Deliberating Experiments On Obedience Essay

1370 words - 5 pages

In 1963 Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, created an experiment examining obedience. This experiment has been questioned by many psychology professionals. One psychologist Diana Baumrind transcribes her beliefs in the “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience.” Baumrind, when writing the review, was employed at the Institute of Human Development, University of California, Berkeley. In her review Baumrind denounces Milgram for his treatment of his subjects, potentially harming their self image. However, Ian Parker, a British journalist who has written for the New Yorker and Human Sciences, believes Milgram’s findings still hold a significant place in society today. In his article “Obedience” Parker focuses on the purpose of the experiments and the aftereffects on Milgram himself, differing from Baumrind’s emphasis on the unethical theories of the experiment and the aftereffects of the subjects. In their articles Baumrind and Parker believe the setting was a factor playing against the results of the experiment, both reference to the unethical beliefs of the experiment; they also dissolve the reference of Milgram’s comparison to the Nazi Party during the Holocaust.
When calling the experiment a game, one can grasp the emotions of Diana Baumrind on Stanley Milgram’s experiments. In the excerpt Baumrind presents the unethical aspects of Milgram’s experiments. She labels the laboratory an untraditional setting to conduct an experiment, saying, “the laboratory is unfamiliar as a setting and the rules of behavior ambiguous compared to a clinician’s office” (225). Throughout her article she sides with the subjects, expounding on the way the subject is being treated during the experiment. Baumrind feels they are not treated with the respect they deserve. She says it is now the norm in sociopsychological laboratory experiments to manipulate and embarrass the subjects (225). Over and over in her article Baumrind alludes to Milgram’s findings as a procedure involving a loss in dignity, self-esteem and trust in authority. Showing the mental state Milgram subsisted with after the experiment, Ian Parker’s article, “Obedience” explains the agony Milgram sensed during the time of criticism for his experiments. Also discussing Milgram’s life after the experiment, Parker informs the reader of the struggle Milgram faces when attempting to apply for a tenured job. He uses quotes from not only Milgram, but to those closest to him during the time of suffering, to express the agony in the life of Stanley Milgram.
Baumrind declares that Milgram’s experiments are unethical because of the possible harm that the teachers are exposed to during the teaching. In an article, published on Yahoo’s Associated Content, the author writes that because of Milgram lying to the subjects about what type of experiment they were participating in was the main reason of unethical interpretations (Associated Content). This reason is in agreement to Baumrind’s beliefs when...

Find Another Essay On Deliberating Experiments on Obedience

Why disobedience is neccessary Essay

1550 words - 7 pages were threated, which leaves them no choice but to carry on the dreadful act. So in the display of these aspects, why is it important that people still practice disobedience? For one, it’s important because not everyone has good intentions. Obedience towards an authority figure with bad intentions isn’t a new aspect, but there’s also evidence of how an ordinary everyday person can be dangerous to others without even realizing it. In his book The

The Milgram Experiment Essay

2024 words - 8 pages his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices? It was Stanley Milgram that was to answer the call and perform a series of experiments on the obedience of authority. When it came to selecting participants for the study, Milgram considered using Yale graduates, which

Summary Paper on The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram Response to his writing Christina Mahoney

1122 words - 4 pages the way thru occasionally acting nervous or upset. One subject in particular stated; "what appalled me was that I could possess this capacity for obedience and compliance to a central idea..."(91)Milgram's Experiments showed another interesting fact, when left to decide how much of a shock to administer to the learner, the teacher usually chose a painless level. There were very few occasions in which the teacher chose to shock at a high level we

Defying Ethics

978 words - 4 pages Stanley Milgram was a Yale psychologist that organized diverse studies during his career. In 1961, at the age of twenty-seven he conducted his most controversial study on obedience. In light of the recent Holocaust, Milgram wanted to comprehend how twelve million people were put to death simply by the orders from their commanders. The original accepted explanation was the popular notion of the authoritarian personality, but Milgram suspected the

obedience to authority

1568 words - 7 pages suffering on a person or animal, such as the Stanley Milgram experiment, which demonstrates harmful and even lethal doses of electricity from a shock generator to a human subject. The “learner” wasn’t actually being shocked, but the “teacher” at the time didn’t know that information. Fake or real, that type of shameful obedience in an experiment is not tolerable. Experiments nor its participants should ever involve harming a human, experiments such

