Descartes Free Will Essay

1957 words - 8 pages

In Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes attempts to explain the cause of errors in human beings. Descartes says that error occurs “since the will extends further than the intellect” (Descartes p.39). That’s because our intellect is something that is finite; it is limited to the perception of only certain things. Whereas our will, ability to choose is not limited; it is has an infinite capacity. Therefore we sometimes attempt to will things which we do not have a complete understanding of. Descartes’ argument, as I will briefly describe, is quite sound, if you agree to all his conditions (being that the intellect is limited and the will infinite). I am not, as of yet, sure if I necessarily agree to the later of his two conditions. I will strive to evaluate different discernments of what will is, and if it is truly free. Then apply it to his argument. But first let me explain Descartes’ argument on the causation of errors.
Descartes’ discussion begins in saying that “errors depend on the simultaneous concurrence of two causes: the faculty of knowing that is in me and the faculty of choosing” (Descartes p.38). I will first tackle the faculty of knowing, or intellect. Descartes says that it merely perceives and understands ideas, which can later have judgment passed on them (see Descartes p.38). The intellect is limited and finite because it can occur in different degrees. While some people have a simple understanding of a language others have a mastery of its grammar and syntax. But no one can have a mastery of all the mysteries of the universe.
Then there is the faculty of choosing, as Descartes calls it, or rather the will. Descartes says that he “experience[s] that it is limited by no boundaries whatever” (Descartes p.38). It is seen as infinite because unlike the intellect is does to adhere to different grades. It exists merely as a matter of being able to do or not to do something; to affirm or deny something proposed by one’s intellect (see Descartes p.38). In some cases one’s will is unable to make such a decision, Descartes says, not because of a fault in the will but rather because the intellect is lacking complete knowledge of the situation (see Descartes p.39). It is here that one should be indifferent to passing judgment. If in such a instance indifference is not the outcome an error is most likely to occur.
Descartes says that this error will occur only when both work together because alone they cannot produce error. That’s because intellect, in and of itself, only perceives ideas which one knows and error would only occur if one tried to perceive ideas he did not know, which is impossible. The other, the will, in that it acts of itself, is only a utility of choice which alone cannot error. Therefore error and sin occur when both intellect and will work with each other. It is the disproportion between the limit of the will and the intellect that causes blunders. The will, as I’ve stated, is a limitless aspect of ourselves and...

Find Another Essay On Descartes Free Will

Rene Descartes Essay

1259 words - 5 pages important thing people had is freedom of will. (Schultz 28). Descartes helped free the fear of inquiry from theological and traditional dogmas. ?He considered questions of God and of the soul to be matters of philosophical concern rather than theological argument,? (Watson 149). In an important party to psychology, Descartes relied more on naturalistic interpretations of things rather than super naturalistic interpretation. He got a lot of

Descartes' Dream Argument. Essay

886 words - 4 pages his beliefs and start over with only certain beliefs. To do this, Descartes will perform what he calls "methodical doubt" which is an organized and planned way of finding reasons to question one's beliefs. Descartes does this by attempting to attack the foundational beliefs that all of his beliefs rely on: his senses.Descartes calls sensory perceptions into question so that his audience will be free from sensory influence. Once his audience is in

Descartes vs Hume

1195 words - 5 pages . Additionally Descartes believed in a dualistic split of the body; a thinking self and a physical self. Dedicated to his faith and God this dualistic view came created conflict with himself. He attempted to maintain this connection to religion and science by explaining that the physical self was mandated by nature, and the thinking self was controlled by God's will (117). Hume's beliefs and his conclusion to the self is much different than Descartes

Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God

1647 words - 7 pages certain true about God. Ontological argument tries to prove the existence of God from a priori perspective, i.e., idea implanted in the human mind by God himself. The argument therefore depends on analytic reasoning, from premise to conclusion. Descartes believes that he has an inborn idea which he calls “innate” (p. 43). His ability to think did not cause the idea on his mind, but God’s free will to act. Thereby, as the idea manifest itself to

Descartes: Knowledge is Truth

1410 words - 6 pages be grounded. Descartes distinguishes between the human body and the mind, the difference between the “res extensa” and the “res cogitans.” Descartes stresses that as infants we only relied on our senses and our body, therefore we have these preconceived notions towards the world. These preconceived notions keep us from “the knowledge of the truth” (Descartes 193). In order to access the truth, we must doubt everything. Doubting everything will


