This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Dictatorship Or Democracy In Pakistan? Essay

1469 words - 6 pages

“Dictatorship or democracy?” it is a popular question, or rather a debate going all around this country especially in media talks. These two are the form of government, and both of them have ruled Pakistan separately. Most of the people in Pakistan consider democracy the best form of the regime, but few believe the other way round. They intend that way because dictatorship has been the most successful type of government until now, but the disadvantage of this type of government is that it gives one person too much power, so that he has no motivation to do what is right for the country. Even though illiterate and corrupt politicians have ruled Pakistan in democracy, nevertheless, we should ...view middle of the document...

People will themselves select their Leader and it’s the responsibility of the Leader to fulfill the needs of the people and work day and night for this Motherland.” He also achieved this country democratically and was a well-wisher of democracy.

“In a democracy the poor will have more power than the rich, because there are more of them, and will of the majority is supreme” Aristotle.

This means that the representatives of the poor and common man will come into power in a democracy, and they will be answerable to these people. Thus, the elected members will work for the welfare and betterment of the poor masses of the country. This also increases the importance of a common person and makes him the important part of the society. This is the reason that democracy is praised by many and is a form of government in more than 165 countries. “Government of the people, by the people, for the people”. This is what the great statesman, Abraham Lincoln, said about democracy. Moreover, democracy ensures equality and accountability among every single individual, whether he is a common person, a landlord, or even a prime minister. The previously elected government of PPP proved this right when their both prime ministers appeared in front of the Supreme Court. On the other hand, nowadays, a former dictator is hesitating to appear in front of the court, and he is continually making excuses to prevent himself from accountability.

The major problem with a dictatorship is that it gives one too much power that he stops thinking about the betterment of the nation and starts taking decisions, which helps him to prolong his tenure and fulfill his dreams and desires. When Gen. Zia UL Haq imposed martial law, he promised to hold new and neutral parliamentary elections within the next 90 days and to hand over power to the civilian representatives of the nation, but he never fulfilled his promise and his regime proved to be the longest in the history of Pakistan. Similarly, when Pervez Musharaf overthrew the elected government, he was ordered by the court to restore democracy in the next three years but that never happened. “Because dictators have absolute power, they often find themselves completely unable to forgo using their own power to enrich themselves and their supporters at the expense of their subjects. See: the disgustingly sybaritic buildings of the Catholic Church at a time when folks did not even have closed sewers (even the Indus Valley civilization that came thousands of years before that had that!) or the special Communist Party shops or the opulent palaces of the Tsarist government that they used as a hypocritical justification for overthrowing. What makes this especially ironic is that even though dictatorships benefit in the short term by looting their subjects and hoarding the wealth, in the long term they'd be even richer by letting a portion of that capital escape to their subjects.” This excerpt from rational wiki pretty much explains the...

Find Another Essay On Dictatorship or Democracy in Pakistan?

In a democracy we have many rights. In a dictatorship people do not have the same rights

544 words - 2 pages Democracy Verses Dictatorship.There are many groups of people in the world who stay in different countries, who have to work together. A leader will make decisions on behalf of the group. On the condition that most people obey their leader, he or she should have the support of many people in the group. Well-liked individuals within a group can influence many ordinary people to vote or support the person they want for a leader. These popular

Was autocracy in the middle ages better or worse than the democracy we live in today?

573 words - 2 pages Introduction."Australian democracy is a fairer system of government than the autocracy of medieval time" Discuss. A topic that has the ability to make people question their own government. Is it true, was it really better living with the autocracy of medieval times, or is today's government more humane to all people living in our society?In the Australian democratic system everyone gets a say.A government is put into power by receiving votes in

Has democracy been enhanced in Britain because of Tony Blair's recent political reforms or not?

1486 words - 6 pages The question at hand seeks to determine if democracy has been enhanced in Britain as a result of Tony Blair's recent political reforms or not?What is democracy? Democracy can be defined as a form of government where the population of a society controls the government. "Democracy can flourish only as a part of a rich culture of rights respected and duties performed. Most of these rights and duties relate to community life beyond the sway of the

What role (or roles) do elections play in a „managed democracy”?

