This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Descartes’ Arguments For The Existence Of Body As Distinct From The Mind And His Justifications To Princess Elizabeth Of Bohemia

1722 words - 7 pages

Descartes
Vanessa Taylor

Two years after Descartes published his meditations on first philosophy, Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia wrote with questions concerning the relationship between the immaterial soul and the corporeal body- specifically how anything immaterial could produce physical effects. She was neither the first nor the last to question this practical application of Descartes’ dualism, but her questions elicited the most comprehensive attempt to answer the question. In this paper I will examine Descartes’ arguments for the existence of body as distinct from the mind; outline Elisabeth’s objections and proposed solutions, and argue that Descartes’ responses to Elisabeth are inadequate to address the problem of mind-body interaction without resulting in contradiction.
Descartes sets out in meditation six to determine what justification there might be for the existence of external bodies and whether bodies are distinct from his mind. Not only does he conclude they are distinct, they are distinct kinds of things (with different primary attributes). (Ariew, 2009, p 62) Mind is a thinking substance, and Body is extended.
In discussing the existence of external bodies he begins with an explanation of the way the imagination differs from the intellect. The imagination depends upon something distinct from him, memories of sensations or something else that seems focused outward toward a physical world perceived through bodily senses (p. 62). This alone makes it seem probable to him that the body does exist. However, he is not so quick to conclude an external world based on that alone, nor is he so quick to doubt its existence just because it’s possible there is some faculty in himself that produces these perceptions that he isn’t aware of (p. 63). Instead he attempts to ground his belief in one of the few things he can clearly and distinctly perceive: God. (p. 64)
Descartes argues for the separation of body and mind, suggesting that: God can make everything he clearly and distinctly understands, as he understands it. He clearly and distinctly understands his essence to be that of a thinking thing. Therefore, he is distinct from his body and can exist without it, if God wills (p. 64). He also observes differences between the mind and body that suggest their separateness. The body appears utterly divisible, the mind utterly indivisible- as he has an understanding of himself as a complete entity (p.67).
He determines that imagination and sensation are modes of thought, and so require a mind to exist (p. 67). However, he can imagine existing without being able to sense or imagine, so those abilities are not required for him to exist. He cannot imagine existing without being able to think or understand, so the former must depend on something outside of him, while the latter is essential to him (p. 67). Therefore, he concludes: “The only alternative is that it is in some substance different from me, containing either formally or eminently all...

Find Another Essay On Descartes’ Arguments for the Existence of Body as Distinct from the Mind and His Justifications to Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia

Descartes' arguments for immateriality of mind/soul based on the notion of dualism: body is extended object and mind/soul is non-extended

1858 words - 7 pages , sensation and imagination, where body as extended subject, occupying the space. So he based his argument of the immateriality of mind/soul on dualism. Firstly, he made it clear that the mind and the soul is the same thing and it is the self. From this he drew that the self actually exists by asserting that the ability to reason proves his existence. Then he moves to claim that the mind and body are distinct entities and that mind can exist without

How far is Descartes’ Argument from Indivisibility successful as a justification for the need of a metaphysical distinction between mind and body?

841 words - 3 pages How far is Descartes' Argument from Indivisibility successful as a justification for the need of a metaphysical distinction between mind and body? Descartes introduces the argument from indivisibility by positing what he discerns as the fundamental difference between the mind and body, stating that "...the body is by its very nature always divisible while the mind is utterly indivisible." (Descartes, 1641 6th Mediation). The distinction is

Descartes on the Mind and Body

834 words - 4 pages incorrect. As a result Descartes has not proved that there are two distinct substances in the world and thus his understanding of substances is incorrect. According to Descartes the two substances the world is made of are matter and the mind. He states that matter is defined by its ability to be extended in space, thus anything that takes up space can be considered matter . He states that the mind is the ability to think, this means that intellectual

Descartes - Mind and Body

2270 words - 9 pages perceive. He begins to explore this notion that he had previously dismissed to doubt. He inquires whether his senses give him reason for bodies to exist. He comes to the conclusion that they do because God has given us "a great inclination to believe that these ideas proceeded from corporeal things." ( ) This proof progresses into the nature of how mind and body co-exist. Descartes beliefs are as follows: It is from nature that we distinguish other

Descartes and how he came to his conclusions on the existence of the world. This was originally used for a presentation

615 words - 2 pages , therefore I am, was so certain and so evident that all the most extravagant suppositions of the sceptics were not capable of shaking it, I judged that I could accept it without scruple as the first principle of the philosophy I was seeking" (Discourse on Method, 4:32)From this platform, he believed it possible to use our clear and distinct ideas to demonstrate the existence of god, to establish the reliability of our reason generally despite the

