly Is Cultural Relativism In Metaethics? Is Cultural Relativism True? Can Cultural Relativists Uphold The Principle Of Cultural Tolerance?

2125 words - 9 pages universal or culturally-neutral moral standard which can be justified throughout all societies, at all times. This indicates that there is no objective truth in morality and judgments of 'right' and 'wrong' are simply matters of opinion confined to a certain culture. Hence, Cultural Relativism is the belief that the truth or falsity of moraljudgments or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the convictions or

"What Exactly Is "Cultural Relativism" In Metaethics? Is Cultural Relatisim True? Can Cultural Relativists Uphold The Principle Of Cultural Tolerance?

2380 words - 10 pages Cultural relativism is one of many alternatives within the domain of metaethics, a theory relating to moral judgments and whether they are truth-apt (capable of being true or false). This theory is supported by Ruth Benedict as she argues that normality is relative to culture, to be morally "good" tantamount with normal, so therefore morality is relative to culture. However her statement that normality is synonymous with being morally good is

The Development Of Epistemic Relativism Versus Social Relativism

1598 words - 6 pages “epistemic relativism” and “social relativism".” Hyperreality is a term used to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced post-modern societies. Umberto Eco explains this idea of hyperreality by relating it to the American culture that he explored during his travels. His travels of course lead him to the "absolutely fake cities," Disneyland and Disney World