646 words - 3 pages Elections in a „managed democracy“ regime help to sustain the spectre of legitimacy and thus create a better image of the state among its own citizens and other nations abroad; by changing electoral rules (and by other practices related to elections) politicians try to secure their place among the current and future political elite which gets to rule; elections also provide some kind of feedback from society which is somewhat altered by the

Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected Government

1319 words - 5 pages Yar 1Muhammad Asfand Yar2017-10-0265 Farhana Shahzad Writing and Communication (Section#10)Monday, 17th March, 2014.Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected GovernmentAbraham Lincoln defined democracy as "government of people, by the people and for the people". In developed countries the rule of dictators is always looked down upon. The dictatorship is considered to be the worst form of government since

Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected Government

1309 words - 5 pages Yar 1 Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected GovernmentAbraham Lincoln defined democracy as "government of people, by the people and for the people". In developed countries the rule of dictators is always looked down upon. The dictatorship is considered to be the worst form of government since it deprives the people off their basic rights of participating in the affairs of their country.While critically

Could Dictatorships be a Better Option for Developing Countries?

1001 words - 5 pages “Government of people, by people and for the people is called democracy”, (Aristotle) the Greek or more precisely Aristotle defined democracy this way. In these recent times though, democracy has changed in shape and form and has constantly evolved since the last 100 years or so. So it is quite difficult to find a definition of democracy in modern times, which is accepted universally. Every country delineates democracy according to its own

The Democratic System of Government is appropriate for Pakistan

904 words - 4 pages Certain countries in the world have been ruled by the military dictators as well as the democratic leaders. Pakistan is one of the finest examples of such a system. In Pakistan, military and democratic government exchange hands time and again and this chain goes on. This is evident from the past experiences. This is also evident from current economic crisis of the country after a long period of dictatorship. It seems that the democratic system

Poverty in Pakistan: Causes and Consequences

1746 words - 7 pages didn’t help improve the quality of education In the period between 1977 and 1988, military dictatorship returned to country which lasted till 1985. From 1985 to 1988 there was restricted parliamentary democracy. Again in this military regime Pakistan saw economic growth as GDP increased by 6.7 percent per annum. In this period like the previous military regime preference was given to private sector and foreign direct investments. There was a

poverty and pakistan

637 words - 3 pages development, societal norms and values. But the contents of the needs are more or less the same everywhere. Hunger, lack of shelter, being sick and unable to see a doctor, no access to school and education, joblessness, fear of the future are all the constituents of the Poverty. It also encompasses lack of opportunities, expression, representation and freedom. Pakistan is a low income developing country. In Pakistan, like other developing countries


637 words - 3 pages anyone to pick a side. Dictatorship is not always seen for its positive aspects such as stable government, efficiency, less room for corruption, and a lesser crime rate. In a dictatorship, decision-making lies with one person and others do not have any say in the working of the government which offers a kind of stability. Problems such as frequent elections, as in the case of democracy, or a disruption of peace due to political factions, do not

Similar Essays

Dictatorship Suits Pakistan Better Than Democracy

1178 words - 5 pages , democracy can be a viable form of government for most of the countries, however for a third world country like Pakistan, dictatorship seems appropriate because it has a low literacy rate which render the masses incapable of making a rational choice, prevalent provincialism which takes priority over national decision making and lastly dictatorship in Pakistan has always outperformed democracy in economic development and growth. According to a report

Dictatorship In Pakistan Essay

1435 words - 6 pages not elected by the people. In democratic country like Pakistan there is a lot of political violence which leads to the disruption of the peace. On the other hand in dictatorship one person or a small group of people have absolute power resulting in no political violence. In Pakistan people want peace and this can be achieved through dictatorship. In many countries dictatorship is successful then democracy. In Pakistan there is a failure of

Failure Of Democracy In Pakistan Essay

1952 words - 8 pages illusory goal. With its Founder's early demise in September 1948, the new State of Pakistan lost the promise of healthy political growth with acute systemic deficiencies restricting its transition to democracy. After the Quaid, it was left without any sense of direction, and came to be possessed by a corrupt political hierarchy of no more than a bunch of self-serving, feudalist and opportunistic politicians who were to manage the newly independent

Democracy To Dictatorship In Lord Of The Flies

1120 words - 4 pages Democracy to Dictatorship in Lord of the Flies        Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel that represents a microcosm of society in a tale about children stranded on an island. Of the group of young boys there are two who want to lead for the duration of their stay, Jack and Ralph.  Through the opposing characters of Jack and Ralph, Golding reveals the gradual process from democracy to dictatorship from Ralph's democratic