This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Dictatorship Suits Pakistan Better Than Democracy

1178 words - 5 pages

A famous quote by Abraham Lincoln is, ‘’ Government by the people, of the people, for the people.’’ Unfortunately in Pakistan the phrase ‘For the people’ is invalid as politicians do no work for the people but they want to gain the maximum power and want to fill their pockets with money. Pakistan was founded on 14th August, 1947. During the past 67 years, Pakistan has experienced both dictatorship and democratic governments. Even though, democracy can be a viable form of government for most of the countries, however for a third world country like Pakistan, dictatorship seems appropriate because it has a low literacy rate which render the masses incapable of making a rational choice, ...view middle of the document...

They have no knowledge of the other candidates hence they are forced to vote for the same people and rely on the same party over and over again and hence power remains with the same person. This is because the Pakistan masses are gullible due to lack of education and can be easily influenced by the emotional appeals of the leaders. For example Pakistan People’s Party’s slogan was ‘Roti, kapra aur makaan’ (Bread, clothing and shelter), but according to Imran khan Justice was more important than ‘Roti, kapra aur makaan’ ( For these reasons we cannot expect a voter to make a sophisticated decision when he can’t even read or write. Hence their incapability to differentiate between the right and the wrong make dictators strong contenders to rule Pakistan.

Provincialism is rampant in Pakistan. Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, while addressing a huge gathering in Quetta on 5th June 1948, talked about the sinister perils of provincialism. He said: “It naturally pains me to find the curse of provincialism holding sway over any section of Pakistan.Citation:
It is evident from the past elections that the government of PMLN has won maximum votes in Punjab, PPP in Sindh and MQM in Karachi which shows that the masses do not prefer the qualities of good leaders but their cultural background and ethnic belonging matters more to them. Even if these parties agree to form a coalition government, each party endeavors to develop their own area. There is always some friction between the parties when there is a talk about allocation of government funds and resources as every party wants more funds allocated to their respective areas. There has always been incertitude regarding distribution of water from River Indus between the provinces of Punjab and Sindh as Punjab feels that it should store more water than Sindh because of its larger area and greater population. However, Sindh believes that it has a right to the same amount of water as Punjab. Consequently, Punjab has always supported The Kalabagh Dam project while Sindh and NWFP on the other hand have always had strong disapprovals and serious objections which has led to the project being unnecessarily delayed. Recently, Thar Desert in Sindh is undergoing a severe famine. Yet, Sindh has rejected Punjab’s offer of help apparently because of the competitive rivalry which is another example of provincialism where the interests of their subjects have been put behind the...

Find Another Essay On Dictatorship Suits Pakistan Better than Democracy

Was autocracy in the middle ages better or worse than the democracy we live in today?

573 words - 2 pages Introduction."Australian democracy is a fairer system of government than the autocracy of medieval time" Discuss. A topic that has the ability to make people question their own government. Is it true, was it really better living with the autocracy of medieval times, or is today's government more humane to all people living in our society?In the Australian democratic system everyone gets a say.A government is put into power by receiving votes in

Dictatorship in Pakistan Essay

1435 words - 6 pages Pakistan is better of being ruled by dictatorship than that of democracy. Although in democracy people have a right to choose their representatives but when you consider a country like Pakistan about 43% of the people are illiterate so they are not qualified enough to choose their representatives. They do not understand the economical and political issues. On the other hand dictators are

Could Dictatorships be a Better Option for Developing Countries?

1001 words - 5 pages poor will have more power than the rich, because there are more of them, and the will of the majority is supreme.”(Aristotle). Poor just concede to rich will because he thinks rich can get rid of his problems, but his troubles only increase as time passes by. Illiteracy hinders democracy in developing countries. Countries like Pakistan, India, Africa and Nigeria have a little literacy rate. People are not able to choose right representatives for

The Democratic System of Government is appropriate for Pakistan

904 words - 4 pages even less desirable results than democracy. Until today, no other form of government has been invented that could regulate public affairs better than democracy". Even if democratic government is not the perfect form of government, it is best suited to the situation and the people of Pakistan which is evident from all the discussion.Works CitedPublic Sector Developmental Programme (PSDP) 2008-09 Lincoln (1809-1865) Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

Poverty in Pakistan: Causes and Consequences

1746 words - 7 pages didn’t help improve the quality of education In the period between 1977 and 1988, military dictatorship returned to country which lasted till 1985. From 1985 to 1988 there was restricted parliamentary democracy. Again in this military regime Pakistan saw economic growth as GDP increased by 6.7 percent per annum. In this period like the previous military regime preference was given to private sector and foreign direct investments. There was a

