Death Penalty Essay: The Barbaric Practice Of Capital Punishment

3558 words - 14 pages

The Barbaric Practice of Capital Punishment

 
       Rarely has any issue across the world faced such fierce debate as the practice of sentencing convicted persons to death. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, was until the last few centuries, a widespread and common event, applicable for even a minor offense. As society and culture have evolved, however, the barbaric practice has come under close scrutiny. Today, many first-world countries have outlawed the death penalty in all but the rarest instances, such as treason during wartime.

 

The United States, however, which has stood at the forefront of the fight for global human rights, still uses the death penalty liberally, and can apply it for a great many crimes. This archaic and primitive practice rightly leads other nations to question the United States' self-appointed leadership for global human rights. As many have that have closely examined the practice have concluded, this practice in the United States is not only impractical, immoral, but also fraught with error to such a degree that it could be easily outlawed. The unfortunate part, as many inside and outside our great nation believe, is that it is not.

 

The development of societies and their governments lead naturally to systems of laws and punishments. Originally, there were far more illegal acts than exist today, and the punishments were harsher, since an advanced prison system had not been developed. The basic premise of any legal system worldwide has always been simple, however: to take those who pose a threat to society and to remove them from it. The next act of choosing to actually kill these people was never a necessary act for society. Instead, it was a form of retributive justice, or revenge.

 

This simple and very human instinct for revenge shaped much of our original thoughts on punishment. Hammurabi's Code, as well as the Bible referred to "eye for an eye." "Proponents and opponents of capital punishment probably concede that there is an element of revenge in retributive justice-maybe the largest element in it-and that it may be the reason for the masses' continued support for the death penalty." (Hook 82) As societies have advanced, however, the act of killing a murderer seems to be the only act for which we maintained this vengeful idea. We do not rape the rapist, abuse and abuser, or burn down an arsonist's house, so why do we continue to kill the killer? Does not this sort of act on behalf of the state seem a bit hypocritical to the masses? George Bernard Shaw was of the opinion that, "murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another, but similars that breed their kind." (Hook 61) This we are led to question whether murder by the state acts as a deterrent to the public, as its proponents have always claimed, or whether it merely serves to condone death.

 

            The proponents of the death penalty have from the very beginning made their single...

Find Another Essay On Death Penalty Essay: The Barbaric Practice of Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty Maintains Justice

1213 words - 5 pages dissuade others from capital crimes. Certainly, the threat of the ultimate penalty may give pause to a small percentage, but most capital cases involve a defendant who is far from rational enough to weigh the costs and benefits of his action. Still, this misconception of the death penalty as a deterrent is one limp argument constantly trotted out against capital punishment. Many people ask, "If the death penalty is working, why isn't the

Capital Punishment Essay - Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?

746 words - 3 pages women commit about 15% of all criminal homicides"(Death Penalty). Discrimination of social classes is also an issue. "A defendant's poverty, lack of firm social roots in the community, inadequate legal representation at trial or on appeal"(Death Penalty) affects the ruling immensely. Killing someone with malicious intent is the same for all people no matter what their sex or race. No one person should go without severe punishment because of

Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition.

1108 words - 4 pages Capital PunishmentI will argue for the claim that Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition.My argument centers on the simple violation of human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the U.N. in 1948, asserts "the right of every individual to protection from deprivation of life". It states that no person shall be subjected to cruel or

Capital Punishment is Barbaric

1054 words - 4 pages Capital Punishment is Barbaric Capitol punishment has not always been a controversial issue. For most of history, most governments have punished numerous crimes by way of death. However, in the mid-18th century critics of this form of punishment began to emphasize the worth of the individual. They considered these practices unjust. The controversy and debate continue today. The first significant movement to the abolishment of the death

Capital punishment, the legal infliction of the death penalty

1337 words - 5 pages Capital punishment is the legal infliction the death penalty. It is obviously the most severe form of criminal punishment. (Bedau1) Capital punishment is a controversial way of dealing with violent criminals. The main alternative to the death penalty is life in prison. Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years as a means of eradicating criminals. A giant debate started between supporters and opposers of execution, over the

Capital Punishment, the lawful infliction of the death penalty

874 words - 3 pages Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty, and since ancienttimes has been used as punishment for a wide variety of offenses ( Software ToolworksEncyclopedia: Capital Punishment ). The standard for this judgment is that thepunishment must be based on the severity of the offense. 'Murder, for example is widelyconsidered an offense meriting the death penalty- In which case is called a capitaloffense-or life imprisonment

Capital Punishment Essay - True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty

1104 words - 4 pages True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty       The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian).  The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning

The Death Penalty (essay gives reasons for and against capital punishment).

728 words - 3 pages There are many different views on capital punishment. There is really no sitting on the fence between supporting it and opposing it. The reasons people give for their viewpoints are equally valid no matter which side of the fence they do stand on. Capital punishment will never stop being a hot-button issue of debate in society.Regardless of the view taken on the death penalty, a few things need to be considered. It is literally a matter of life

Death Penalty: Capital Punishment and Violent Crime

1590 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment and Violent Crime Hypothesis Most Americans are pro-death penalty, even though they don't really believe that it is an effective deterrent to violent crime. Those who are pro-death penalty will remain so, even if faced with the best arguments of anti-death penalty activists and told to assume the arguments were absolutely true. Violent crime Violent crime is a major problem in the United States. According to

Death penalty. Paper supporting capital punishment

1914 words - 8 pages The American Heritage Dictionary defines capital punishment as 'the penalty of death for the commission of crime.' The death sentence has been applied since ancient times as punishment for crimes ranging from petty theft to murder. In 1976, U.S. states began creating a bifurcated trial procedure that would legally allow imposing the sentence of death. The states did so in response to the 1972 (Furman vs. Georgia) Supreme court decision which

"Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent Murder" talks about the negative aspects of the death penalty.

1396 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent MurderCapital punishment has always been a controversial topic. Applied already in the ancient times, executions have always been a part of our lives. Nevertheless, more and more countries abolished this kind of penalty because they started to doubt its fairness and reliability. Amnesty International states on its website that" an average of three countries per year have abolished the death penalty since 1976

Similar Essays

Capital Punishment Essay: Hypocrisy Of The Death Penalty

653 words - 3 pages capital punishment but the most premeditated of murders, to which no criminal's deed, however calculated it may be, can be compared? For there to be equivalence, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life.  

Capital Punishment The Death Penalty

565 words - 2 pages case of capital punishment, various polls report that seventy percent of Americans are in favor of the death sentence. That is a clear majority. So called experts are free to petition grievances and speak freely according to our constitution. But the fact of the matter is seven out of ten Americans have evaluated the dilemma of capital punishment according to their own values and beliefs. Their conclusion was favorable to the death penalty. At

Capital Punishment Death Penalty Essay

1506 words - 6 pages killed. It would cost much less money if the criminal was killed the same way they killed the victim, and as soon as it happened. If a person killed someone by shooting them, the state has to pay for all the expenses to lock him up. They also would then have to pay for the punishment, whether it is life in jail or the death penalty, it will turn out to cost thousands and thousands of dollars. Compare that to the price it would cost if the method of

Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty Is Good For The Economy

1320 words - 5 pages murderers should be given the death penalty and have it carried out at once. The death penalty is a controversial sentence. Not everyone feels the same way, but I believe that, in America, the death penalty for murderers is beneficial to the economy and it's a punishment that fits the crime. Anti-death penalty supporters argue the death penalty is unconstitutional -- "Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is