Did Mistakes By Parliament Cause The English Civil War?

871 words - 3 pages

I do not agree with the statement that mistakes by parliament caused the civil war. Instead, I believe that it was King Charles’s personality, which was the most important factor as to why the English civil war broke out, in particular his stubbornness in refusing to allow others to make important decisions. I also believe that it was power, rather than money or religion, which was also beneficiary to the start of the English civil war.
As I touched upon in the opening paragraph, King Charles’s reluctance to share his power was one of the main causes of the civil war. Rather than conferring to Parliament as to which decisions he was to make, he appointed personal advisors. Charles was not a popular king with the English people, who were infuriated by three main reasons: his control of the nations power, his control of the nations money, and even whether England was a Protestant or Catholic country. Like Charles himself; these advisors were profoundly unpopular in what at that time was Stuart England. Notable advisors of King Charles I include Thomas Wentworth, who was the Earl of Stafford, and George Villiers, who at that time was the Duke of Buckingham. Source 1 is a popular Stuart rhyme which many of Charles’s opponents sung at the beginning of his reign. The lyrics were “Who rules the country? The King. Who rules the King? The Duke. Who rules the Duke? The Devil.” In this popular 17th century rhyme, the Duke referred to is the Duke of Buckingham, who as mentioned earlier, was deeply unpopular. This poem gives modern day historians a vital perception as to how many people viewed Charles I early on in his tenure as King. Personally, I do not think that this poem is very persuasive because of the manor it is written in. It the details of it were presented in a more formal and historical way, it would make the content considerably more persuasive. Rather than criticizing Charles as a King, this source questions whether it was Charles himself solving the countries problems, or whether it was the Duke of Buckingham who was instead pulling the strings of the country on behalf of Charles, far away from the limelight. Therefore, this source refers to power, not money or religion.
Additionally, parliament was aggravated by Charles belief in the divine right of kings. The divine right of kings is a belief in which a monarch believes he/ she is chosen by God to lead their country Nowadays, the majority of monarchs do not believe in this. Source 5 is a...

Find Another Essay On Did mistakes by Parliament cause the English civil war?

Cause of the American Civil War

2325 words - 9 pages belief for the cause of the Civil War, was the idea of slavery. Thomas Jefferson believed that slavery was, “Rock upon which the old Union would split” . While there is plenty to discuss why this was the cause of the war, the differences between the North and the South go much deeper then the question of slavery. Especially, since the Northern states tried slavery but it did not benefit them as well as it benefited the South. The last use of

Origins of the English Civil War

1037 words - 4 pages The English Civil War of 1642-1651 can be considered as a feud between the King and the English Parliament. Long before the onset of the civil war, Parliament and king Charles I had distrusted each other. As a result, Parliament often refused to finance the king’s wars. Unable to gain enough support from Parliament, Charles I challenged local control of nobles and landowners, who composed of the majority of Parliament, by “levying

Why Did The Civil War Start?

566 words - 2 pages In this chapter I will try to find out why the Civil War actually started, and what the consequences of the war were. To find out this I need to know a little more about the history of the Civil War. The causes of most wars are often very complex, but in the America civil war it came down to two major issues, slavery and the protection of the Union. In the North, they were growing richer all the time as industry developed fast. The workers

How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to appeasement by Britain?

2036 words - 8 pages How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to the policy of appeasement by Britain?Until 1931 Spain, the poorest country in Europe at the time, was a monarchy however, as a result of deep divisions within society exacerbated by the military rule of Primo de Rivera imposed in 1923, the incompetent King Alfonso XIII abdicated. Following municipal elections a liberal government took power but the ensuing republic was immediately at risk from the

Slavery as the Cause of the American Civil War

2055 words - 8 pages ’ right and the concept of slaves as property. However, states’ rights was an issue from the origins of the US and creation of the Constitution. It was the growing differences in philosophies by the North and South that made the issue of states’ rights and inevitable cause of the Civil War. One particular aspect of states’ rights that led to inevitable war was the Dred Scott decision in 1857 (Roark 497-499). Dred Scott was a former slave in