Failure Of Democracy In Pakistan

1952 words - 8 pages illusory goal. With its Founder's early demise in September 1948, the new State of Pakistan lost the promise of healthy political growth with acute systemic deficiencies restricting its transition to democracy. After the Quaid, it was left without any sense of direction, and came to be possessed by a corrupt political hierarchy of no more than a bunch of self-serving, feudalist and opportunistic politicians who were to manage the newly independent

In a democracy we have many rights. In a dictatorship people do not have the same rights

544 words - 2 pages government.Numerous countries have started off with a dictatorship and then become a democracy afterwards such as Britain who was ruled by feudal lords. Other countries have exchanged a dictatorship administrated by a royal family to a dictatorship conducted by communist's i.e. Ethiopia. Often a democracy can be a bad thing because national parties can gain power and engage war on other country for example Hitler was elected to lead the German people in

Basic values of democracy

561 words - 2 pages small group of people are picked by the people to represent the people. A democracy can mean all of these definitions I listed but it can be powerful if it is used to a good power. The United States today is considered more of a republic rather than a democracy.If our country would be turned into a dictatorship overnight out lives would be a lot different. The question is would everyone's lives be better or worse. My opinion is that it would be

How does the presence of a Confucian culture affect the operation of democracy?

1394 words - 6 pages oxymoron, although for confucian societies it is a better alternative than democracy. Confucian democracy “modernizes Confucianism with democratic values and modifies democracy with Confucian concerns”1.Equality and freedom is a universal democratic value which all people are entitled to, many theorist have argued due to democracy societies can experience economical growth 2Zhengxu Wang argues “it does not matter whether there is a Confucian Asia or


637 words - 3 pages anyone to pick a side. Dictatorship is not always seen for its positive aspects such as stable government, efficiency, less room for corruption, and a lesser crime rate. In a dictatorship, decision-making lies with one person and others do not have any say in the working of the government which offers a kind of stability. Problems such as frequent elections, as in the case of democracy, or a disruption of peace due to political factions, do not

Human Rights In Pakistan

2806 words - 11 pages discrimination versus democracy? (Inayatullah 2007 27-42)Benazir and Pakistan human rightsPakistan's economic liberalization programs during Benazir Bhutto's second term (1993-1996) encountered frequent political crises. While growth was steady during this period, external debt soared and the Karachi Stock Exchange plunged. Bhutto avoided certain quick fixes that were politically risky. She refused to impose taxes, for example, on agriculture and the

Similar Essays

Dictatorship Or Democracy In Pakistan? Essay

1469 words - 6 pages their point is right to some extent, we still must give time for democracy to flourish. People in western countries were not literate since ancient ages. Politicians there were not sincere and honest from the very first day. It takes time to get people educated, and similarly, democracy takes years to mature. A rotten democracy is better than good dictatorship as one day it will mature into a great strength of the nation. They also indicate that

Pakistan Is Better Off Being Ruled By A Dictator Than By A Democratically Elected Government

1319 words - 5 pages Yar 1Muhammad Asfand Yar2017-10-0265 Farhana Shahzad Writing and Communication (Section#10)Monday, 17th March, 2014.Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected GovernmentAbraham Lincoln defined democracy as "government of people, by the people and for the people". In developed countries the rule of dictators is always looked down upon. The dictatorship is considered to be the worst form of government since

Pakistan Is Better Off Being Ruled By A Dictator Than By A Democratically Elected Government

1309 words - 5 pages Yar 1 Pakistan is better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected GovernmentAbraham Lincoln defined democracy as "government of people, by the people and for the people". In developed countries the rule of dictators is always looked down upon. The dictatorship is considered to be the worst form of government since it deprives the people off their basic rights of participating in the affairs of their country.While critically

Pakistan Is Better Of Ruled By A Dictator Than By A Democratically Elected Government

1384 words - 6 pages 17100258 MIAN UMAR FAROOQ FURRAH AHSAN SS 100 WRITING AND COMMUNICATION 17th March, 2014 “Pakistan is better off being ruled by a dictator than by a democratically elected government” – Persuasive essay Many countries today, have democracy in the process of electing their rulers. Most of the people like freedom and hence democracy to express their rights while electing their rulers. This is the reason that dictatorship is found rarely all over