Distinguishing Science And Pseudoscience Essay

2214 words - 9 pages

To be able to demarcate science from non-science is immensely important, for our society, and its individuals. Science is our main source of knowledge and as such has many applications in our daily lives, and we need to be able to distinguish scientific findings and information from the many ideas and unbacked theories which are presented to large parts of the population, appearing as if they are fact. This may include something as fickle as weight loss plans that use diction not easily understood by the public to make the product appear authorized, certified and scientifically sound, when really the product is not scientifically tested, or trials not done in a credible manner. Another, possibly more serious scenario is in education, particularly science, many supporters of creationism and other pseudo sciences incorporate these teachings in schools, teaching them as if they were approved scientific theories to impressionable children, some who grow up retaining those beliefs, they were wrongfully taught, as fact.
Also, being able to demarcate between science and non science and pseudo science is part of being scientifically literate, to not only be able to read and understand scientific findings and journals but to be able to critically distinguish between valid, trustworthy findings and theories or ideas presented in a scientific format without actually adhering to the scientific method and other requirements for scientific research.
Demarcation between science and non-science or pseudo science is particularly important in scientific education, as it determines, for almost every member of our society, what they will accept as true regarding science, particularly creationism and evolution. Having public school with regimented teaching standards ensures that our population is taught to the same standards with the same material, of course individual teachers are not objective, but the system is supposed to be. Within the public school system evolution is the main origins theory, however it is not illegal to teach creationism, which theory of origin is thought is determined by teachers, schools, counties and states, some states require public schools to teach evolution, some teach the critique of evolution, some teach both creationism and evolution alongside one another. Even if evolution is the required theory to teach, individual teachers can, perhaps not legally, but can portray the theory in anyway, and if the students pass the standard test, the teacher has officially done his/her job. The test does not determine what they will lead their life believing.
This is an issue because creationist want to teach it as a science, creationism as a religious belief that many people still believe to be scientifically true. A common argument in favor of creationism is that the theory of evolution has gaps of activity and then periods of quick growth which proves that there is the "Hand of God" creating, but this does not make...

Find Another Essay On Distinguishing Science and Pseudoscience

Detective or Fictional? Essay

812 words - 4 pages The Scientific American™ defines pseudoscience as “a practice or belief that is known as scientific, but otherwise does not follow an acceptable scientific method, lacks subsidiary evidence or credibility, cannot be consistently tested, or lacks scientific standing.” When studying science, a key to finding “good” science is to make sure it is logical, based on facts and data, not opinions. Pseudoscience tends to appear more in the movie

Grayscale Essay

867 words - 3 pages alone make this article completely inefficient and difficult to read. It should not be difficult to finish a short article, and the entire reading was disorganized and boring. The only way to understand the article was to read it over and over so as to weed through all the terrible writing. It is obvious that it was written by numerous science board members. It was an all around displeasure to read.Work CitedThe Science Board. "Science Indicators 2000: Belief in the Paranormal or Pseudoscience". Legends, Lie, and Lore: A Skeptic's Stance. Ed. Joseph Calabrese. New York, New York. Pearson. 2007. P 55-63. Print.

Science or Pseudoscience

1522 words - 6 pages Often, therapies that are pseudoscience will appear to be scientifically based when in fact they are not. In their article, “Science and Pseudoscience in Communication Disorder: Criteria and Applications,” Fin, Bothe and Bramlett (2005) assert there are 10 criteria that can assist in determining if a therapy is scientifically based or if it is pseudoscience (p. 172). Their first criterion deals with the testability of the therapy or


2077 words - 9 pages Pseudoscience occurs when a topic that in itself is not scientific is treated as a science. Despite society’s general disregard for the demarcation point between science and non-science there are real, everyday consequences to accepting these fields into our scientific domain. So why are certain theories classified as scientific? On one hand there is an ignorance and apathy in regard to this demarcation, on the other hand pseudo-sciences are


643 words - 3 pages . Pseudoscience versus Real Science Argument The purpose of the article was to highlight the human and environmental harms associated with UNICOR e-waste recycling programs and to call for restorative environmental justice. Wikipedia defines restorative justice as “a model of justice that directly targets retributive criminal (in) justice systems” (“Restorative Justice”, n.d.). The article seeks to shed light in the way UNICOR dissemble and