1227 words - 5 pages trying to free his mind as Neo had to do because the computers only they let Neo see what they wanted him to by altering his senses, just like Descartes believes God is doing to him. I feel that his argument is weak. Descartes claimed that in order to find the real truth he must not trust anything that he was taught or knows because his senses deceived him. Let us assume that our senses do deceive us. Is there really is a big, all-powerful, evil

Descartes' Failure

5140 words - 21 pages free will. Without free will, Descartes can no longer prove the existence of God. As the foundation upon which he re-establishes his knowledge of the world depends on free will then, if my claim is true, Descartes does not succeed in finding a solid foundation for empirical knowledge, nor does he succeed in his secondary goal of proving the existence of God. I. Pure Sensation and Inference Descartes is determined to find an

Descartes - Mind and Body.

2270 words - 9 pages finite. Descartes concludes that because we are free we are responsible for our errors. It is possible however, that if we use our faculties properly we will not assent false judgments. Confident that God has created us such that if we perceive things clearly and distinctly our reasoning will not be wrong; Descartes is now free to explore the possibilities of material things and the mind body relationship. In the fifth meditation the essence of

Meditation on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes

1545 words - 6 pages unless God put it in our minds. (Some Key Arguments From Meditation III-V) So far Descartes knows that he exists, knows his understanding of intellect, and possessed a certain knowledge that God exists which comes from his intellect and not from his senses. In the fourth meditation Descartes discusses error and how error occurs. Since the mind is finite but free will is infinite, error occurs when the infinite free will surpasses the

Meditations in First Philosophy

1089 words - 4 pages as human, he will make errors it is not God's fault because he made humans in the best way. Descartes describes himself as weak and limited and asserts that intellect and free will is the cause of error. Intellect makes us think of ideas but free will actually makes one act on a bad or good idea. In “Meditation Six: Concerning the Existence of Material Things, and the Real Distinction between Mind and Body,” Descartes distinguishes the res

Weaknesses of Descartes' Arguments

1680 words - 7 pages therefore maintained free will. On the other hand, Descartes believed that the body can only be studied and explained through science. The mind was capable of free will, which has a religious connotation in that it denotes that a higher force, or God, is not controlling the minds of humans but then their minds are in control of their bodies. Then, the body was a scientific vessel that was inhabited by the Soul, or the mind, for a temporary amount of

Similar Essays

The Question Of Free Will: Descartes, Hume, And Nietzsche

2474 words - 10 pages The power of acting without necessity and acting on one’s own discretions, free will still enamors debates today, as it did in the past with philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, and Hume. There are two strong opposing views on the topic, one being determinism and the other “free will”. Determinism, or the belief a person lacks free will and all events including human actions are determined by forces outside the will of an individual contrasts

Descartes & John Locke Essay

2345 words - 9 pages that there is a general rule of truth. The third is that God exists and cannot be an evil deceiver. However, Descartes raises a question: If God exists and cannot be an evil deceiver then why are humans imperfect and perpetually making errors? Descartes explains this through the explanation of free will. Descartes states that God has given all humans free will. This is the cause of human error. Because we have free will, humans are able to make

The Meditations 400 Years Later Essay

1271 words - 6 pages is exactly what tells us this, thus leading to circular logic. A third criticism of Descartes theory is what is known as the Problem of Evil. First proposed by Theodice in response to Descartes, the problem asks, “How can we [humans] err if we were created by God’s perfection?” Descartes responds to this by enlisting what is known as “free will.” Descartes’ theory levies both Free will and the Natural Light of Reason as innate mechanisms for

If A Tree Falls In The Philosophical Forest, Someone Managed To Undermine Descartes Ambitions For Epistemology

2155 words - 9 pages intentions. Through his meditations, Descartes seeks to establish an indubitable foundation for all knowledge. More distinctively, Descartes wants to establish this foundation so that it will provide a metaphysical confirmation for the sciences. Descartes establishes what he considers indubitable knowledge by deducting from scientific laws and mathematical theorems, to find the principles that make them viable (Lightbody, Jan 17). Ultimately, by