This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Descartes 4 Meditations On Philosophy Research Paper

2772 words - 12 pages

Meditation 4: Concerning the True and the False

Ultimately, Descartes wants to be able to distinguish between what he can know with absolute certainty—what is definitely true—and what is false. Because his old ideas were based on a precarious foundation, he was not able to do this; sometimes the things he thought were true turned out to be false and vice versa. He has identified a small number of beliefs that he thinks he can know with absolute certainty—e.g. the belief that ‘I exist,’ and ‘I am a thinking thing.’ But what about all his other beliefs? Many of his other beliefs seem to be caused by external objects and seem to provide evidence that external objects exist, but he can’t be sure about that. And he noted that as long as it is possible that an all-powerful God exists who is constantly deceiving him, he can’t be sure of anything. So in meditation 3, Descartes proved (or attempted to prove) that God exists, and now he is ready to move forward by getting clear on the possible sources of false belief, so that he can avoid those.
Here’s how Descartes starts: (53-54)
And now I seem to see a way by which I might progress from this contemplation of the true God, in
whom, namely, are hidden all the treasures of the sciences and wisdom,
to the knowledge of other things.
To begin with, I acknowledge that it is impossible for God ever to deceive me, for trickery or deception is always indicative of some imper-fection. And although the ability to deceive seems to be an indication of cleverness or power, the will to deceive undoubtedly attests to malicious-ness or weakness. Accordingly, deception is incompatible with God.
Next I experience that there is in me a certain faculty of judgment,
54 which, like everything else that is in me, I undoubtedly received from
God. And since he does not wish to deceive me, he assuredly has not
given me the sort of faculty with which I could ever make a mistake, when
I use it properly.

A few things to note:
First, we get Descartes’ very short argument for the conclusion that God is not a deceiver. If you go back to meditation 3, Descartes said that he needed to show (A) that God exists and (B) that God is not a deceiver. It might be surprising that Descartes spends to little time on (B), but I think this is because he thinks that once the main challenge (A) is overcome, other conclusions follow much more easily.
When it comes to the question of whether God is deceptive, Descartes acknowledges that, being all-powerful, God would certainly be capable of being deceptive. The main issue, then, has to do with whether or not God would choose to deceive us. Descartes thinks not. He points out that the desire to deceive comes from (and is associated with) our being finite and limited. For instance, the reason a person lies to get what they want is because they aren’t able to get what they want in any other way. If they could get what they want in some other way,...

Find Another Essay On Descartes 4 Meditations on philosophy - Research Paper

Certainty in Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

618 words - 2 pages Certainty in Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy René Descartes was the first philosopher to raise the question of how we can claim to know anything about the world with certainty. The idea is not that these doubts are probable, but that their possibility can never be entirely ruled out. If we can never be certain, how can we claim to know anything? The First Meditation of Meditations on First Philosophy, subtitled "What can be

Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

1791 words - 7 pages In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes does and experiment with wax to try to prove that things actually exist in this world. This essay is going to prove how we can tell that things actually exist and what can perceive the wax. Rene Descartes starts off with a description of the wax so he can prove to us the changes that will happen throughout his experiment. “Let us take, for instance, this

Analysis of Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

1559 words - 6 pages Rene Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes set the groundwork for seventeenth century rationalism, the view opposed by the empiricist school of thought. As a rationalist, Descartes firmly believed in reason as the principal source of knowledge. He favoured deduction and intellect over the senses and because of this he did not find comfort in believing that his opinions, which he had developed in his youth, were credible. It

The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy

1488 words - 6 pages The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy In order to embark on his quest for truth, Descartes first devises his four rules which should serve as a solid foundation for all else that he comes to understand. Those rules are here evaluated in terms of what they fail to take into consideration. The rules are examined individually and consecutively, and are therefore also reiterated in order to be

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

923 words - 4 pages Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order

Rene Descartes' Examination of the Nature of Mateial Things and What is Possible to Know of them Based on Passages from Meditations on First Philosophy. (the Wax example)

605 words - 2 pages "How do we know what we know?" This is a question asked by Rene Descartes as well as a host of other philosophers. A particular passage written in Meditations on First Philosophy by Descartes dubbed the "Wax Passage" examined the nature of material things, and what we really know about them. Descartes' thought process shall be followed, and his conclusion that if all attributes are stripped away, what is left is the "essence" of the wax, will be

Meditations on First Philosophy

992 words - 4 pages , which we don’t perceive clearly or distinctly. In fact the lack or imperfection lies in the operation of the will and it is not due to the faculties, which we have received from God. Descartes proved the existence of God by saying that since existence is inseparable from God, he really exists and God can never deceive. Works Cited Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Translated by John Cottingham. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 1996. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-modal/

Descartes' meditations: Descartes' discourse on method

1045 words - 4 pages In Descartes' First Meditation he wants to demolish his opinions so he can decipher what is true and what is false with no biases. For example, today someone may hold beliefs in the Easter Bunny and Santa Clause but later in life will learn that these are false truths. In order to do this Descartes will reject all of his opinions. Instead of attacking each issue individually he will attack the foundation on which all of these opinions are formed

Meditations on First Philosophy

1570 words - 7 pages method, radically different from the traditional Socratic Method, and uses this in order to open his eyes and see through his own false opinions. In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes utilizes his methodology of determining the truth to doubt away the foundations of all that he knows, in order to determine that he exists, what he is, how he knows this better than he knows any physical thing, and how he knows that God exists. First, the

Meditations on First Philosophy

674 words - 3 pages In The Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes explores all the methods for doubt. Descartes had to search through doubt in order to understand and eventually overcome it. In addition, Descartes could not accept anything without dismissing the total accounts of doubt. In Meditation three, Descartes is able to overcome his doubt about the evil genius and also proves that God must exist. Meanwhile, Meditation One is all about the reasons for

Meditations on First Philosophy: Interpretation

1007 words - 5 pages Throughout part one of Meditations, Descartes believes that most of the information we have discovered has just been accepted freely, without a counterargument. Descartes wants to clear his mind of all of his former opinions because he wants to find out if they are true on his own; he doesn’t want to agree with something just because many other people do. Descartes discusses how our senses can deceive us, so he thinks it is possible for people

Similar Essays

Descartes' Meditations On First Philosophy Essay

644 words - 3 pages B. MitchellK. HamstraPhilosophy RGC19 June 2003"For as long as I think; for it might perhaps happen, if I totally ceased thinking, that I would at the same time completely cease to be."-Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy: Meditations I and II (Descartes, 26)I agree with Descartes' statement. In order to experience the world in its entirety, we must be able think. Without the ability to reason, human beings are just another animal

Descartes – Meditations On First Philosophy

3389 words - 14 pages goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring about 3 key issues that are discussed throughout

Meditations On First Philosophy, By Rene Descartes

1548 words - 6 pages In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, he talks about the distinction between God and existence. This paper is going to argue that in Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, both are contrasting how we know that God really exists and how we know what we perceive in this world actually exists as well. This essay will start by talking all about Rene Descartes and his ideas around the

Rene Descartes' Meditations On First Philosophy

1968 words - 8 pages Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes’ third meditation from his book Meditations on First Philosophy, examines Descartes’ arguments for the existence of God. The purpose of this essay will be to explore Descartes’ reasoning and proofs of God’s existence. In the third meditation, Descartes states two arguments attempting to prove God’s existence, the Trademark argument and the traditional Cosmological argument