Direct Democracy Vs Representitive Democracy. Contains The Ideas Of Rousseau

942 words - 4 pages

The term Democracy is derived from two Greek words, demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning rule. These two words form the word democracy which means rule by the people. Aristotle, and other ancient Greek political philosophers, used the phrase, `the governors are to be the governed', or as we have come to know it, `rule and be ruled in turn'.The two major types of democracy are Representative Democracy and Direct Democracy. Clearly the arguments for and against each form of democracy are plentiful. However, it is my belief that theoretically, Direct Democracy is the superior form of political rule. Due to problems with in the direct democratic system, its use as a practical form of government is not even thinkable. Therefore, in order for any form of democracy to function, Representative Democracy is the superior form of political rule.Jean Jacques Rousseau is considered by many to be the `Grandfather' of direct the democracy theory. Rousseau's ideal society would be where the citizens were directly involved in the creation of the laws which are to govern their lives. He maintained that, 'all citizens should meet together and decide what is best for the community and enact the appropriate laws. Any law which was not directly created by the citizens is not valid, and if those laws are imposed on people, that is equivalent to the people being enslaved.The citizens of a society must both develop and obey `the supreme decision of the general will', which is the society's determination of the common good. It is not even thinkable that all citizens will agree on what good is. Rousseau recognized this and accepted a term of majority rule. Those who voted against a policy which is found to be the best for the general, must have been thinking of personal gains, rather than the gains of the entire society.The feature which distinguishes direct democracy from other forms of government is the idea of agreement and the key to agreement is discussion. It is impossible to reach an agreement without discussion, because it is not right to think that everybody will have the same opinion on all matters. But, it is very possible, that through discussion an agreement could be reached by all members. Representation, on the other hand allows a select few to make decisions in their own best interest, which is not necessarily the best interest of the society.However, direct democracy is not the perfect method to produce a union of the community. For a direct democracy to work, face to face communication between all members of the community is needed. The only way this is possible is to meet in large groups. Due to the fear of high tension, many citizens 'will not participate in these large group meeting. So in order for these fearful people to voice their opinions they must get together in...

Find Another Essay On Direct democracy -vs- representitive democracy. Contains the ideas of Rousseau

Critical Analysis of Mendelson's and Parkins' "Introducing Direct Democracy in Canada"

1263 words - 5 pages In the article titled Introducing Direct Democracy in Canada, Mendelsohn and Parkin attempted proving to the readers that the holding of more referendums would improve Canadian democracy, as it would involve the general public in the making of policies and decisions that directly affected their lives. They state that the Canadian executive is given an enormous amount of power when he comes into office, which does not give others-outside of his

The History of Democracy Essay

2152 words - 9 pages Democracy is a large component within governmental politics in the modern world we live in; some would argue that it is the only true form of “practiced politics” because democracy keeps in mind the interests of other individuals. The realm of democracy is where ideas are shared because not one being will ever possess the notion of an absolute truth. Democracy sanctioned for multiple ideas to be presented which diversified perspectives on a

The Art of Democracy

596 words - 3 pages Democracy was founded in the ancient Greece city-state of Athens. Athens went through a couple of systems of government before coming upon democracy. Democracy was created in order to satisfy the citizens of Athens and helped to revolutionalize politics in ancient Greece and, a couple of centuries later, the rest of the world. Because the revolutionary ideas of the Athenians had more solutions than problems, I believe that the government

The Government of Democracy

1635 words - 7 pages , Greece, someone needed to be a free, land baring man and be no younger than 20 years of age. Another way that ancient Greek democracy differed from modern democracy is because they ran their government on a direct democracy system rather than an electoral democracy, also referred to as a Republic. Ancient Rome gave birth to the idea of a Republic, which dates back to 500 B.C. and to Romulus himself. Rome’s first form of Government was a

