Deliberative Democracy Essay

1608 words - 7 pages

Deliberative Democracy strives to bring people together, and discuss their problems in order to create a better form of governmental policy. However, some are skeptical of deliberative democracies ability to get individuals to communicate with one another in modern pluralistic societies like the US. When discussing important political matters, people have the tendency to not pay attention to the arguments of others, as they are only fixated on their own arguments. It is basic human nature for people to act in this way, which is the reason deliberative democrats have outlined certain prerequisites that must be followed, in order for deliberation to take place. Without these certain rules and regulations in the deliberation, it will simply fall apart. Even though these assumptions about how deliberation should occur are good in theory, Rosenberg suggests three significant ways in which deliberation would fail to meet these expectations expressed by deliberative democrats. In addition, the obstacle for deliberative democrats remains the issue of reaching success in cross cultural settings, where the ideals of deliberative democracy seem to unravel. These problems hinder the communication and trust that is so essential, which lead to many people having uncertainties about the effectiveness of deliberative democracy.
According to Gutman and Thompson, reciprocity, publicity, and accountability are required for a deliberation to take place, because this ensures each person has a right to speak and creates an atmosphere for open discussion. Usually, people do not want to hear one another, because they are biased by their own opinions and morals. Rather than being unreasonable to other opinions, deliberative democrats call for people to explain their opinions by giving reasons. Justification must go both ways, and by giving respect to one another deliberation can move past close minded people. Human biases pose a huge problem, because most of the time people assume their opinion is right, especially when dealing with morals. However, by using the ideas of reciprocity, publicity, and accountability, people of differing ideas can come to an understanding with each other, and maybe even find some common ground. Democratic deliberation is not about which people are right and wrong, but rather getting people to gather together and discuss the issues that matter the most. It is during this active discussion amongst people that they start to learn about each other. Most of the time, it is a lack of knowledge that separate people from one another. Once, they start to understand each other, they can actively engage in creating policies that will benefit their society. In this deliberation, everyone has a voice and all opinions are held as equal, which give the policies created legitimacy, as everyone plays an active role. Without these ideals, respect would be lost and these deliberations would be diminished to shouting matches, which would benefit nobody.

Find Another Essay On Deliberative Democracy

Democratic Deficit in Canada Essay

2127 words - 9 pages liberties, the freedom of assembly and debate, a free press, competitive political parties, consultative and deliberative exercises, and a wide variety of representative institutions” but if one of these elements is missing, it can’t be considered a true democracy. The reference regarding the secession of Quebec under the Canadian Supreme Court gives two meanings to democracy: “the procedural process of suffrage and representation, and also the

Theoretical Background Essay

1883 words - 8 pages dealt with acknowledging and giving voice to difference and discussing issues in the public realm. Also, this concept goes by many names, including ‘deliberative planning’, ‘inclusionary argumentation’, ‘participatory democracy’, and ‘discursive democracy’. Healy (1996) describes inclusionary argumentation as “public reasoning which accepts the contributions of all members of a political community and recognizes the range of ways they have of

My Explanation Of The Action Of People At Mahakarn Fort Community Through The Concepts Of Civil Society, Extra-Parliamentary Politics, Informal Politics, Participatory Democracy, And Governance

773 words - 4 pages governance. Taking part either through informal politics such as the participatory democracy civil society experienced in the film, or extra-parliamentary politics, everyone will work a step closer towards a better lifestyle that is satisfying and rationally progressing. In order to prevent such problems, the promotion of deliberative decision making process in public policy process is imperative and should be carried out thoroughly in the process

Critiques of Democracy

2129 words - 9 pages local councils and agencies in pushing for a more inclusionary role for citizens. Carmen Sirianni and Lewis Friedland write, “An independent, nonpartisan grassroots group (Oregon Health Decisions) conducted 48 open community meetings around the state to discuss underlying health values that citizens might hold in common and that might guide the reform efforts” (Deliberative Democracy). The result was the further education of health issues on a

Digital Democracy

1492 words - 6 pages Digital Democracy Over the years the media has made citizens major role players in politics. Ross Perot opened eyes by putting the 1992 Election in the media and thereby allowing voters to become directly involved in politics. The Internet, the new form of mass media “has turned into a major political and media industry” (Grossman 16). Because of the rise the Internet has taken, the idea of direct democracy has risen. The foundation of

Do we Aspire to Democracy, or is Democracy Something Achieved?

