Defining Terrorism Essay

1088 words - 4 pages

There are many differing definitions of terrorism. What is terrorism? How do we define it? Why is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter? These are just a few of the questions that face the world on a daily basis. There are many challenges that face the international community when it comes to how to define terrorism and what it constitutes. This paper will explore the challenges facing scholars when it comes to labeling terror and discuss potential ways to properly define it.

Challenges in Defining Terrorism
Finding a proper, well-accepted definition of what constitutes terror is extremely difficult. There are many challenges that confront scholars, experts, and everyday people when it comes to defining terrorism and terrorists. Differing backgrounds and cultures of those defining terror in addition to differing histories are just one of the many challenges facing those that wish to define terror. Furthermore, labeling a group or an individual as a terrorist could be considered offensive, especially in today’s politically correct environment, potentially damaging those in the political arena. However, on the flip side, labeling someone as a terrorist can also serve a political purpose as in the case of being propaganda towards a war effort, or to help define an enemy. Nevertheless, the main problem with not being able to have a widely accepted definition of terrorism is that “It is impossible to formulate or enforce international agreements against terrorism” (Ganor, 300).
The problem with the definitions that are out there is that they are so numerous and vary so widely, it’s difficult to determine which is more accurate. Each state, nation and government has their own definition. According to John Horgan, the most acceptable definition of terrorism is “the use or threat of use of violence as a means of attempting to achieve some sort of effect within a political context” (1). However, as he mentions, it is when we go beyond this definition is when the problems arise.
Another issue is our own individual biases, perceptions, and stereotypes. In the United States, the majority of American citizens would associate a terrorist with someone from the Middle East. However, someone living in Afghanistan or Iraq could have their own idea of a terrorist as an American soldier. This goes to show that another man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter, and further proves that how we see ourselves and others is completely different than reality. These preconceived biases and stereotypes further challenge finding a accepted definition of terror.
Research into terrorism is another challenge in defining terrorism. According to James Rinehart, “those who write about terrorism, tend to possess a preconceived bias of a ‘problem-solution’ orientation in which he or she is simply attempting to justify a set of counterterrorist prescriptive” (4). This research is unreliable at best because as...

Find Another Essay On Defining Terrorism

Assignment 1

1380 words - 6 pages domestic terrorism differ on how they are investigated, they also differ on where they occur. The biggest difference between terrorism and domestic terrorism is the fact that terrorism occurs outside of the United States, where as domestic terrorism occurs on U.S. territory. This is a big difference that often times people do not understand when defining the two terms. The author previously mentioned that there is no single, universally agreed

Terrorism and Morality by Haig Khatchadourian

1866 words - 7 pages terrorism reflects the current problems in defining terrorism. Quasi-technical conceptual definition of terrorism views terrorism as an “emerging concept rather than one endowed with an established essence” (294). Khatchadourian avoids this view because it is too vague to account for the magnitude of the individual aspects of terrorism and the total effect is has on those terrorized. Khatchadourian suggests a quasi-essentialist conceptual

How to define terrorism.

1558 words - 6 pages could argue, why, if there is such difficulty attached to the act of defining it, should terrorism be defined at all? To answer, merit can be found in arguments against and for the formation of a single definition, but the more persuasive seems to be the latter. If one such definition was created, states that sponsor terrorism may attempt to persuade the international community to define terrorism in a way so that the terror groups they sponsor

The Plague of Human Civilization A paper on terrorism

1167 words - 5 pages massacre of over 3,000 innocent people. In addition to the brutality and inhumanity of killing, the cause of religious equalitarianism seems too oversimplified an explanation about what generates terrorism.As a matter of fact, defining terrorism can be very tricky and elusive. On the one hand, many people define terrorism the way the US Supreme Court defines obscenity: "I know it when I see it." On the other hand, a man can become a terrorist in

terrorism and politics

2208 words - 9 pages achieved by establishment of a supranational court of law, which will have authority to compel governments to redress injustice, or damage caused by them in the same way as national courts of law compel private individuals to redress injustice caused by them. Definition of Politics: The activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power. Political Terrorism: Defining terrorism has

Can Terrorism be morally justified? How and when? Or Why not?

