Disagreement In Natural And Human Sciences

1473 words - 6 pages

In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?I think that disagreement is the key to a deeper understanding in all endeavours. If we only surround ourselves with those who agree with us then we will never stretch our minds nor test our limitations. There are dissimilarities between disagreement and hostility as they don't necessarily connect with each other because hostility deals with emotions and it is the act of warfare due to the hatred towards something.That's why I make sure not to surround myself with people who almost always support me in my decisions or believe my claims because I need to be tested and have others point out to me where I might have been going wrong and what I should do to fix the problem. After an argument due to disagreement takes place, I tend to discover many new facts on my way to prove my point. I don't always handle the disagreement or criticism well but as you might expect when I step back and breathe and realize that the other person has the best of intentions then I take their advice to the heart. Therefore disagreement sometimes leads to new discoveries.Once, I had a disagreement with my cousin about 'which one came first into this world, the plant or the seed?' We argued about it for days because I claimed that the seed came first whereas my cousin claimed that the plant came first. After about a month, my cousin came up to me and reasoned it out with me that it is the plants that came first into this world. It started off from single-celled organisms and it went on evolving to multi-celled organisms. In the pursuit of knowing about which one came first, I realized that we came to understand the evolution theory better than before and a lot of details about plants and its functions. Basically, disagreement leads a person to understand more about the topic and explore various aspects of it.Disagreement is a fundamental element in the natural sciences, without it there would be no form of development. In the natural sciences there are a set of specified criteria that must be filled before something can be taken into consideration. There must be a scientific method of: observation, creating a hypothesis, conducting experiments and then from there a law is created which then accumulates into a theory. It should be measurable, repeatable and controllable to be considered a natural science. However, the theory should be re-checked and tried to be proved wrong if in case there are any errors or exceptions. In other words, it is encouraged to falsify a theory. Falsification is the idea that after a theory is created, a scientist must try their very best to prove the theory wrong, and it is through that process that the theory becomes stronger, as more and more possibilities are taken away, the theory becomes more reliable. As Ken Miller said in the Intelligent Design video, scientists do not believe their theories are absolutely true but it is the best natural...

Find Another Essay On Disagreement in Natural and Human sciences

TOK Essay: What is it About Theories in the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1507 words - 6 pages theories in Human Sciences and Natural Sciences that make them Convincing? To begin this research, there are definitions of some key terms in the title that I will explain. The principal that introduces something to be a theory in sciences is that it must be an idea/claim that is descriptive, predictable and explanatory in nature. This is built around ideas that are supported by evidence, which corresponds to logic with the current knowledge

Compare and Contrast the natural and social sciences in their philosophy and approach to research

1072 words - 5 pages , ideas and meanings constructed by the human being in a social contextual, reality. (Alan Bryman , 2008). The debate of the applicability of the natural sciences, philosophy and approach, to research by the social sciences has its roots in a traditional dispute by the positivist school of thought in contrast to the interpretivist one, that emerged as an alternative and as an opposing standing by various social researchers. It is pertinent to

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1744 words - 7 pages seek to elucidate the rules that govern the natural world through scientific methods. Ethics has caused a lot of constrains in the field of natural sciences. Many medical research institutions make use of animals for testing. Animals may be subject to experimentation useful for gaining knowledge about human diseases or for testing potential human treatments. About 20 million animals are experimented on and killed annually, three-fourths for medical

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both arts and the natural sciences. Discuss.

1560 words - 6 pages even more. On the other hand the natural sciences is almost entirely about gaining new knowledge and improving what is already known. In this age, developments in natural sciences are nearly only about human advancement. Whether is medically or discovering new things.I am going to mainly focus on how various countries, such as Argentina, the United States, Russia, Iran and France, tested their space equipment. From the mid 1940s all the way to

Ethical Judgements Limit the Methods Available in the Production of Knowledge in Both the Arts and the Natural Sciences. Discuss.

