This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Descartes Vs Hume Essay

1195 words - 5 pages

Tyler Barg Oct 9 2014 Professor Higgins Intro to Philosophy
Take a Position Papper #1: Descartes and Hume
The great Greek philosopher Socrates based much of his teachings on searching for the meaning to the "self." The Delphic Oracle gave him these prophetic words "know thyself" (102) which would influence his existence and others. Yet for centuries the greatest minds have yet to agree on a concrete definition of what the self is. When we look inside the nature of the human mind there is a intricate realm that is not easily explained. Everyday we live and think, but for what purpose and what is the explanation behind it? Years after Socrates' death we are still debating over the nature of the self. Does the self even exist, is the mind physical, is thought linked to the body, are just some of the questions philosophers have raised since Greek times. To debate these findings are the philosophers Rene Descartes and David Hume. Descartes a rationalist believed that truth comes from our natural gift of reason, and would argue that the self is split into a physical and conscious form. Hume on the other hand was a empiricist and believed experience gives us knowledge, and basing his beliefs on science believed that the self does not exist. Although Descartes and Hume had their similarities their teachings on the self is what separates them. Ultimately my position is one that supports Hume over Descartes. Hume's disciplines are stronger because of his less dogmatic rulings and empiricist views.
The self is an important component of philosophy that is often overlooked by the general public. Philosophers understand the need to examine it, and their desire to better understand this part of humanity is what unites them. Before we analyze how Descartes and Hume differ we should see how these two philosophers share similarities on their views on the self. To start, both thinkers understood that the self was worthy of heavy study. The self was a starting point for philosophical reflection, and it can be said that they were dedicated towards its mystery. Even though Hume did not believe in the existence of the self the same way Descartes did, he acknowledged humanities fixation with it; "our propension to confound identity with relation is so great, that we are apt to imagine something unknown and mysterious connecting the parts (126)" This shows that Hume is aware of that humans want desire unification with the body and soul even if it is fictional. How is this assertion similar to Descartes? Descartes is also aware of peoples focus on the self. He believes that humans have a dynamic identity that imagines and understands, and are aware of this constant changing. Thus we all have a distinct self. Humes believes there is no self, while Descartes does, so how are these two thinkings connected? Regardless of these opposing viewpoints, they both acknowledge that the topic of the self is something other human beings and non philosophers debate themselves. This...

Find Another Essay On Descartes vs Hume

The Question of Free Will: Descartes, Hume, and Nietzsche

2474 words - 10 pages The power of acting without necessity and acting on one’s own discretions, free will still enamors debates today, as it did in the past with philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, and Hume. There are two strong opposing views on the topic, one being determinism and the other “free will”. Determinism, or the belief a person lacks free will and all events including human actions are determined by forces outside the will of an individual contrasts

Descartes and Hume: A Look at Skepticism and Finding Stability

905 words - 4 pages René Descartes was a skeptic, and thus he believed that in order for something to be considered a true piece of knowledge, that “knowledge must have a certain stability,” (Cottingham 21). In his work, Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes concludes that in order to achieve this stability, he must start at the foundations for all of his opinions and find the basis of doubt in each of them. David Hume, however, holds a different position on

an essay with personal opinions on hume and descartes on the theory of ideas

613 words - 2 pages David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas which are, innate, adventitious and those from imagination. He stated since he exists and his idea of what a perfect being is, such as God, then God exists. Hume, on the other had, believed ideas came only from one thing, impressions. Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses but I like

Morality. Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume were all after the truth

608 words - 2 pages Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did. There goal was to arrive at true and certain knowledge.Descartes and Hobbes were both rationalists. They did not trust their senses. Senses deceive and cover up the

Morality. Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume were all after the truth

565 words - 2 pages COMPARACIÓN ENTRE RENÉ DESCARTES Y DAVID HUME. - Por un lado, Descartes es un autor perteneciente a la Modernidad (S. XVII), mientras que Hume es un ilustrado (S. XVIII) y fue contemporáneo de Rousseau. - Por otro, Descartes era racionalista (como Spinoza y Leibniz). Es decir, para él, el origen de todo conocimiento se debía la razón y las ideas innatas que ésta contiene. Sin embargo, Hume fue

