This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Dialogues Conceringing Natural Religion Essay

903 words - 4 pages

Philo first begins his argument by stating that if God is truly dominant than he can control everything. Afterwards he continues on to state that if God was willing to avert evil but not able to than he was inept. If he is able to avert it but not willing to, he is malicious. With that being said, Philo concluded that if God truly believed in the well being of man-kind, than there would be no evil in this world.
Demea responds by stating that we are only a speck in the whole universe limited to only what we can see. What seems evil to us now may not be evil for we cannot see how everything will end. Once we look at everything as a whole, we must make the connections and understand that with God in charge, everything will work out for the best. We cannot say that God is evil when we are only looking at the world from our point of view for we cannot see the ultimate goal which God seems to have in mind. After analyzing what Demea states, one finds that he is unknowingly on the same page as Philo.
Cleanthes retorts by saying that his suppositions should never be acknowledged. He questions how any hypothesis can be proven if there is no way to tell if it is true. If one considers the likelihood of what Demea stated to be true, then we must be able to prove that it can be reality. He explains that the only way to defend divine benevolence is to oppose the evils that are sent upon us humans. Demea attempts to prove that good occurs more than the bad but we tend to focus and put emphasis on the evil more.
Philo comes back saying if he allows what Cleanthes said to be true with their being less bad than good than Cleanthes must also admit that the evils that humans suffer through is still forevermore worse than the good. It is much harder for humans to receive pleasure rather know copious amounts of pain and grief. The effects that happiness leaves on one is nothing compared to the wear and tear that pain can hold. This, in turn, cannot be proven which disproves Cleanthes argument. Philo still believes that if God was as righteous as he seems to be than he wouldn’t allow any of the evil in the world. Since evil is so prevalent, God is still malicious. Philo goes on to state that it is not possible to estimate how much pain, anguish, happiness, excitement, etc that a person has gone through to prove that Cleanthes argument was based on nothing. Even than Philo continues on saying...

Find Another Essay On Dialogues conceringing natural religion

David Hume and Karl Marx’s Critiques of Religion

1287 words - 5 pages expresses a statement that one can derive by reason alone. Religion suggests that the world operates on cause and effect and that there must be a First Cause, in this case God. In Hume’s worldview, causation is assumed but ultimately unknowable. Hume’s critique of religion at the time was very risky during the 18th century so when he wrote “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” he masked his beliefs and arguments as a story with characters

Paley vs. Hume This is a inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, and the universe

1025 words - 4 pages Paley vs. HumeI read William Paley's, "The Argument from Design", and David Hume's, "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion." What I established after reading these two arguments is that it is extraordinarily difficult to come to any conclusion about the origin of the universe and the world. Both are inductive arguments about the origin and nature of God, religion, and the universe; things that can never be proven true and absolute.In Paley's

Plato to Darwin to DNA – A Brief History

974 words - 4 pages BIO 11 Lab Queens College This book has been molded to be a breakdown of how various fields in science have progressed over centuries as mankind has advanced. The book starts off introducing the idea that the telling of natural history has changed numerous times as humans have evolved. We also learn to agree that our knowledge has been shaped by the tools available and the perceptions of its users. In the earliest stages of life, Muehlbauer

The Path to the Future: Science or Religion?

1242 words - 5 pages plague of Power, not germs.” (R.J. Rummel’s, N/A) Currently there are several institutions encouraging dialogues between science and theology, which include: The European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, the Science and Religion Forum, and the Berkeley Center for Theology and Natural Science. This institutes have placed prominent scientists, like Stephen hawking, with prominent theologist, like John Polkinghorne, and the result has

The Problem of Evil in Hume's Dialouges on Natural Religion and "Candide"

1398 words - 6 pages each address this issue in Candide and Dialogues on Natural Religion, respectively. Voltaire does so in a more lighthearted approach typical of the philosophes, employing his wit to address weighty issues of philosophy and at the same time entertaining his readers. Candide makes this point with an amusing story and its brutal satire; Hume does so in a more pedagogical style. However, the Dialogues do employ a sort of plot that helps to draw the

Homosexuality, Nature or Nurture?

1652 words - 7 pages that we are living in. Although the approach to proving whether it is a causal of the environment and condition that one grows up in or natural innate properties that make them that way, they are still trying to prove the same point.In the dialogues of "The Symposium," Socrates discusses the nature of homosexuality. Many of the great philosophers that we refer back to for knowledge were homosexuals; which proves that sexual orientation is not a

Against The Argument From Evil

1352 words - 6 pages In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Philo Presents an interesting argument, which is referred to as the argument from evil. The basic idea of the argument is that because there is so much evil and pain in this world there is no way there is an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God. The purpose of this paper is to show that the argument fails, by defending a view on which the presence of evil is completely compatible with this

Teleological Argument for the Existence of God

2740 words - 11 pages . In his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume offers many objections through the voice of the sceptic Philo, with whom he seems to sympathise. Hume's proposal is basically that the premises of the teleological argument do not entail the conclusion of the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent god with any necessity. He points out that the properties of the world do not seem to match up with the essential theistic notion of

God creator or God as creation is a very controversial topic

1174 words - 5 pages believe. And Number five the last one God exists both in reality and in the mind - provided that we accept the possibility of 'the greatest being'.David Hume a philosopher in the early 1700's wrote " Dialogues concerning Natural Religion" In this break he uses their characters to argue for and against the existence of God. Philo argued the course and effect argument, saying that you don't cut your finger with out it bleeding, and you don't build a

Notes on Enlightenment Thinkers

746 words - 3 pages and becomes the first person to use it to study the moon and planets-Religion cannot explain natural phenomena, only math canNewton1643-1727Principia Mathematica(The Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy)*The universe is desrcribed as a giant clock and all parts work together perfectly in ways that could be expressed mathematically.OpticsLaw of gravity*Every object in the universe attracts every other object*The degree of attraction


3598 words - 14 pages . He visited Sicily at least three times in all and may have been richly subsidised by Dionysius. On return from Sicily he began formal teaching at what became the Academy. Plato is generally regarded as the inventor of the philosphical argument as we know it, and many would claim that the depth and range of his thought have never been surpassed. Works Plato's fame rests on his Dialogues, which are all preserved. They are usually divided

Similar Essays

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Essay

1342 words - 5 pages an existence, therefore when explaining the essence and nature of God, there are no such beings or deities in the entire world who possess all three qualities. If this was possible, then that would have to be from a high level of intelligence that no human would be able to comprehend in any fashion of known existence, thus refuting there being and existence of a supreme being all together. Works Cited dialogues concerning natural religion

David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

1737 words - 7 pages David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion provide conflicting arguments about the nature of the universe, what humans can know about it, and how their knowledge can affect their religious beliefs. The most compelling situation relates to philosophical skepticism and religion; the empiricist character, Cleanthes, strongly defends his position that skepticism is beneficial to religious belief. Under fire from an agnostic skeptic and a

An Analysis Of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

4432 words - 18 pages An Analysis of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion ABSTRACT: Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) may be read in the way Cleanthes (and Philo as well) reads Nature, as analogous to human artifice and contrivance. The Dialogues and Nature then are both texts, with an intelligent author or Author, and analogies may be started from these five facts of Hume's text: the independence of Hume's characters; the non

Commentary Of Evil In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X

861 words - 4 pages In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X, Philo have questioned how it is possible to reconcile God's infinite benevolence, wisdom, and power with the presence of evil in the world. “His power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness. His wisdom is infinite: he is never mistaken in choosing the means to any end: but the course of