This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Death Penalty: Why It Is Moral And Humane.

691 words - 3 pages

The Death PenaltyFor several decades the death penalty has been a litigious issue. Numerous intellectuals as well as the general public often debate the morality of capital punishment and whether or not it should be legal. The death penalty should be legal because of the theory of "an eye for an eye", how it helps in reducing murders, and the fact that the death penalty is not inhumane.Though there is no question in many minds of American citizens that the death penalty should be legal, there are still the select few that have reasons for opposing capital punishment. It is felt that many of the prisoners executed were guiltless and did not get an unbiased trial. The idea of innocent people being put to death literally makes people nauseous. Others believe that the death penalty violates the constitution under the "cruel and unusual punishments" section. The decision of which criminals deserve the death for their actions and which do not causes many citizens to lean away from execution as a penalty.One of the principal theories of the Middle Ages was "an eye for an eye", which means something like "do unto others as you would have them do unto you". How dare a person take the very life of another living being? A person has control of his or her own destiny, and no other human should have the right to take that control away. However, when they do, something more than the life sentence should be given. Thousands of convicted murderers sit securely in jail sucking up the tax money of people who choose to abide by the laws. It is truly disgusting to hear of these despicable human beings living a more comfortable life in prison than many people will ever live. It is as a spokesperson once said: "Murderers should suffer, and life imprisonment is insufficient suffering as retribution for taking a life."(Bedau, 1978; Finkcenauer, 1988).Though it is not scientifically proven that the threat of the death penalty drastically reduces murders, it is a very strong idea. It is hard not to see...

Find Another Essay On Death Penalty: why it is moral and humane.

Why the US needs the Death Penalty

2869 words - 11 pages of capital punishment (Lowe). The underlying purpose of the death penalty is to make criminals think twice about the murder or crime they are about to commit because their own life is at stake if he or she is caught and convicted. In short the death penalty would be accomplishing it goal by making the criminal search their personal moral values. The criminals will ask themselves if the murder is worth risking their lives for if they get caught

Why the Federal Government Must Abolish the Death Penalty

1339 words - 5 pages the federal government must abolish the death penalty - it weakens US moral authority over other nations; there have been too many wrongful convictions for death penalty in the US; the death penalty is in conflict with the 8th amendment of the US constitution; and finally, the cost of death penalty prosecution compared to sentencing someone to life in prison is very high. The United States is among the minority of nations that still practice

Paper on why the death penalty shouldn't be used

1360 words - 5 pages these include: the death penalty is not an effective deterrent, it is applied unfairly to minorities, several innocent people have been on death row and later found to be innocent and set free, and the death penalty, in most cases, costs more than life in prison. Advocates of the death penalty argue that it is a good form of punishment because it shows potential criminals that committing a crime can bring about dire consequences. At first

Capital Punishment~Right or Wrong? Essay about the different views involving the death penalty and why they might feel that way

646 words - 3 pages Capital punishment, or the death penalty is one of the mostdebated issues in the Criminal Justice Sysem and is a verycontroversial issue among society. The two most commonviews are either completely for or against capitalpunishment. Most arguments against the death penalty arefor moral reason. They view it as cruel and unusualpunishment, whereas aguements for the death penalty say "aneye for an eye."One of the main arguements for capital

Death Penalty: Is it worth it?

1828 words - 8 pages Death Penalty: Is it worth it? Capital punishment has been used throughout history. The severity of the crime has varied in this country and many other countries in which the death penalty has been carried out. We assume that the fear of receiving punishment or justice will deter murder. The fact is there isn't any reason to keep the death penalty. The reason death penalty is used instead of just life in prison is said to be a means to deter

Unlawful Justice; It is about the death penalty and how it is wrong

978 words - 4 pages penalty has some major mess-ups. Nobody is going to be able to correct those fullyand the only way to stop the mess-ups is to abolish the death penalty. Many innocent people are killed and a lot of jurors are racist and judge the crime poorly. Almost half of the countries in the world have abolished it why shouldn't we.What if you were wrongly accused of committing a crime and were put to death would justice have been served I think not. Do you

Injustices of the Justice System. Why do wrongful convictions of the death penalty occur? This research paper describes many reasons for why wrongful convictions occur

997 words - 4 pages know which person is the suspect, the eyewitness doing the photographic line up understands that the suspect might or might not be in the line up; and the witness is absolutely certain they have identified the right person (http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/392/eyewitness/eyelect01.htm). A noble idea would be to only use the death penalty in cases that do not mainly rely on eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence.In conclusion there are

Should We Abolish the Death Penalty, or is it Reliable?

1086 words - 5 pages people argue that the death penalty should be abolished because of the negative impact on American morals, others argue the exact opposite and believe that it should remain because it is an important deterrent to future crimes. Opponents of the death penalty view that it objectifies our morals and is too expensive. One article in the Buffalo News explains that compensation for unlawful acts is necessary for our society, however it should not be

The Death Penalty - This essay is against it

1972 words - 8 pages time consuming, because of the appeal after appeal process, the price tag at the end is generous. Word of advice, these attorney's are getting rich off of the people's tax dollars. Why not use our tax dollars to convert America into a safer place to live, instead of wasting it on the death penalty? The money saved could be distributed to the juvenile justice system, victim assistance, offender re-entry programs, substance abuse programs and police

Is Death Penalty Justifiable?

1933 words - 8 pages self-defense is unacceptable and should be punished. Few, if any, however, are willing to do so.Consider also the scenario of protecting someone else's life. Are police officers (the state) justified in killing attempted murderers to save a victim's life? If the answer to this question is yes, then no moral arguments will stand up against the death penalty. It is a fact that murderers murder again. To prevent this, the state is justified in

'The death penalty is justified because it - and it alone - pays proper respect to the importance of human life.' What is your view on this?

1305 words - 5 pages . Freedoms of individuals should, theoretically, be respected and unhindered but it cannot, and must not, infringe on another's rights. If one takes away the right to life of another person (as murder clearly does), at that moment he himself has already forfeited his right to life.Instead let us examine how the death penalty serves to protect the people, and why in the administration of the death penalty, it is not hypocritical. There are the

Similar Essays

History Of The Death Penalty And Why It Is Not Wrong

4058 words - 17 pages all crimes; and in the Fifth Century B.C.'s Roman law of the Twelve Tablets. Death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement. Now in today’s society the most common methods of execution are; firing squad, hanging, and in recent years: lethal injection which is undeniably more humane than any other form of execution throughout history. The death penalty has been used to

Death Penalty Fair, Just And Moral Essay

1094 words - 4 pages punishment. Some Christians think that death penalty is wrong from the moral and religious points of view. Although it is true that one of the commandments in the Bible is "Thou shalt not kill" we have to remember that the phrase refers to a murder of one human being by another and as mentioned earlier, although execution of a murderer and murder of the innocent both result in death, they are completely different things.Executions are fair and apply

Reason Why Death Penalty Should Be Implimented

885 words - 4 pages decision is impaired and as for the drugs and alcohol, people who intake drugs or alcohol are not in their proper selves when the effects of alcohol and drugs is in their brain. So why bother implement the death penalty if there is no absolute proof that death penalty can lessen crime rates. Death penalty is a way of rehabilitating criminals. However, it just destroys any chance for the criminals to reform. Because the criminals were already executed

Why The Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt?" It has long been argued that an appropriate term of imprisonment should be the maximum available penalty for a violent offense. This argument has been supported by the fact that our legal system, though highly evolved and altogether expedient, is far from infallible, and in recognition of this the penalties imposed under it should be both reversible and humane. The imposition of the penalty of death should no longer be exercised in