Rationalism and Empiricism

1572 words - 6 pages , like two aspects of the same coin that have fused into a sphere." Bibliography: Works Cited Descartes, Rene. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Hacket Publishing Company, Inc. 1998. Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Antony Flew, ed. Chicago. Open Court Publishing Company. 1988. Steen, Francais F. Empiricism Vs. Rationalism. Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara. Mar 20, 2001

Arguments against Philosophical Skepticism

2420 words - 10 pages ‘Skepticism’ refers the theory that we do not possess any knowledge; skepticism denies any existence of justified belief. This paper discusses the varieties of philosophical skepticism and explains the various skeptical arguments and responses to philosophical skepticism, along with both Hume, and Descartes take on skepticism. This paper will also describe the various arguments against skepticism along with their justification. While the

John Locke: Illuminating Path to Life, Liberty, and Property

1375 words - 6 pages : Clarendon, 1975. Print. Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Print Markie, Peter. “Rationalism vs. Empiricism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). 2013 ed. Web. Shimomisse, Eiichi. “British Empiricism (Locke-Berkeley-Hume).” California State University, Dominguez Hills. CSUDH, 1997. Web. 1 Dec. 2013. Shimomisse, Eiichi. “The Philosophies of Enlightenment.” California State

The Republic

2154 words - 9 pages , and of the physical universe” (Gustafson 196). Descartes and Plato use reason rather than their senses to get their point across. Those that would oppose of the theories brought up by Plato and Descartes would be Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and Comte. Locke believed the mind was empty at birth and it developed through senses unlike Plato and Descartes who believed there was previous knowledge before birth (Gustafson 199). Berkeley suggests “there is an

Philosophy Overview

10212 words - 41 pages of intellectual vs. empirical apprehension]. We can know the rule-governed, rational universe because there is a fundamental affinity between human reason and rational nature of cosmos. This is what the ancient as well as the modern theorizing have in common. Hence philosophy is love of wisdom, i. e. a quest for true knowledge of the whole of being and its contemplation.There are another two common assumptions, usually called the criteria of

When the Bubble Burst

1539 words - 6 pages By the time I arrived state side from my second tour in the Middle East the housing bubble had already burst. I noticed a drastic change in the way that many of my friends and family were living. Several of my friends that worked in real estate had sold their boats and seconds houses. My own stock portfolio had lost a third of its value. My sister and her husband had defaulted on their home mortgage leaving them scrambling for a place to live. I

Similar Essays

Descartes And Hume Essay

4272 words - 17 pages , es decir, cualidades que si pertenecían al objeto, en concreto la forma, el tamaño y el movimiento, es decir, las cualidades directamente asociadas a la extensión, que según Descartes era el atributo definitorio de la materia (o res extensa). Hume, por el contrario, amplía la consideración de cualidad secundaria a todas Descartes Vs Hume 2 nuestras impresiones externas, ya que, según Hume, las

Diferencia Entre Descartes Y Hume Essay

1392 words - 6 pages La gran diferencia entre Hume y Descartes es que uno es racionalista(Descartes) y otro es empirista(Hume).Hume dice q todo conocmiento parte de l experiencia, de l q recibimos x los cinco sentidos, a lo cual llama impresiones. las ideas son copias de las impresiones y para Hume son menos fuertes y vivaces. hume negó la identidad personal (yo) ya que la mente no es mas q una sucesion de impresiones y no hay una impresion de yo, no hay

Hume, Descartes, And Nietzsche's Views On Immortality

1290 words - 6 pages of a person’s existence, even after death. Immortality primarily referred to soul as it like it does not die when the human body dies, but since they both well connected together, when the body dies, soul dies too; therefore, immortality does not exist. Hume broadens the evidence of experience shows us that thought and consciousness depends on our bodily existence and; hence, physical death must indicate death of the mind as well. He shows this

Empiricism Versus Rationalism: Descartes And Hume

645 words - 3 pages Rationalism and empiricism have always been on opposite sides of the philosophic spectrum, Rene Descartes and David Hume are the best representative of each school of thought. Descartes’ rationalism posits that deduction, reason and thus innate ideas are the only way to get to true knowledge. Empiricism on the other hand, posits that by induction, and sense perception, we may find that there are in fact no innate ideas, but that truths must be