Defining Success In The War On Terrorism

1587 words - 6 pages

Defining Success in the War on Terrorism

In pursuing its war on terrorism, the Bush administration faces daunting military and diplomatic challenges. But need it also worry about mobilizing public support? With the latest polls showing the public giving the president 90 percent approval ratings and endorsing the use of force at the same level, could the White House possibly hope for any more backing from the American people?

 

President Bush seems to think so. Every speech he gives appears to be primarily concerned with shoring up public opinion, warning us about the difficulties ahead and purposefully praising Americans for their "patience and resolve." The administration understands a basic truth about leading a democracy in war: Public support must never be taken for granted.

 

Even in allegedly "easy-to-support" wars, like World War II, political leaders have found it necessary to adjust the military tempo to boost public morale. All the more so in the current campaign, where the course is uncertain and the prospects for immediate success are bleak. Ironically, the initial wave of solidarity behind Bush actually intensifies concern, because there is no way the president can hold on to stratospheric approval ratings. As his support returns to more realistic levels, the headlines could become "Bush Approval Plummets." Implicit message: "Bush Is Losing the War."

 

Research has shown that public support of a military campaign is chiefly a function of the mission's perceived stakes, the prospects for victory and the anticipated costs. Since the Persian Gulf War (though the seeds can be traced as far back as Vietnam), a myth has taken root among policymakers that only the costs matter -- that the public will only support policies that are "cheap" in the sense of not costing American lives. According to this view, the public rejected U.S. intervention in Somalia because American soldiers died, while it accepted our actions in Kosovo because no Americans died. This is the myth of the casualty-phobic public -- a canard that genuinely casualty-phobic policymakers have found expedient, but which has left America vulnerable to exactly the kind of terrorist attack we just witnessed. What is Osama bin Laden's fundamental premise if not the belief that killing some Americans will drive our country to its knees?

 

Actually, the public will support even a costly war provided the stakes warrant it and the president can persuasively promise victory. In this instance, the stakes could not be higher. What is lacking is a compelling account of victory, a frame for war aims that shapes how the public will interpret unfolding events.

 

Early attempts at providing such a frame were hopelessly, if understandably, grandiose. The administration has appropriately retreated from its vow to "rid the world of evil," "rid the world of evildoers," or even "rid the world of terrorists." Worthy goals but simply unachievable. The...

Find Another Essay On Defining Success in the War on Terrorism

Success and Failure in the US-Mexico War on Drugs

3266 words - 13 pages success of Mexico’s new administration, the legalization argument is picking up steam as a viable and cost-effective alternative to the United States war on drugs. In addition to the arguments regarding freedom of choice, fiscal irresponsibility, and the opportunity costs of drug war financing, advocates of legalization firmly believe that the negative consequences of the current U.S. drug policy outweigh those which would result from free

Islam and the Present War on Terrorism

7614 words - 30 pages wish.4. Israel is born by uprooting the Palestinians from their motherland. Terrorist activities of the Jews against the British and the Arabs were at its pinnacle at that period . After 9/11, the US has attacked Afghanistan and Iraq in the name of fight against terrorism without any logical reason or proof for their argument. Moreover, the US president George W Bush termed the war on terrorism as crusade and termed the war on Afghanistan as

Dangers of the War on Terrorism

2947 words - 12 pages success and proportionality of ends at the least. Take this speech by the President to further complicate the matter when he summarizes some points on the war on terrorism, “3,000 arrested in various countries; intensified border patrol; Increased screeners in airports.” So then, does this appear to be an actual war, or more a situation of increased security. Furthermore in this non-conventional war it is evident by this statement and sheer

Freedom And The War On Terrorism

1326 words - 6 pages judgment. The American public got rid of a potential terrorism threat after this episode, however there were heavy economical and moral sacrifices made to achieve it. There were numerous casualties on both sides and the reputation of American forces was tarnished all over the world in wake of events such as 'Abu-Gareeb'. War never impregnates hope but misery, cruelty and tyranny. 655,000 excess deaths of Iraqi civilian have been recorded up to

