This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Discuss Whether Trial By Jury Should Be Abolished In The English Legal System? Critically Analyse The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The System.

2010 words - 8 pages

Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. The anti jury lobby deems the jury system unpopular the importance of which is considered only overrated. I will be critically analysing whether trial by jury should be abolished in the UK legal system plus evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the system.Lord Devlin was quoted as saying the jury system is "the lamp that shows that freedom lives". A Jury can decide cases on their idea of fairness, e.g. R v Ponting [1984] civil servant leaked info to a MP on the ground of public interest, jury refused to convict despite no legal defence. Juries are seen as the essence of citizenship, the involvement of ordinary people in government, and in this sense essential to Tony Blair's 'vision'. The jury provides people with experience of the justice system, an educative process inspiring people with confidence that the justice system is working properly. However, this theory is not backed-up by the fact that nearly everyone who is called to do jury service does their level- best to get out of it. Part of the reason is the inadequate recompense, the long waits, abrupt adjournments and inconvenient rescheduling.Jurors are interviewed to avoid bigots, one cannot always identify a bigot nevertheless there is still less of a risk with 12 jurors than with a single judge that the guilt-determiners' views will influence the verdict. It is said that it is justifiable to have a disparity in the use of criminal and civil juries because in criminal cases, the result will decide someone's future liberty and reputation, but in civil cases only money is at stake. However, this assumes that juries are somehow 'better' that they are more likely to reach 'fair' or 'correct' decisions than properly trained judges. Evidence shows that this is not the case, and therefore, the role of the jury must be purely representative, a symbol that the law is not just locking people.The judge's direction to a jury can have undue influence, they can effectively be deciding the case (and they do, in the case of directed acquittals), and this can negate the advantages of having a jury system. Juries may be incapable or unwilling to understand proceedings. Runciman Commission (1992): just under 10% of jurors admitted difficulty with a caseThe middle class are more likely to have or to be able to devise what is seen as a good excuse for not missing their work, and this results in juries of the unemployed and the working class. Many people find jury service very tedious, and do not pay appropriate attention to their duties; this cannot be advantageous since they may not come to the proper decision. Is it sought-after that people who do not want to be doing...

Find Another Essay On Discuss whether trial by jury should be abolished in the English legal system? Critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the system.

The English Legal System Essay

2075 words - 9 pages The English legal system is complex and there are many ways in which it can be influenced, this essay will explore some of the different, more obvious ways the law can be changed and what this shows in relation to the quote above. First the essay will discuss the different ways the law can be created and changed and who enables and controls those changes, with my primary examples being the common law and legislation for the judicracy and

The Jury System and Democracy Essay

1115 words - 5 pages , which is very effective for a verdict. At the jury trial it is difficult for judge to do any corrupt, so the case does not go the wrong way. Any prejudice of one juror, which is wrong will be canceled out by the others and it is fair enough. The jury system is a very important institution in the United Kingdom and a fundamental part in the English legal system. It is the best example of participatory democracy. It is the only time, that ordinary

Juries in the English Legal System

1142 words - 5 pages are lay persons they are non-qualified in law. The jury system dates back to after the Norman Conquest in Britain and throughout centuries it has developed to become a fundamental part of the English legal system. The Magna-Charta recognised the persons rights to trial by the "Lawful judgement of his peers" this became a usual method of trying criminal cases the notable case of "Bushel 1670" established independent of the

The English Legal System is based on the age-old system of precedent, which can be strict and inflexible

1415 words - 6 pages , which are below it.In order to complete this essay successfully, the relevant advantages and disadvantages of the law of precedent need to be distinguished to find out whether this law is strict and inflexible as the title suggests. As with any law or theory, individual persons will have their own ideas and attitudes towards it.The doctrine of precedent states that a decision made by a court in one case is binding in other courts, in later cases

The History of the Jury System

678 words - 3 pages facts in a jury trial, the accuracy of the testimony, the guilt or innocence of criminal defendants, and liabilities in a civil litigation. Today, many countries such as Britain, United States, Brazil, Canada, Japan, Australia, France, German, India, and so on practice jury trials. These countries will be the issue of discussion in this paper. In almost all the countries where jury system is practices, juries have been seen as the best tool for