Descartes claims that his existence of a thinking thing is the one certain truth, which can serve as the foundation for all other knowledge

931 words - 4 pages . Although the idea of existence of a thinking thing is a stepping stone to further proceed in his argument, Descartes leaves room for no further doubt and systematically explains his reasoning.To further probe at what Descartes means by his certain true, one must know how he came to this conclusion. He is firm in his resolve to continue his search for certainty and to discard as false anything that is open to the slightest doubt. Remembering

Analyzing Individuation and Identity In Descartes´ Philosophical View of the Mind-Body Dualism

1292 words - 5 pages entity may be intimately connected to the body, however the non-corporeal entity is not a material entity as is the body. Descartes has contributed several arguments for this belief , one them was the conceivability argument which necessarily involves a degree of tautology. Descartes states that since the idea of the separate existence of the mind and body is conceivable, that it is then possible. If the possible exist that two things can exist

Analysis of Descartes’ Mind/Body Distinction

1174 words - 5 pages mind is distinct from the body is through his claim that the mind occupies no physical space and is an entity with which people think, while the body is a physical entity and cannot serve as a mechanism for thought. [1] I believe most of this portion of his position to be true. The body quite certainly has a physical presence and is not capable of controlling or thinking for itself. I begin to disagree with Descartes’ theory at the point

How did Descartes Explain the Relationship between Mind and Body?

2612 words - 10 pages . Nevertheless, Rene Descartes went further and supported that there are some functions that needs interaction between mind and body to operate (Fancher, & Rutherford, 2012). Therefore, He spent many years trying to prove his claim about this interaction. A major contribution in this work had Descartes’s royal friend and one of his greatest admirers Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia, who was interested in Descartes’s theory and especially on the

The Mind-body problem in Descartes Meditations

1402 words - 6 pages Descartes goes into is the argument for the distinction of mind and body and the existence of material objects. He starts off with the argument from knowledge. If he clearly understands an object as one thing, distinct from another, it is so. He is also certain that he exists as a thinking thing, while he isn't certain of the existence of his body. Therefore, he is a thinking thing and nothing else. His mind is distinct from his body. He is a

The mind-body relation at descartes

2861 words - 11 pages , le lipșeste puterea argumentativă pentru a clarifica această problemă. 8Bibliografie:Descartes, Rene. Meditații metafizice. Editura Crater, București, 1993. (trad. Ion Papuc)The philosophical writings of Descartes. Volume 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984. (translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothhoff, Dulagd Murdoch).Baird, F. and Kaufmann, W. (ed.), Modern Philosophy, Prentice Hall, 2008Clatterbaugh, K. The Causal Debate in Modern Philosophy 1637-1739, Routledge, 1996Cottingham, J. The rationalist. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998

Similar Essays

Descartes’ Arguments For The Real Distinction Of Mind And Body

1915 words - 8 pages Descartes’ Arguments for the Real Distinction of Mind and Body Descartes argues has three main arguments for minds and bodies being two different distinct types of substance. These are known as arguments for substance dualism and are as follows. * The Argument from doubt : Descartes argues that while he could pretend or think that he had no body and therefore did not exist in any place, he could not think or

Outline Plato’s Arguments For The Distinct Existence Of The Soul

1235 words - 5 pages Plato's arguments for the distinct existence of the soul are presented best in the Phaedo where Plato voices his opinions through a recital of Socrates "˜death bed' philosophies to present the case that the soul is immortal.The link between the argument for the immortal soul and the dualist view of the soul is rudimentary; without belief in one the other cannot be justified, as any other type of soul could not survive the bodies death.The

The Existence Of God: The Arguments Of Locke And Descartes

1366 words - 5 pages that I cannot think of God not existing, it follows that existence cannot be separated from God and thus that he actually exists." (298) The existence of God is something that cannot be separated, just as we cannot separate the idea of an ocean without sand. Descartes explains that man is a finite being. The mind grasps ideas mainly through its perception of such objects. Descartes expounds that he is a thinking thing. He goes on to say that

Essence Of Mind And Body For Descartes

1096 words - 4 pages with his argument for dualism, which is the possibility that the mind was distinct from the body. In Descartes' Mediations on First Philosophy, he is able to construct his arguments for the real distinction of mind from body, by understanding how the physical world operates based on the notions he sets. His claim will eventually be refuted because of his lack of understanding of how a non-extended mind affects an extended bodyDescartes' main