This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Descartes: Knowledge Is Truth Essay

1410 words - 6 pages

Descartes: Knowledge is Truth
With the emergence of the scientific revolution in the 17th century, views of society and nature were transformed throughout Europe. There were great developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry. The world and its views were changing, and with that change, came a new change in thought, a new change in philosophy. Apart from ancient Greek philosophy, which was centered on finding order in a vast variety of things by searching for a fundamental amalgamating principle, Descartes sought to establish order via some fundamental division. Descartes understands and expresses that what we know about our mind is more definite than what we know about the world outside our mind. Descartes’ philosophy is completely different from that of the Greeks, where it is not about a fundamental principle, but about a fundamental knowledge.
Descartes’ examination of knowledge and where it comes from ultimately leads him to a new belief on how knowledge is acquired. Apart from previous beliefs, that knowledge comes to us through sense perception, Descartes argues that this is not the case, as instead knowledge comes to us only through applying pure reason. Descartes dismisses the notion that our senses give us knowledge because to Descartes our senses give us accidental qualities of things. In other words, we see, hear, feel, smell, and taste things the way “they are” in relation to our human body. Our senses are different than those of other animals; therefore we cannot fully rely on our senses to give us the information we need. Descartes’ famous saying, “cogito ergo sum,” is a conclusion that he reached “a priori” and not through his senses or experience. For Descartes this was an essential principle from which all other knowledge be grounded. Descartes distinguishes between the human body and the mind, the difference between the “res extensa” and the “res cogitans.” Descartes stresses that as infants we only relied on our senses and our body, therefore we have these preconceived notions towards the world. These preconceived notions keep us from “the knowledge of the truth” (Descartes 193). In order to access the truth, we must doubt everything. Doubting everything will lead to the distinction between mind and body. Once you recognize that distinction, you will recognize that “neither extension nor shape nor local motion, nor anything of this kind which is attributable to a body, belongs to our nature, but that thought alone belongs to us” (195). This thought that we have produces ideas, and these ideas are given to us by God, they are innate. Since God gave us this “faculty for knowledge […], it can never encompass any object which is not true” (203). For we are able to see the truth clearly and distinctly this way. Descartes argues that God would be a deceiver if what he gave us was able to be distorted and that we can mistake what is false as true. This is not the case, because God is not a deceiver....

Find Another Essay On Descartes: Knowledge is Truth

Mediations of First Philosophy by Descartes

1286 words - 5 pages circular reasoning. Circular reasoning is basically defining something with itself or proving something exists with itself, for example, defining water as water. Descartes uses this all the time in is arguments. The circularity can be seen by his statements being entailed by such clear and distinct perceptions that they themselves are reliant upon certain knowledge of God’s existence for their truth, yet such knowledge itself requires these

If A Tree Falls in the Philosophical Forest, Someone Managed to Undermine Descartes Ambitions for Epistemology

2155 words - 9 pages taxonomy of importance. All too often, individuals take knowledge and its power for granted. However, individuals like René Descartes and his work, The Meditations, provide a deep exploration of knowledge and all its facets. For every individual or scholar this work is very important in that it causes the reader to consider what we assume as truth and to envision a foundation for knowledge that is indubitable. The aim of this paper is to consider

Rene Descartes: French Mathematician and Philosopher

2243 words - 9 pages Vanhoozer (2005) the Discourse on Method not only sets out to prove the existence of human reality, and subsequently prove the existence of God, but also serves as "a procedure for discovering truth" (p. 9). Faced with the fact that he is capable of doubt, Descartes hypothesized that he is imperfect and since there is an order to the world and perfection outside of human existence, this is proof of an all-powerful perfect being, God. This six part

Descartes' Meditations

2321 words - 9 pages have now changed. However, he knows that the answer is in fact yes; the wax in it's new form is the same wax that used to be in it's original form. Descartes knows this to be true because of his mind, his ability to think rationally, and his ability overrules his senses, "... it is my mind that perceives it," (157). This example, more than any others, provides Descartes with acceptable knowledge and allows him to conclude the truth that the mind

Descartes' Views on the Topic of Philosophy of Mind

1134 words - 5 pages unreliable. As the body is known only through the senses, Descartes was able to doubt the existence of such a body and all other bodies for that. In meditation II however he arrives at the knowledge that doubting the mind is incoherent, as a mind is needed in order to proceed wth such doubts. Because the body can be doubted and the mind can indubitedly not Descartes concludes that they are distinct. This is known as Cartesian