Criminal and Civil Law in the English Legal System

1893 words - 8 pages and, despite ideology and triviality, they deal with serious cases. Magistrates also determine, subject to appeal, whether the defendant should be kept in custody pending trial. Magistrates can impose conditions to meet their concerns about granting bail. Courts have limited information on which to base bail decisions, with the exception of experimental bail information schemes involving the probation service. Normally

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sales force automation

1568 words - 6 pages Cotteleer 2008). Finally the sales people accepted the software only after the company has figured out how to put the automation system into its culture. (Mark Cotteleer 2008).RecommendationsBesides the advantages and disadvantages of sales force automation, the use of this software will be beneficial to both the company and the sales representatives. The software is only a help that will facilitate the job of the sales people and will make the company

The Value Of A Jury System

1651 words - 7 pages society and that they take a share in its government. By making men pay more attention to things other than their own affairs, they combat that individual selfishness which is like rust in society . [The jury] should be regarded as a free school which is always open and in which each juror learns his rights and is given practical lessons in the law. I think that the main reason for the political good sense of the Americans is their long experience with

Critically discuss whether prerogative powers exercised by ministers should be codified in statute. - Constitutional and Administrative Law - Essay

2151 words - 9 pages Critically discuss whether prerogative powers exercised by ministers should be codified in statute. The British constitution is unique in that it is uncodified, it has evolved over time to become what it is today. This organic growth and flexibility has enabled prerogative powers and conventions to be in use without being codified. Dicey defines prerogative powers as: “The residue of discretionary or arbitrary authority, which at any given time

Critically evaluate and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Customer Boycotts. Compare and contrast two consumer boycotts and discuss appropriate microeconomic theoretical models

2588 words - 10 pages Microeconomics Coursework EssayCritically evaluate and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Customer Boycotts. Compare and contrast either Coca Cola or Bacardi with another consumer boycott of your choice and discuss appropriate microeconomic theoretical models.Firstly to understand this question we need to understand what a customer or consumer boycott actually is. Well it is normally called by an organisation or a group of individuals

Discuss The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Mixture Of Cultures In Today's World

541 words - 3 pages accommodating immigrants. This system features the cultures of the immigrants mixing and amalgamating with the country's own without the involvement of authorities. The Melting Pot process was notably used in the US where groups of immigrants incorporated into American society at their own rate improving their income and social rank in the way. Oftentimes, this system ends up isolating minorities and creates a gap among the different ethnic groups and may

Similar Essays

Jury System Essay: Whether Or Not Jury Systems Should Be Used In Australia Legal Studies Essay

1019 words - 5 pages inconvenient, unrepresentative and an expensive system that should be abolished. The fundamentals of the jury system will be researched, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of having a jury to determine whether this statement is correct. As Section 80 of the Australian Constitution states, The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the

The Jury Selection Procedure In The English Legal System

1718 words - 7 pages The Jury Selection Procedure in the English Legal System The theory behind modern day trial by jury can be traced back some eight hundred years, to the sixty-three clauses of the Magna Carta (1215). One of these clauses reads; “ No free man shall be arrested, or imprisoned, or deprived of his property, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way

Advantages Of Jury Trials In The Canadian Justice System

2082 words - 8 pages . Hladiy). As a result of these processes, the juries in trials are always compensated, for their lack of prior knowledge on law.A trial by juries' myriad of advantages proves how valuable this system is. The justice system has implemented effective procedures and protocols that ensure that juries are not biased, and at the same time, prevent the defense and crown from taking advantage of the system and tailoring the jury to suit their needs

The English Legal System Essay

1443 words - 6 pages at the moment as to whether the two branches of the profession should be mixed in together to make just one branch. Most other countries operate with a single legal profession were individual lawyers may specialise, but all have the same qualifications and training and all are entitled to the same professional rights. The current debate is whether there is anything for the legal profession to gain by keeping the distinction