This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Death Penalty Debate Essay

1887 words - 8 pages

Why is the death penalty still allowed throughout much of the U.S.? The process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical, and there is great debate as to whether the death penalty actually works as a deterrent. Retribution and biasness have contributed too many that have received this sentence, considering all this, life imprisonment is best for all, realistically, and most effective. The advantages of life imprisonment far more outweigh the death sentence.

Death Penalty
America has always had a history of using the death penalty, but no subject has received greater debate. There are many reasons why the death penalty should not be used in America, first there is not data that shows that the death penalty acts as deterrence, second the costs of imposing the death penalty is astronomical, third, many see the death penalty as a form of retribution, and finally, the extensive appeals through the court. Although, it has since been reversed, Furman v. Georgia has shown that there are many cases in which there is a question as to how the death penalty is imposed, and can be considered Cruel and Unusual. (NAKELL, 1978)
Many believe that the death penalty is a deterrence, however many studies on deterrence and the death penalty do not support this idea, in fact the murder rates in states that do not have the death penalty is consistently lower than in the states with the death penalty. Studies have also shown that of the 16,503 homicides in 2003, only 144 were sentenced to death, and of the 3374 inmates on death row only 65 were executed. When criminals commit crimes such as murder, the threat of execution does not enter their minds, especially those who may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In the end the death penalty is no more a deterrence than life without parole. However, once criminals are in prison serving a life sentence, they often settle into a routine and are less of a threat to commit violence than other prisoners, thus the safety of society can still be assured without using the death penalty. (NAKELL, 1978)
The death penalty is much more expensive than life imprisonment without parole. Capital trails are longer and more expensive at every step than other murder trials. Capital cases tend to last several years and can consist of pretrial motions, expert witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials; one on guilt and the other on sentencing. Once an individual is sentenced to death, the case automatically gets appealed to the state, then to the Court of Appeals and finally to the Supreme Court. Guilty pleas in capital punishment cases are almost unheard of, plus many of these trials result in life sentences anyway, so the state in which the trial is held ends up paying for the costs of the capital case. The extreme costs of capital punishment are actually making America less safe because financial and legal resources are being diverted from effective crime fighting. When a...

Find Another Essay On Death Penalty Debate

Death Penalty – A Debate over Law and Morality

2305 words - 10 pages the death penalty. If the state had executed McDuff, there would be no more innocent person being murdered cruelly. The supporters find that the destruction caused by any murder is too much to tolerate, that the criminal justice system must do everything to prevent such tragedies. It seems that two sides of the debate over death penalty have used all of their persuasive arguments to present their position. For the violation of human rights

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1300 words - 6 pages The death penalty is a source of capital punishment that is still being used today in many places including the United States. The death penalty is when someone is killed for a crime they've committed. Many states still take part in the death penalty, only eighteen states don't have an enforced death penalty regulation. The death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment, those who have committed a crime should be punished

A Debate of the Death Penalty

1481 words - 6 pages The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital

Should Capital Punishment Still be Used in the American System

1511 words - 6 pages process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was not violated by a single proceeding in a capital case in which both guilt and punishment were decided” (http://issues.abc-clio.com/Analyze/Display/1528747). With the question of constitutionality and cruelty, it is no surprise why the death penalty is a big debate in America. 1. Side 1: Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important device for protecting “law and order.” Proponents of the

The Death Penalty Is Morally Unjustified

1186 words - 5 pages , the number of executions and death sentence has decreased tremendously over the years. (Dieter, 2011) With the European Union and the Human Right Watch pressing for the abolishment of death penalty, there is much disparity and debate among the citizens of the United States of America on whether the death penalty should be continued or abolished. For the advocates of the death penalty, they champion death penalty as the only way to make

The Death Penalty

920 words - 4 pages , and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could

The Death Penalty: A Discussion on Its Pros and Cons

1293 words - 5 pages traffickers and therefore fuelled debate on how fitting the punishment is in such cases. For all it aims to achieve, the death penalty has well documented weaknesses, not least of which is its brutality and finality, and it is these frailties that lead to the calls for its abolishment. The death penalty is inhumane, wrongly applied and completely unjustifiable irrespective of the crime. Life imprisonment without parole or pardon achieves all that the death

Unlawful Justice; It is about the death penalty and how it is wrong

978 words - 4 pages around 80% of Americans favored executing convicted murders. According to the polls now it is at 66 percent that is a major drop. In ten or twenty years will we even have the death penalty? Now for the first time for a very long time people can debate whether we should have the death penalty or not. Governor George Ryan of Illinois started up the train to debate the death penalty and has it moving. Many states in the U.S. are looking over the

The Death Penalty and Violations of Human Rights

2681 words - 11 pages A contentious issue in current debate is the death penalty and its application in society. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, occurs when a individual is punished by execution as a consequence of an offence they committed (Taylor, 2014). Although Australia does not practice the death penalty, many countries continue to employ it as a means of justice and uphold its value in society. The death penalty debate is a multifaceted

The Death Penalty

1744 words - 7 pages murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. The debate on the good reason of the death penalty has raged on for a long time. On one hand, there are those who hold the opinion that the death penalty is a unkind punishment, which is both morally wrong and a violation of the right to life for its dead. Others defend their opposite views by citing the wave of abolition of other types of physical punishment, such as

The Death Penalty - Overview of the death penalty including history

589 words - 2 pages different views on what constituted the "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. More than 600 death row inmates who had been sentenced to death between 1967 and 1972 had their death sentences lifted as a result of Furman.A big debate concerning the death penalty is determining the Constitutionality of the Death Penalty such as in the particular case, Furman v. Georgia. In Gregg v. Georgia of 1976, the death penalty was

Similar Essays

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1768 words - 7 pages ) Today, thirty-four states in the United States of America still practice the death penalty as a means of punishment for capital offenses and heinous crimes. The death penalty debate is one that Americans are no strangers to; it has been abolished and repealed numerous times throughout our history. Two of the first influential cases dates back to 1968, US v. Jackson and Witherspoon v. Illinois. In each of these cases, the Supreme Court began

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1881 words - 8 pages States specifically, the issue has great significance to the bill of rights and the 8th amendment, which prevents cruel and unusual punishment. The death sentence, due to the intense debate on its morality and constitutionality, as well as the many conflicting decisions made about it until this day, still is and will likely remain a very controversial issue in the United States. The death penalty has existed almost as long as civilization itself

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

3234 words - 13 pages arrested in Malaysia in 1983. Because of tough Malaysian anti-drug laws, anyone carrying more than 15 grams of heroin is liable for the death penalty. Despite many appeals and public debate, Chambers and Barlow were hanged on the 7th July 1986 in Kuala Lumpur.The second case is that of Eric Edgar Cooke, a Western Australian serial killer and burglar. In jail, Cooke admitted to have committed more than two hundred thefts, five hit-and-run offences

Abetment/ Retention Of Death Penalty: A Debate

4378 words - 18 pages SHOULD INDIA ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY?A Debate on Abetment/ Retention of The Death PenaltyLegal MethodsRishi Aneja08D6043II SemesterSchool of Law, Christ UniversityTable Of CasesBachan Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1982 SC 1325)Furman v. State of Georgia, (1972) 408 US 239Gregg v. Georgia, (1976) 428 US 153Jagmohan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 947Jurek v. Texas, (1976) 428 US 262Kehar Singh v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1988 SC