Frankenstein

1824 words - 8 pages instance of Victor and Professor Waldman, multiple other instances arose where the characters were faced with the decision to either obey or disobey authority. Each instance of obedience and/or disobedience did not originate from the same authoritative source, yet the plot was constructed of disobedience and/or obedience to multiple authorities, such as law enforcement, education, one’s self, and the authority placed on the characters by a

title

1017 words - 5 pages Milgrams obedience experiment is a series of famous social psychology experiments. The experiments sought to elucidate and measure the subjects' willingness to obey an authority who instructs the subject to perform acts that a person would not normally like to perform for reasons of conscience (Zimbardo, 2007). One of the Milgram experiment aims was to investigate obedience and authority, in the impact on a subject's ability to harm another

Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiments

1619 words - 6 pages human psyche that seemed to show a hidden psychotic in even the most demure person. Milgram presents his startling findings in “The Perils of Obedience”. Publication created a great deal of discussion, with one of the more vocal critics being Diana Baumrind, who details her points of contention in the article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”. More than forty years later debate is still raging over Milgram’s methods, and their

A Brief Summary of Milgram's Seminal Research on Obedience to Authority

1537 words - 6 pages Milgram, a well-known social psychologist within the 1960’s focused his studies on social influence and obedience to authority. The impact of his research and experiments made such a profound discovery finding out why some subjects would obey an authority figure ordering them to admirer shocks to people and some refusing to continue. His findings made a huge contribution to the understanding of human behavior and the psyche. According to Miller

Comparing Views on Stanley Milgram's Experiment on Obedience

1168 words - 5 pages behind her article. Despite all this, Baumrind and Parker entertain consensual thoughts on the experiment, indicating there was, in fact, a problem with certain aspects of the experiment. Works Cited Baumrind, Diana. “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments of Obedience”. Writing and Reading for ACP Composition. Ed. Leahey, Thomas and Farris, Christine. New York: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2009.291-295. Print Blass, Thomas. Understanding

Conformity and Obedience

950 words - 4 pages told if they believe the voice of authority is "good." Through their experiments, Asch, Milgram and Zimbardo have proved that social influences can have a profound effect on individuality. One's desire to be accepted can make them unaware of conformity or obedience to authority. The problem lies not only within the group, but also the individual's acceptance of authority without question. Works Cited Asch, Solomon. "Opinions and Social Pressure

Similar Essays

Experiments On Obedience And Getting Opinions After Pressure

1890 words - 8 pages Experiments on Obedience." Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum, 7th ed. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman, 2000. 357-362.Meyer, Philip. "If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably." 1970. 20 Oct. 202.Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum, 7th ed. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman, 2000. 343-355.Zimbardo, Philip K. "The Stanford Prison Experiment." Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum, 7th ed. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman, 2000. 363-375.

A Synthesis Of Conscience Vs. Obedience

956 words - 4 pages tendencies ingrained in their psyche in reference to what Professors Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett believed. This concept focuses on the ethical issues involved in Milgram's experiments arguing that if subjects had felt there was an escape from obedience, Milgam' s results would have differed. Therefore, the subjects acted the way they perceived they had to behave due to the situation they were in (Parker 343). Zimbardo also questions the

The Life Of Stanley Milgram Essay

1019 words - 4 pages “It may be that we are puppets-puppets controlled by the strings of society. But at least we are puppets with perception, with awareness. And perhaps our awareness is the first step to our liberation.” Stanley Milgram made ground breaking discoveries in the field of psychology with his many experiments on obedience and people’s ability to have an effect on the actions of others. From one of his experiments was derived “The Six Degrees of

Stanley Milgram Essay

848 words - 4 pages command obedience to extraordinary measures even in the United States by virtue of their position; he also developed the concept of the six degrees of separation, an early development of networking theory (Cahnman, Hartman, 2007).” Stanley Milgram began his experiments on obedience to authority in 1961 while he was a professor at Yale University. In these experiments, Milgram invited random citizens of New Haven to come participate in a trial