Difference Principle Essay

599 words - 3 pages

In the context of international relations and economic development, the demands of global justice remain controversial in terms of the relationships between affluent societies and less well-off ones. Many questions have been raised in regard of what distributive justice entails, what duty of assistance it requires, how much is owed, and to whom. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls attempts to identify what principle of justice rational agents would choose if they were placed behind the “veil of ignorance”: they were deprived of all knowledge regarding their personal characteristics (sex, race, physical shape etc.) as well as social and historical circumstances (class, generation, etc.). Rawls concludes that rational agents in such positions would embrace the Difference Principle, the idea that inequalities are acceptable only insofar as they operate to benefit the least advantaged in society. This implies that inequalities can actually be justified as long as ...view middle of the document...

As a result, they would accept the Difference principle as the standard of global distributive justice for the same reason that parties agree to it in the domestic original position. Secondly, different countries interact with each other economically and politically to flourish and develop. The international interdependence generated by such interactions creates the conditions for applying difference principle globally as it shows the existence of a global corporative scheme. Beitz argues that given such global scheme, national boundaries have no moral significance and are not justified in limiting any social obligations. For Beitz, Difference principle must apply to the world as a whole so that global institutions will be arranged to benefit the globally worst-off.
However, there are reasons to restrict the application of Difference Principle only to nations. Michael Blake, in his Distributive Justice State Coercion and Autonomy, argues that although absolute deprivation is an international concern, relative deprivation is not. By “absolute deprivation”, he refers to deprivation that affects fundamental human functioning, one that prevents a person from being an autonomous agent. For example, since severe famine and extreme poverty might negatively affects a person’s autonomy, a concern for autonomy yields a global concern for ending famine and poverty. By “relative deprivation”, he refers to deprivation in comparison with someone else, such as the gap between the rich and the poor. According to Blake, concern for relative deprivation results only from direct legal coercion, because it is the domestic legal system that structures basic economic interactions and determines individual responsibilities. Without such system, it is impossible to create and enforce a coercive framework that regulates agent’s behaviours. However, these legal systems do not exist at the global level. Therefore, the Difference Principle cannot apply to global settings.

Works Cited

1. Beitz, Charles R. "Justice and international relations." Philosophy & Public Affairs (1975): 360-389.
2. Blake, Michael. "Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy." Philosophy & Public Affairs 30, no. 3 (2001): 257-296.

Find Another Essay On difference principle

Food Stamp Cuts: Justified or Unjustified?

787 words - 4 pages Recent cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Aid Program (S.N.A.P.), also known as the U.S. Food Stamp Program, have become extremely controversial. Whether Congress was wrong to reduce funding to the program remains a question. There are two principles that may be used to represent each side of this debate. The difference principle will be used to represent those who believe the program cuts were unjustified and the harm principle will be used to

Daniel Bernoulli and his Principle Essay

902 words - 4 pages why planes need to take off at high speeds is because when the plane is flying at higher speeds, it’s forcing more air beneath and above its wings, therefore creating a higher pressure difference. In conclusion, Bernoulli’s principle is an amazing concept that we have been able to use in our modern lives. Applying it to the lift of an airplane and racecars staying on the ground is just a few examples of how it works. Other applications that use

Economic Justice

679 words - 3 pages everyone's advantage and open to all.Rawl believes that the first principle, the liberty principle, should take precedence over his second, the difference principle. The liberty principle entails that each citizen should have the right to political liberty, such as the right to vote or stand for election, liberty of conscience and freedom of thought, the right to hold personal property, freedom of speech and assembly, and freedom from arbitrary

Global Poverty

761 words - 4 pages Peter Singer, in his influential essay “Famine, Affluence and Poverty”, argues that affluent people have the moral obligation to contribute to charity in order to save the poor from suffering; any spending on luxuries would be unjustified as long as it can be used to improve other’s lives. In developing his argument, Singer involves one crucial premise known as the Principle of Sacrifice—“If it is in our power to prevent something bad from

John Rawls' A Theory of Justice

705 words - 3 pages liberties) that is fair, just and equal. Rawls reasons that all inequalities that do not arise from such social circumstances are just, and therefore searches for a way to make social inequalities fair. In accordance with his policy of "justice as fairness", Rawls creates, and later defends, what is known as the "difference principle" (principle of justice #2). This principle stipulates that those who are advantaged by social and natural