1850 words - 7 pages We make decisions all the time whether it would be in the arts or in the natural sciences. Natural science is an area of knowledge that seeks for patterns. Meanwhile the arts is a discipline in which we express both ethical and unethical ideas that are more subjective. Both areas of knowledge are affected by the ethical judgements that people make in the production and of knowledge. Ethical judgements are related to human moral values and they

Race and Ethnicity in Social Sciences

877 words - 4 pages Use of the Terms "Race" and "Ethnicity" in the Social Sciences Defining identity can be complex and therefore we have to investigate the factors involved that make us who we are and how we are seen by others, collectively or individually. Social scientists have to consider the key elements which shape identity, the importance of social structures and agency involved. The differences and/or similarities between us are the focus that categorise

This paper is about the debates between the natural sciences and the social sciences. It covers the theories of naturalism and antinaturalism.

1584 words - 6 pages reliable methods of the natural sciences in order to create a sense of relevance for social sciences. The natural sciences have for many years applied different methods in order to explain different events in the world. It is not a surprise that the social sciences would look to the natural sciences as a mentor in pursuing the study of human phenomenon. Naturalists are looking to be able to make generalizable theories and "systematize" human

Intrinsic Value in the Non-Human Natural World

1238 words - 5 pages Intrinsic Value in the Non-Human Natural World When it comes to the question of non-human rights and the value of nature, there are adamant advocates, those who completely disagree with particular values and rights for the ecosystem, and those could care less. For myself, I believe I have fallen somewhat in between these extremes and have honestly never really considered the idea of intrinsic value and certain rights

Managing Conflict and Disagreement in the Workplace Smith. (2002). Managing workplace conflict. (Issues @ Work) Westchester County Business Journal

2116 words - 8 pages Wherever there are people there will inevitably be conflict. As individuals, Smith points out, "We have our own ideas and goals, and it is only natural that in pursuing our own agendas we will sometimes be at odds with others with differing objectives and viewpoints" (Smith, 2002, p. 4). What is conflict? "Conflict is a natural disagreement resulting from individuals or groups that differ in attitudes, beliefs, values or needs

Natural Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing in Pennsylvania

899 words - 4 pages Conventional wisdom tells there are two sides to every story. Sometimes, one side represents the science, facts, and figures. Sometimes, the other side represents emotions and plays on unfounded facts. As natural gas is extracted thru hydraulic fracturing, also known as “fracking,” some people see this effort as a direct attack on mother earth; meanwhile, others see this as a blessing that has been bestowed upon us at a critical point in

Supernatural and Natural Imagery in Jane Eyre

2111 words - 8 pages the characters. In particular natural imageries have been used to convey a human connection with the natural world and human nature (Franklin, 1995). Eyre portrays the intrinsic struggle between supernatural and the effects of nature. Branflinger and Thesing (2002) argue that Bronte used Gothic and the supernatural to explore and portray the darkest alleys of her own psyche which Bronte was deeply disturbed by (p309). Matters regarding the

Similar Essays

What Is It About Theories In Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Make Them Convincing?

1253 words - 5 pages When looking at the human sciences and natural sciences, one may question the validity of a claim or choose to support it without any evidentiary support. For many years, science has been accepted by many as the dominant cognitive paradigm, or model of knowledge. In fact, there are also people who believe that science is the only pathway for gaining knowledge, and if something isn’t provable through science, then it should not be accepted. A

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1264 words - 5 pages Theories in both natural and human sciences have been very controversial throughout history such as evolution. Although some stand as correct and some have been proven wrong, most of them tend to have enough evidence to be considered correct. Most of these theories have endured a process for them to be rectified and considered as correct. The process depends on long observations, large amount of empirical prove and the interpretation of this

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1483 words - 6 pages , chemistry, and biology, depend on physical proof through experiments with several trials. The human sciences, which include subject areas such as sociology, economics, anthropology, and psychology, are based on human interaction, logic, and the collection of data. Information about both areas of knowledge can be gained through sense perception, reason, and emotion. An idea in the natural sciences must be pragmatic in order to confirm its

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1039 words - 4 pages specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others. So basically, just like the distinctions between truth and false; what may be convincing for me, may not necessarily be convincing for others. When taking in consideration the knowledge issue that theories in the human sciences and natural sciences have something that makes them