What is the War on Terrorism

1439 words - 6 pages memorial marathon in order to come back from the bombing one year later. America wants to prevent terrorism instead of getting the Middle East back because they do not want to be bullies, they want to be peaceful. In other words, you do not want to start the war you want to end it. www.PBS.org page 2 Some precautionary steps for the security of Americans are cracking down on airport security such as extra security guards, metal detectors, you

America’s War on Terrorism

2447 words - 10 pages have the capabilities to destroy the lives of so many. The war against terrorism which the United States is now forced to wage will not be an easily won battle. This war will not be fought solely on scattered battlefields in certain countries. It will instead permeate through every aspect of life as we know it. "The attack of September 11 will be the precipitating moment of a new kind of war that will define a new century. This war will be fought in

War on Terrorism

1510 words - 6 pages Running Header: War on TerrorismWar on TerrorismBurlington Community CollegeJames SmithAuthor note: This paper was prepared for HLSC 172-01 taught by Professor Jones.AbstractThis paper will discuss findings of research done on the internet to support the topic of why we cannot win the war on terrorism. In detail, this paper will discuss what it means to achieve victory on the war on terror, if it is possible to win the war on terror, and the

War On Terrorism

766 words - 3 pages Anais October 2, 2001 People Power Politics Tuesday night class Assignment #2 President Bush Address to Congress President Bush in this article is addressing to the nation that we will be having a Prolonged Campaign not just one battle against terrorists and terrorism. President Bush goes on to says that this Prolonged Campaign (War) will not be the War you are used to hearing or seeing about. President Bush stated this War would be against the

The War Against Terrorism

1041 words - 4 pages the United States, and supported by the United Nations, a new war on terrorism has begun. Overwhelming support worldwide has surfaced as President Bush has vowed to punish those who decide to commit terrorist acts, as well as those who harbor or condone these activities. So far Bush has followed through on his promise with the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban regime. Others are also displaying their understanding of the situation and are

Terrorism the New War

3020 words - 12 pages have to attack terrorism on an international scale, and we have to send out a clear message that we can't be bullied. As we are located directly above the U.S. we cannot say that we are neutral, we sent our troops to Afghanistan we are, as much as we don't want to admit it involved in the war against terrorism and after the recent evidence, it is recommended that we take a stronger stance on the issue of terrorism, within state borders and

The War on Terrorism Has Not Compromised Civil Liberties

676 words - 3 pages The War on Terrorism Has Not Compromised Civil Liberties In the wake of 9/11, the United States of America began to fight a war on terrorism.  Many in this country would say we actually started a war against ourselves.  One argument is the war on terrorism has begun to erode our civil liberties.  Have our civil liberties really been abused or have they been slightly altered by the Patriot Act to protect all Americans best interests?  To

Similar Essays

The War On Terrorism Essay

1598 words - 6 pages behavior throughout history . Before the nineteenth century, terrorists usually recognized innocents - people not involved in conflict - and made sure not to harm them. But now terrorist don’t care who they hurt, they just want to get they point across like the acts of September the 11th. There has been so much money spent on the American led War on Terrorism, but is it actually working or is terrorism here to stay. Environmental Issues on the War

The War On Terrorism Essay

1278 words - 5 pages organization known for its ruthless behavior and severe attacks and driven by the true nation of Islam. Many Americans wondered why such a violent organization would attack the United States, as well as, what would drive an organization to revert to such evil tactics. Upon research to answers to these questions all too often religion came into play. The nation of Islam seems to be the driving force into the war on terrorism. Religion has always been a

The War On Terrorism Essay

763 words - 3 pages articles have become typical in our modern day and age, I may one day look back on today's news topics with awe. Upon browsing and removing articles that I believe are important and interesting, I have grouped them into five chapters: The War on Terrorism, Science and Technology, World Business, Arts and Entertainment, and Editorials and Letters.September eleventh is a day that will forever impact the way we view our nation and the entire world

Human Rights Violations In The War On Terrorism

1027 words - 4 pages Following the September 11th terrorist attacks in which at least 3,000 people were killed, the United States has pursued policies that violate human rights in order to wage the war on terrorism. These policies include the adoption of new security measures, the poor treatment of captured fighters at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, and the willingness of the Bush administration to overlook human rights violations in other countries in