The Politics of Democracy

929 words - 4 pages ”? Rather which system more benevolently serves the people, since “democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people”. Despite participatory democracy being the most democratic of the two systems of government, representative democracy feasibility and efficiency, makes it the most formidable for Mars. Participatory democracy, in its true form, is dismissed simply for its practicality of use. With a population of 11 million

Democracy Vs Communism

537 words - 2 pages Communism vs DemocracyCommunism is an original system of society, quite different from Democracy in many ways. While total democracy is not widely spread, many forms of it are prosperous throughout the world today.One of the first and major differences between a Communist and Democratic government is their contrary economic systems. In a communist government, the community owns the major resources and means of production. The goal of such a

Absolutism vs. Democracy.

586 words - 2 pages If a country were choosing it's government, and I was the one who was to decide if we were to follow a democracy or an absolute ruler, I would select a democracy. Democracy is the only government where the people wont have their freedoms taken by one person and no one can abuse their power. Democracy is more effective then absolutism in that power is separated in 3 branches, this way of government is firmly believed in by Montesquieu. Another

The Future of Global Democracy

3300 words - 13 pages about changes. The internet will produce a shift of power away from political elites to ordinary citizens. The internet will change the way governments rule and could give citizens a way to govern themselves in a more direct democracy (Cavanaugh, 2000). One effect of the information technology has been the digitization of many things, including not only communication but products and services. This changes the communication form one to

Communism vs Democracy

905 words - 4 pages , there is a distinct difference of social classes. People of power commending prestige and money. Others not so fortunate live off of welfare.The USA has been the status quo of places to live for a number of reasons. Everybody has his or her own reasons to appreciate the freedom that we have. We as the people have the power to change, impeach, and lobby for what we believe in. A democracy is a form of government in which substantial portion of the

Plato: The Grandfather of Democracy

1484 words - 6 pages Plato: The Grandfather of Democracy The history and the evolution of what we know as law, has developed out of many different viewpoints and philosophies. It has been the result of the operational and manipulative aspects of public affairs, and also seems to be the creation of different philosophical systems. There have been many that have been innovators in this area of thought from political leaders and dictators, to others who were

The cure for ills of Democracy is More Democracy

2850 words - 11 pages another principle of liberal democracy that is classified by its participation. Direct democracy and Representative democracy are the two main classifications. In Direct Democracy the people make their own legislations, not having to use intermediation by a representative. In representative Democracy there is intermediation and it is a representative elected by a majority in a determined area. In deed representative democracy is predominant in

Similar Essays

The Ambivalence Of Direct Democracy Essay

1044 words - 4 pages The California Constitution states, “All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require.” (CA Const. art. 2, sect. 1) Indeed, the age-old maxim that the government is for the people is evident in California’s Constitution, and the inception of direct democracy by the early 20th century Progressive

Republicanism And Direct Democracy Essay

1245 words - 5 pages Republicanism and direct democracy, these are two ways that a people can be governed. There is a major difference between these two systems. In a republican system the government represents the people. The representatives are chosen by popular vote and are given the power to make decisions on behalf of the people. The people do not get to voice their own opinions, the best they can do is vote for their representative and hope he wins. This

Federalist No.10’s Faction And Direct Vs. In Direct Democracy

857 words - 3 pages . Madison explains that the only way to deal with causes of faction is by controlling its effects. This is where the constitution comes into play, providing security of the public good and the rights of other citizens. To assure constitution, democracy is enacted to form a more civilized community governed by the people. The way democracy is organized is determined by the ideas of being direct or indirect. Direct Democracy is defined by people as

John Locke And Jean Jacques Rousseau On Equality And Democracy

1567 words - 6 pages Fighting for democracy in an age of monarchies in Europe, John Locke was a revolutionary thinker whose belief in human reason and self-rule inspired many intellectuals centuries after his death. Advocating the "general will," or actions and decisions for the good of the community rather than one's self, the insight of Jean-Jacques Rousseau is found in almost every hint of modern philosophy. Though in common they share theories on the state of