2434 words - 10 pages discriminate between combatants and non-combatants" (Amstutz, 2005, p. 111). This is another element of the just war theory and acts as one of the defining features of terrorism today. It is precisely this nature of contemporary terrorism, 'the random murder of innocent people,' that prohibits Walzer (1988) from justifying a terrorist act and even if one were to grant that terrorism necessarily involves the killing of innocents, this alone doesn't

Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? If So How? If Not, Why Not?

3205 words - 13 pages believed that a terrorist act is often judged from within this "non-combatant immunity" concept. Secondly, this paper shall focus on the importance of defining terrorism and how the lack of agreement regarding the phenomena can often get confused with notions of revolutionary violence and national liberation. Finally, I shall conclude by exposing the need for a common definitional consensus on the term, if acts of political violence can be

Terrorism is not a derogatory moral classification; rather, it is a mode of warfare

1925 words - 8 pages and democracy.” The picture of terrorism when it was first used and now is different. Defining terrorism is difficult, but the most thorough definition would be that terrorism is, “the calculated and organized use or threat of indiscriminate violence to attain political or idealogical objectives." With this definition, given by Dr. Joseph Fitsanakis, there is also a comprehensive list of things that an act must fit to be terrorism by being: pre


2047 words - 8 pages terrorism. In Victor V. Ramraj and Michael Hor (Eds.), Global anti-terrorism law & policy (pp. 511-533). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ) ‘Understanding & Responding to the terrorist Phenomena’ This report brings to attention that Canadian response to terrorism does not involve a single strand but is a tangle of issues. One of the complexities it presents is the difficulty of defining what constitutes terrorism. Although the ATA sets the

Civil Liberties after 911

1262 words - 5 pages 2000: 39"Response to Sept. 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks." Centre for Democracy & Technology. 28 February 2004. <>Ganor, Boaz. "Terrorism or National Liberation." Defining Terrorism. 28 February 2004."Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms." Department of Justice Canada. 28 February 2004.Baldwin, John. "Terrorism versus Freedom." Soc 142: Socialization. 28 February 2004."Royal Assent to Bill C-36." Department of Justice Canada. 28 February 2004.

The Relationship between The Media and The Terrorism

2070 words - 9 pages United Kingdom, agrees with the articles by defining the publicity which is provided by news coverage as the "oxygen" of terrorism (Nacos 175). That massive effect of the news media creates ethical problems about the news coverage of terrorism. However, the subject is not simple enough to solve by banning the news media from making news about terrorism or terrorist activities because it can be a violation of freedom of expression. So, this paper

Similar Essays

Defining International Terrorism Essay

1895 words - 8 pages Defining international terrorism continues to be a problem fraught with difficulties. Though, several attempts have been made and continue to be made by various scholars, governments and international organizations such as the United Nations, a universally accepted definition is still a long way off, if ever it can be achieved. Such an impasse is due to various reasons. First, vested interests exist of nations using international terrorism as

Defining Success In The War On Terrorism

1587 words - 6 pages Defining Success in the War on Terrorism In pursuing its war on terrorism, the Bush administration faces daunting military and diplomatic challenges. But need it also worry about mobilizing public support? With the latest polls showing the public giving the president 90 percent approval ratings and endorsing the use of force at the same level, could the White House possibly hope for any more backing from the American people

Balls Essay

948 words - 4 pages terrorism can target certain people and no one is invulnerable to such a thing, and with these many definitions made by the people surveyed the answer is clear: the majority see terrorism as a negative act. Aside from the people, politics and media itself has a way of defining terrorism and that can be explained in Graham Murdocks Televising Terrorism. Graham examines the impact of televising terrorist acts on the people and has determined that the

Terrorism: What Is It? Essay

629 words - 3 pages considered to be terrorism.So, what is terrorism? There is no concrete definition; instead there are many, which are based on individual and self-centered views. When defining the term we tend not to ask the following: Does terrorism need to involve the killing of many people or can it affect just one person? Can it involve simply the destruction of property, with no injuries? Can governments commit acts of terrorism, or is the term reserved only