The Cause Of The Civil War: Eli Whitneys Cotton Gin

1757 words - 7 pages ripe, it needed to be picked quickly. The price of slaves skyrocketed, and this new crop ensured the practice of slavery would continue. This continuation of slavery by the South led to a ripple effect that can be seen as a driving force behind the events that led up to the Civil War.      One of the most important events caused by the cotton gin was the exile of the Cherokee Indians along the Trail of Tears. As the demand

Is the english civil war a war of religion

927 words - 4 pages Is the English Civil War a war of religion?The English Civil war started in 1642. It was an infamous war that brutally ripped families apart and placed them in one group or another, depending on their political agenda they either stayed loyal to the crown and became royalists or joined the revolution and became parliamentarians. The war dragged on over four long years and is estimated that it cost 180,000 people their life. There was many

Did Yellow Journalism Cause the Spanish American War?

602 words - 2 pages W. A. Swanberg argues that writers used crude exaggeration and sensationalism in the popular New York Journal newspaper to persuade the American citizens and President William McKinley to attempt to free Cuba by starting a war against Spain. William Randolph Hearst was the owner of this particular newspaper. Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer were both big names in the United States and had the power to sway popular opinion with their wealth. Their

What Were the Causes of the English Civil War?

1055 words - 4 pages Parliament team, and they got furious. This anger was one of the many reasons the Civil War came to be.Religion was also a major benefactor in the outbreak of the civil war. Charles' wife Henrietta Maria, was a strong French Catholic believer. Charles' father James VI set up the marriage. The English public - especially the Puritans disagreed, and did not like the idea of having a Catholic as a Queen. In 1633, because of the dismissal of Parliament he

Weapons of the Civil War: Why Did The North Win?

1626 words - 7 pages Weapons of the Civil War: Why Did The North Win?      Battles have been fought since the dawn of time. Weapons have gradually become more technological and sophisticated each and every time. People learn from their mistakes, as did the Indians in the late 1700s, as well as the Confederate troops from the Civil War. The Union was victorious in this war for freedom, and to this day, the north is more the heart of the country’s economy

Did the North Win the Civil War before it Began?

1093 words - 4 pages Did the North Win the Civil War before it Began?      I agree with the idea that the North had won the Civil War before it began to the extent of Lincoln’s conservative political stands. Trying to receive the favor of the South while winning in the North would require Lincoln to take neutral stands in heated political issues like slavery. It wasn’t really wan by the North until he broke away from these stands to enact the Emancipation

Similar Essays

Why Did Cromwell Forcibly Dissolve The Rump In April 1653, Despite Having Fought To Defend Parliament In The Civil War?

643 words - 3 pages It is indeed ironic that despite having fought to defend the rights of Parliament in the Civil War of 1642-46, Cromwell forcibly dissolved the Rump in 1653, a mere 4 years after the execution of the King and establishment of the English Republic. Moreover, the reasoning behind the decision to terminate the proceedings of this Parliament, which had by now been dwindled down by various purgations to about fifty-three members, has been a matter of

The English Civil War Essay

2216 words - 9 pages though the events that occurred during the English Civil War had never occurred. While the Civil War was taking place, many issues in society went through reform. The people of England lost a lot of family members who were close to them, the Church of England was cause for a lot of rebellions as religions emerged and formed and the Monarchy was completely dissolved only to be revived again by the winners of the war- Parliament. However, once the

The English Civil War Essay

1258 words - 5 pages ended in 1649. Great leaders have taken charge before, during, and after the Civil War and finally when it had ended; England had just experienced one of its biggest impacts in its history.The English Civil War broke out caused by many different reasons. Conflicts between James I and Charles I against Parliament had lead to the Civil War. One of the reasons that brought forth the Civil War was the Divine Right of Kings that James I introduced to

The Role Played By John Pym Ensured That Parliament Was Always Likely To Win The First Civil War Of 1642

896 words - 4 pages 'The role played by John Pym ensured that Parliament was always likely to win the first Civil War of 1642-1646' How far do you agree with this judgement? (30 marks)Although John Pym died in 1643, his actions regarding the Civil War of 1642-1646 helped to ensure Parliament's victory. However it is unfair to say that he is solely to thank for this victory as Parliament's tactical placing meant that they had greater resources etc. This combined