Rene Descartes's View on God

1337 words - 5 pages resulted in a "new relationship between his self-knowledge and his knowledge of God" (Vrooman 60).  This came after he discovered more than just the principles of a single science and realized the unity of all the science of all knowledge.  During that night, he experienced three dreams he felt "had been sent to him by the spirit of truth which had deigned to enlighten him as to the future" (Vrooman 58). He believed that God revealed to Descartes

The Meditations 400 Years Later

1271 words - 6 pages what does not. The Natural Light of Reason is innate because if the truth detector had to be acquired there would be another regress in knowledge caused by people with “malfunctioning” or bad truth detectors. Suddenly things, whose existence could easily be doubted beforehand, could concretely exist again. Things such as his body were free to exist. In his mind, Descartes had just proven how everything in our world could exist beyond an ounce of

The Approach to Nature of Descartes and White

1269 words - 5 pages many parts as possible to better comprehend and resolve them (Descartes, 16)], enables Descartes to argue that the body, although created by nature, is material, thus, does not hold a constant truth (Descartes, 28). It is the human mind and soul in which Descartes discovers steady truth, because of his belief that God, a source of truth, instills “a rational soul” (Descartes, 34) to a human body. His faith in God also

Descartes - Ontological Argument

1044 words - 4 pages innate, some adventitious, and others to be formed by myself: for, as I have the power of understanding what is called a thing, or a truth, or a thought, it appears to me that I hold this power from no other source than my own nature," (Descartes, 10).Descartes, doubting these assertions, goes on to say that other ideas and beliefs are caused by the influences of man and nature. From childhood, all humans are born with the knowledge of a superior

Descartes vs. Peirce On Knowledge

1168 words - 5 pages already known and from that information formed a hypothesis. Peirce, unlike Descartes is not searching for an absolute theoretical truth, because he has given up the idea of absolute truth. He understood knowledge as coming from experience. To know is to grasp independent reality through the senses or by experience. Peirce would like us to make the distinction between a principle that can't be doubted and one that isn't doubted. Whereas Descartes


1227 words - 5 pages ? Even if they are logical, they must be doubted under Descartes own methodic doubt structure. Without them, he cannot prove the existence of God. Descartes is satisfied that he has adequately disproved the previous argument. Since he has done this he is now ready to lay down a new foundation of knowledge and find the “truth.” This passage reminds me of the movie “The Matrix”, in that God acts as the computers did in the Matrix. Descartes is

Similar Essays

Descartes Claims That His Existence Of A Thinking Thing Is The One Certain Truth, Which Can Serve As The Foundation For All Other Knowledge

931 words - 4 pages Descartes claims that his existence of a thinking thing is the one certain truth, which can serve as the foundation for all other knowledge. With nothing more than just the knowledge that he is a thinking thing, Descartes goes on to further meditate on more monumental topics. Not only does this realization of his existence serve as the foundation for all other knowledge, it served as the starting point of a new era of modern western philosophy

"Different Cultures Have Different Truths". "A Truth Is That Which Can Be Accepted Universally". What Are The Implications For Knowledge Of Agreeing With These Opposing Statements?

1295 words - 5 pages "Different cultures have different truths". "A truth is that which can be accepted universally". What are the implications for knowledge of agreeing with these opposing statements?The two statements are contradictory as they essentially convey opposing theories about truth; relativism - the belief that what is true is what is accepted by one's culture or community - and absolutism - the branch of thought which claims that a statement is either

Descartes’ Ultimate Purpose Of The Meditations

1836 words - 7 pages Descartes’ Ultimate Purpose of the Meditations My initial approach to René Descartes, in Meditations on First Philosophy, views the third meditation’s attempts to prove the existence of God as a way of establishing a foundation for the existence of truth, falsity, corporeal things and eventually the establishment of the sciences. When viewed in this light, Descartes is accused of drawing himself into a ‘Cartesian circle

Descartes & John Locke Essay

2345 words - 9 pages of Socrates. He argued that when a person was born their mind was empty. A person obtained knowledge through experiences. He also felt that if a person misinterpreted an experience it could lead to doubt or skepticism. Locke tries to prove Descartes wrong by saying that there are no innate ideas. He states that by understanding our own mind we can deter doubt. Locke proposes three separate possibilities about truth. The first is that there is no