This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Discuss: "Bombing Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was An Immoral Act, A War Crime Against Humanity."

673 words - 3 pages

In August of 1945 nuclear weapons were released upon the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Soon after Japan surrended, consequently ending WWII. But was dropping the bomb justified, or an immoral act?After the attack of Pearl Harbour in December of 1941 American military started work on the Manhattan project in secret. During the time of the development of the bomb president Roosevelt died, President Truman succeeded him and continued work on the atomic bomb.Even after facing massive conventional bombings and the capturing of surrounding islands the Japanese still refused to surrender. America issued Japan with the Potsdam proclamation, which demanded the unconditional surrender of Japan. This was rejected, as the Japanese were not prepared to give up their Emperor, as they believed him to be a god. Perhaps this led to the belief that the Japanese would not surrender unless dramatic action was taken. An invasion was most likely out of the question because the cost of lives, both American and Japanese, would be too high.At the beginning of WWII the bombing of civilians was considered a barbaric act. However as the war progressed both sides abandoned previous restraints, although international law had always distinguished between civilians and combatants.Prisoners of war captured by the Japanese were starved, tortured and killed. The Japanese felt that to surrender was to show weakness and that is why they chose to fight to the death. Perhaps it is for these reasons American militants felt that if the war continued the way it was up to a million lives would be lost (both American and Japanese.) With this in mind dropping the atomic bomb may have saved many lives.As the war in Europe was drawing to an end, the allies focused their efforts on defeating Japan. The USSR proposed that in three months they would join the fight against Japan. During a convention in Russia the atomic bomb was successfully tested. When the Manhattan Project's scientific director, Dr. Oppenheimer, saw the blast, he recalled a passage from...

Find Another Essay On Discuss: "bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an immoral act, a war crime against humanity."

Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Was it Justified?

823 words - 3 pages The United States dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan on August 1945. They claimed that it was to end World War II without risking the death of hundreds of thousands American lives during a planned invasion of the Japanese mainland. The President at the time, Harry Truman had other reasons in mind when dropping the bombs like, to justify the tremendous cost of testing and researching the bombs, to intimidate and impress

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

2090 words - 9 pages ended the war in Europe. However, the U.S was still in war with Japan. Under the presidency of Truman, the U.S was winning against Japan. U.S air force had shot a series of firebombs to Japan’s capital, Tokyo. The time was right for a final attack. Preparatory to the bomb dropping on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, many scientist who had put their intelligence to the Manhattan Project had expressed their concern about the bomb. They could not believe

Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Necessary to save American lives

1900 words - 8 pages and used in warfare. Some may say that this destruction was not needed to end the war, but what they do not know is how close we were to actually losing, and after losing the war, the Germans would do what ever they wanted with America and America's citizens. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to protect our citizens' rights, freedoms, and lives.Over the time that America had been a powerful nation, no other country has brought us

NAFTA - A Crime Against Humanity

887 words - 4 pages NAFTA - A Crime Against Humanity      Generally, when most think of a crime against humanity, the most common synonym is genocide. Kosovo, Cambodia, Sudan, and Poland are all instances when genocide occurred and the public rightly labeled these instances as crimes against humanity. Within our modern world there are means other than the preconceived notion of genocide to systematically remove a specific group from their rights as humans. Using

Was the atomic bombing on Nagasaki necessary?

1396 words - 6 pages Japanese didn't want to have a war against the U.S in the first place and as discussed above, if the first bomb dropped on Hiroshima was necessary to make Japan surrender, it was definitely unnecessary for the seconding bombing of Nagasaki. In my opinion, dropping the atomic bombs on two cities full of civilians is an act of genocide. The dropping of the two a-bombs was not only unnecessary, but it puts the US government in the same category as

The Holocaust: A Crime Against Humanity

974 words - 4 pages Holocaust or Shoah. In Greek, the Holocaust means, “completely burned,” in Hebrew, it is Shoah, which means “extermination.” These exterminations have left a toll on society and the Jewish culture as well as Judaism. These executions in these concentration camps led to one of the greatest crimes ever committed against humanity. It led to the Holocaust. Works Cited Studies, The Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide . "The Holocaust

The United States was Justified in Dropping the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

970 words - 4 pages The United States was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki for many reasons. First of all, just to start out, the bombings had nothing to do with Japan, it was about the Cold War and the real reason America used these weapons was to show Russia that the US possessed them. Second, the war in the Pacific had been raging for almost four years. The two battles immediately preceding the bomb decision were Iwo Jima and

Was the Second Bombing on Nagasaki Necessary? List three reasons why or why not. I Said it wasn't and then listed three reasons

844 words - 3 pages recognized as the most powerful nation, and winning the atomic race was a big step in that direction. In Hiroshima it killed 100,000 people, most non-military civilians. Three days later in Nagasaki it killed roughly 50,000. These bombs were dropped as the Pacific battles of World War II were coming to an end. Soon after, Japan surrendered, ending the war. But, was the use of the second atomic bomb necessary? Was it too harsh and cruel to the

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Justified End to an Endless War

1090 words - 5 pages Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Justified End to an Endless War On December 7th, 1941 the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Empire of Japan. This unprovoked assault on our nation’s soil forced Congress to take action with a formal declaration of war on Japan. With the country’s entry into World War II, a secret venture was implemented by the government. The clandestine project would employ some of the greatest scientific minds in

Was an act of genocide committed against the Armenia people during 1915-1916?

1039 words - 5 pages committed massacres. The Turkish government also claims that Armenians were ‘removed’, ‘relocated’ and ‘immigrated’, rather than ‘deported’, from the eastern ‘war zone’. This calls into question the distinction between the literal meanings of these specific terminologies Deportation, as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is “the removal from a country of an alien whose presence is unlawful or prejudicial”, and Turkey claims that all

What was the reason the U.S Dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima And Nagasaki? Find out some of the reasons why this happen and how it got started. DBQ

563 words - 2 pages Why Did the U.S Dropped the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?On August 6 and 9, 1945 the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the first atomic bombs used in warfare. The United States decision to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima was strictly military measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era rather than a strictly diplomatic measure designed to force Japan's unconditional surrender. The

Similar Essays

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

1903 words - 8 pages Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki In August of 1945, both of the only two nuclear bombs ever used in warfare were dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These two bombs shaped much of the world today. In 1941, The United States began an atomic bomb program called the “Manhattan Project.” The main objective of the “Manhattan Project” was to research and build an atomic bomb before Germany could create and use one against

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

628 words - 3 pages decision. It is very unclear for the exact reasons behind using the bomb, even by reading his personal diary and researching articles. It was likely a combination of many reasons, obvious and unobvious ones. However, it is clear that his choice did save lives. Many Japanese lost their lives in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but an invasion of Japan would possibly have taken millions of Japanese and American lives.Work CitedQuote- "Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S Truman, 1945", pg. 212

Was Bombing Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary To End World War 2?

1892 words - 8 pages Plan of Investigation During the time period when Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office, it was during WWII. Japan attacked the U.S. on Dec. 7, 1941 and was known as Pearl Harbor. When that happened, Roosevelt did not hesitate to ask Congress to officially declare war on Japan. During the war, there was a proposal of an atomic bomb landing over Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finalize the war. To this day there is still controversy that if that atomic

Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

1153 words - 5 pages REFLECTION--Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?by Tanya AshreenaI agree to Stephen E. Ambrose's "Americas at War." I think that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Although, I am against using nuclear weapons to win a war, and detest the fact that so many innocent lives got killed, and those that didn't got cancer, not mentioning the bombing led to a great deal of radiation into the air, I still agree with