Creationism is not Science

683 words - 3 pages Science by definition is the gathering of knowledge about the natural world through the use of observation, critical thinking, and experimentation. Pseudoscience is basically a belief or theory that acts as science but is not supported by the scientific method. It is used as a way to support non-evidence based beliefs which do not stand alone as truth. There are many examples of pseudoscience in our world today, but I intend to focus on the

Dogmatism vs Criticality

1694 words - 7 pages . Popper talks about falsifiability being the criterion of demarcation between science and pseudoscience, but Lakatos argues that even if an idea is falsified, the theory may persist for a while. He brings up seventeenth century literature on witchcraft that contains reports of careful observations and sworn evidence, even from experiments. Scientists dogmatically assert that experimentation and observation is the best way to attain true knowledge, but

The Debate Over Historical Information and Scientific Information

1373 words - 5 pages other hand, the use of mathematics in natural science cannot be proven wrong, but pseudoscience can be proven wrong. Pseudoscience is a science based upon theories that cannot be tested. Radionics is a pseudoscience because it contradicts the principles of physics as well as biology. This shows that natural science can also be proven wrong. The reliability of historical and scientific information is an important aspect of knowing. It is

Sci Reasoning

1023 words - 5 pages concern for causal explanation differs sciences from the crafts. As Trefil and Hazen state on page four of their textbook, science asks and answers questions on the physical universe. Karl Popper’s falsificationism characterizes science as exposing falsehoods and revealing its own mistakes. Therefore, if a hypothesis is not falsifiable, it is considered pseudoscience, as it lacks valid evidence. Methodological naturalism, with the view that science

Skepticism, Facts and Evidence. Your Keys to Not Getting Scammed

860 words - 4 pages 1. Video “Here Be Dragons” by Brian Dunning (4/15/14) is a fresh and critical overlook on the huge variety of so called “dragons” which exist in abundance even in our civilized society. This video promotes critical thinking and demonstrates the “red flags” that one has to look out for in order to detect pseudosciences. A pseudoscience is an idea that claims to be real but is not backed by any real science or evidence. For instance, hair analysis

The Search for Enlightenment

1869 words - 7 pages philosophers and scientists but rather that they speak to a deaf audience or in a language that the audience can't understand. It has become a trend in our society to dismiss science as too complicated to understand and hence to forfeit it to pseudoscience. It is here that a great irony lies for today science is by far more advanced than the archaic science of the "Enlightenment." Science, during the 20th century has put men on the moon, uncovered the

Similar Essays

What Is The Classification Of Psychology?

2428 words - 10 pages , 1(1), 3-14. doi:10.1191/1478088704qp002oa Kagee, A. A. (2011). Training psychology students to think critically: Revisiting psychology as science. Africa Education Review, 8(1), 102-114. doi:10.1080/18146627.2011.586147 Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & David, M. (2012). Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience in School Psychology: Science and Scientific Thinking as Safeguards against Human Error. Journal Of School Psychology, 50(1), 7-36

Big Five Personality Reflection Essay

550 words - 3 pages PSEUDOSCIENCE ASSIGNMENT (2 Parts to Complete) Part 1 - Pseudoscience in Advertising (20 points) One of the goals of this course is to help you recognize the difference between scientific evidence and pseudoscience. Knowledge gained with the scientific method relies on carefully controlled studies that produce results that can be replicated. Remember that your book states that the scientific approach must have the following characteristics

Science Or Pseudoscience Essay

713 words - 3 pages Often, therapies that are pseudoscience will appear to be scientifically based when in fact they are not. In their article, “Science and Pseudoscience in Communication Disorder: Criteria and Applications,” Fin, Bothe and Bramlett (2005) assert there are 10 criteria that can assist in determining if a therapy is scientifically based or if it is pseudoscience (p. 172). Their first criterion deals with the testability of the therapy or treatment

My Journal Entry: Scientific Thinking Essay

758 words - 4 pages the truth. After all science develops, hypotheses and theories that can be tested and falsifiable. Gary R Kirby and Jeffery R Goodpaster who wrote Thinking, briefly discuss astrology in Chapter 10 called “Scientific Thinking”. Kirby and Goodpaster suggest that astrology is a pseudoscience type of science. Pseudoscience a belief or claim such as astrology that is not valid and cannot adhere to a scientific method. Presented as being scientific