1825 words - 7 pages government and is entitled to its protection” ( Aristotle described a citizen as one “who enjoys the right of sharing in deliberative or judicial office attains thereby the status of a citizen of his state, and a state in its simplest terms, is a body of such persons adequate in number for achieving a self-sufficient existence” (Blaug & Schwarzmantel, 209). Citizens are granted with the freedom to participate in democracy, to

Paper Discussion

2067 words - 9 pages Democracy and Civil Society, Georgetown University: Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76-98. Escobar, O. (2011). The work of participation: Local deliberative policy making as mediated by public engagement practitioners. Paper presented at the 61st Conference of the Political Studies Association

Public Relations and Democratic Communications

3050 words - 12 pages (2006) claims two types of co-existence: neutral co-existence and beneficial co-existence. On one hand, PR propaganda and one specific type of democracy can be survived together in neutral co-existence. Theoretically combined with two ideal forms of democracy set by Posner (2003): deliberative and representative, in deliberative democracy, ‘people think and debate and vote as citizens’ (p: 156), which presents a model of co-operation. Comparing

Do Public Relations Enhance Democratic Communication?

3237 words - 13 pages that the relationship between public relations and democratic communication would be by Posner (2003). Posner identified two types of democracy. The first being deliberative democracy were people think and debate as ‘citizens’. The second form of democracy which Posner identified was a representative democracy which is more competitive compared to deliberative democracy. The distinction between the two models of democracy which Posner developed


1320 words - 5 pages second issue Parker focuses on is the idea of “one person, one vote”. Parker believes the act of voting is falling out of favor with many in politics, who instead favor “a narcissistic notion of “deliberative” democracy to eclipse what they imagine as the tawdry marking of a ballot.” (Parker, 313). In an article about his perceived trend towards a parliamentary government in the United States, Gerald Pomper suggested that is it time to “turn our

Unmasking Administrative Evil

1315 words - 6 pages avoided and administrators could have notice the since of abuse if they put cruelty in their consideration and had a sense of liberalism of fear. (Adams and Balfour, P.173) The second technique in the way of preventing administrative evil is the Deliberative Democracy, which is “consulting with others in a process of reaching a decision.” (Adams and Balfour, P.174) citizens professionals and administrators together build a feasible deliberative

Similar Essays

Transforming Strategic Interaction Into Deliberative Problem Solving: European Comiyology In The Foodstuffs Sector Christian Joerges And Juergen Neyer

1211 words - 5 pages Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comiyology in the foodstuffs sectorChristian Joerges and Juergen NeyerThe central argument of the contribution is that core institutional features of the European Community (EC) should be read as supranational versions of deliberationist ideals.Introduction:Deliberative model of democracy:1.securing legitimacy2.economic welfare3.a viable sense of collective

Discussion Topic Essay

1703 words - 7 pages / Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23-32. Gaventa, J., & Pettit, J. (2011). A response to Powercube: understanding power for social change. Journal Of Political Power, 4(2), 309-316. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2011.589182 Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21-39. doi: 10.1177/019145370102700402 Harrison, E. (2012

The Cure For Ills Of Democracy Is More Democracy

2850 words - 11 pages employment, public freedoms, and high growth rates for rich countries (E. Galeano, 452).Democracy is a wide conceptual field, however, some other conceptions and alternatives are open to enrich democracy and get it closer to a direct democracy. It is so that some conceptions like minimalist, pluralist, and deliberative have been elaborated.The minimalist conception of democracy is the least inspiring one, because it shows democracy as an

Aristotle's Views On Citizenship Essay

1606 words - 6 pages that citizen are those who are able to participate in the deliberative and judicial areas of government (III, 1279a32-34). However, not all who live in a political association are citizens. Women, children, slaves, and alien residents are not citizens. Some groups; the rich, the poor, those who come from noble families and the virtuous, can claim power in the state. Polis exits by nature, and human beings are naturally adapted to live in a