The Conflict between the Welfare Principle and Article 8

1711 words - 7 pages . However, English judges have suggested that there is a little difference between the ECHR and the welfare principle. In Re KD (A Minor) (Ward: Termination of Access) Lord Templeman stated that ‘there is no inconsistency of principle or application between the English rule and the Convention rule’ because the welfare principle was evolved against the historical background of conflict between the parents over the upbringing of their children

Experience as a Coach in Interacting With the Coachee

1108 words - 4 pages or advancing to a higher level. In spite of her situation, it was necessary as a coach to encourage her that she was a valuable asset to the company, and that her skills and knowledge did not go unnoticed by her peers and management. Similar to the Construction and Positive Principle, the Poetic Principle and Anticipatory Principles, also applied to the team member’s situation. The difference in these principles is that in the

Analysing John Rawls' Theory of Justice and its principles, and the conflicts which may arise from its implementation

1651 words - 7 pages all.Rawl believes that the first principle (the liberty principle) should take precedence over his second (the difference principle). The liberty principle entails that each citizen should have the right to political liberty (ie to vote and stand for election), liberty of conscience and freedom of thought, the right to hold personal property, freedom of speech and assembly, and freedom from arbitrary arrest and seizure. Rawl wishes to see all these

Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? Preschool Children’s Use of the Verbal-Nonverbal Consistency Principle during Inconsistent Communications

1306 words - 5 pages recognize the verbal and nonverbal cues. Children have to understand the difference between reality and appearance such as the distinctions between expressed and felt emotions to begin to use the verbal-nonverbal principle appropriately. Only with these prerequisite skills can individuals begin to use the principle to make decisions about which channel to rely on during inconsistent communication. Existing research has consistently show that these

Justice as Fairness versus the Principle of Average Utility. On John Rawl's statement

2418 words - 10 pages meanings of the second principle, stemming from the ambiguous phrases 'everyone's advantage' and 'equally open'. To everyone's advantage gives rise to the principle of efficiency and the difference principle, the phrase equally open leads to careers open to talents and equality of fair opportunity. Rawls presumes that the first principle applies for all of the interpreted meanings of the second principle. Rawls defines the principle of efficiency

The polluter pays principle and its implementation in the UK and EC law

3725 words - 15 pages and that difference in the Community principles cannot be used to declare another principle void.Part IIIList of legislative documents that implement the PPP.This Common Inheritance (Cm 1200), 1990, para 1.25, p.13The 1992 Rio Declaration, Principle 16Environmental Protection Act 1990Environment Act 1995Treaty of Amsterdam 1997, Articles 174-176Declaration on Environmental Action Programme, 1973.EC Council Recommendation on the Application of

Similar Essays

Does Rawls Succeed In Showing That The Difference Principle Would Be Chosen In The Original Position?

2004 words - 8 pages In order to understand Rawls' justifications for choosing the Difference Principle in the Original Position and to establish his relative success we must first have a general understanding of what the Original Position and the Difference Principle comprise of, as well as the conditions he applies.In this section I will be providing a basic outline of the features of the Original position and the Difference Principle and the pertinent constraints

Theory Of Justice Essay

668 words - 3 pages can be compared to the natural sciences. Yet, it should be understood that political philosophies are highly circumstantial in nature. In this essay I will explore John Rawls’ theory of domestic justice with a particular focus on the difference principle. Then, I will critically discuss the possibility of applying Rawls’ theory of difference in the global context. Finally, I will outline the challenges that a global application of distributive

My Essay Gives A Description Of The Cost Principle, Revenue Recognition Principle, Matching Principle And All Of There Differences, All The Work Is Cited And Refrenced

1235 words - 5 pages revenue, and it will take a long time before all the material expenses can be matched. (Weygandt et al, Accounting Principles Second Canadian Edition, 569) Differences between the Matching Principle and the Revenue Recognition Principle: The difference between the Revenue Recognition Principle and the Matching Principle is that the Matching Principle is used to match expenses with revenues during the period of time when revenue is earned. Compared

Daniel Bernoulli And His Contributions Essay

1023 words - 5 pages Bernoulli's principle. In an airplane wing, the top of the wing is slightly curved while the bottom of the wing tends to be flat. While flying, the air travels through both sides of the wing. The air on the bottom moves slower compared to the air on the top due to the curvature of the top part of the wing. This difference in velocity creates a difference in pressure which creates the lift that allows the planes to fly. Another example of Bernoulli's