Divine Command Theory. Are People's Moral Standards Right Because God Commands Them, Or Does God Command Them Because They Are Right?

1624 words - 6 pages

There are millions of people who believe in God, but among these people the differences lie in to what extent each believes that God has control over what is right and wrong. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right? The Divine Command Theory most simply states that God's commands are what is morally right, and what God forbids is morally wrong. This means that loving one another is right because God commands humans to do so. Advocates of the Divine Command Theory believe this, and believe that morality is the same as that which God commands. Things are good because God created them and/or willed them.Divine Command Theorists believe that there are objective moral standard that are the same for everyone and are independent of individual beliefs. These moral standards are true for everyone regardless of whether or not they believe them or know of them. These ultimate moral standards exist in commands given by God. God commands only things that are good, and he would never command a person to act immorally. God is all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving. God commands these things in order to do what is good for us as humans, and his commands are automatically morally right.The opponents of the Divine Command Theory do not believe that God has that much control over the earth and what is morally just and unjust. They believe that morality is subjective, and that even if there is a God morality would still be subjective. What does it matter anyway what God commands or thinks since it is just another subjective opinion? One of the only reasons that people obey God's commands is that they fear that they will be punished in someway if they do not. They fear that they will go to hell if they do not obey, or that something bad will happen to them. This would mean that their motives are merely self-interested. But, a Divine Command Theory advocate would argue that God created us, and it is our obligation as his creation to obey Him just as a child would obey its parents. Is it even possible though to compare one's parents with the divine?Opponent's say that it is not possible to compare the divine with a child's parents. However, to continue with the comparison, if a child were to want to do something and the parent told them "no, because I said so", then, like God, the rationale for the action being wrong is simply because it is commanded. If the command were to change to ordering the child to kill, then the right thing to do would be changed to killing. Likewise, if God's commands are automatically what is right, then if God were to command humans to kill, killing would be a morally just action.Supporters would argue that the situation with God is different. They would also argue that God would not command something that is immoral. But, why wouldn't God command something immoral? The only answers would be because it is wrong or because God only commands that which is right. But...

Find Another Essay On Divine Command Theory. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right?

By Jove: A Brief Look at Polytheistic Divine Command Theory

2036 words - 9 pages action preferred by a different god? In the Greek mythology which serves as something of a backdrop for Antigone, it was not at all uncommon for the Olympian deities to be at odds with each other about this or that thing, or even outright conflict. Another problem raised by a polytheistic Divine Command Theory is the question “Do the gods command an action because it’s morally right, or is it morally right because the gods command it?” The

Why does Plato argue that divine commands can never be genuinely moral commands? Do you agree?

823 words - 3 pages is that God sets such divine commands because they are moral which raises the idea that morality exists as an entity separate to God. Both these ideas suggest that the divine command is not genuinely moral as they are acted upon in the interest of the individual and questions the motives of moral actions.In Plato's argument, he addressees the motives of our moral actions. Since God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omni benevolent he presupposes

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

1341 words - 5 pages outside people's houses, where the effect is to intimidate or torment an individual.When the extremists fail to frighten company owners, they turn to the company's customers and suppliers.. They try to prevent these businesses from continuing to help their targeted business. These suppliers may be banks, building companies, fuel suppliers and transportation services. Because they target people who are not directly involved in animal research

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

710 words - 3 pages outside people's houses, where the effect is to intimidate or torment an individual.When the extremists fail to frighten company owners, they turn to the company's customers and suppliers.. They try to prevent these businesses from continuing to help their targeted business. These suppliers may be banks, building companies, fuel suppliers and transportation services. Because they target people who are not directly involved in animal research

Magistrates of Morality: How the Euthyphro Dilemma Cripples Divine Command Theory

2020 words - 8 pages Throughout human history, the topic of theology has been a central aspect of everyday life. A common denominator of all modern-day religions is that they provide a set of rules which one is to follow in order to live as a good, moral being. When a deity (or a group of deities) commands followers to abide by specific moral standards though a vehicle such as prophets, religious texts or otherwise, this is called Divine Command Theory (DCT). Those

God's Three Attributes and Morality in Aquinas and Divine Command Theory

1809 words - 7 pages Luther. Gerson explicitly states in his writing On the Consolation of Philosophy that "God surely does not will exterior things to be made for the reason that they are good; on the contrary, therefore exterior things are good because God wills them to be such." (Part 2, Prose 2). Biel develops a similar argument which states that "God wills it, it is therefore right" (Book 2, Chapter 37, Question 1, Four Books). Hence, God's will is both goodness

Moral right and wrong are just a matter of opinion.

1547 words - 6 pages individual humans are responsible for their morals, where as social relativism makes the claim that society decides what is right or wrong, i.e. we inherit our moral principles from our society. Both these theories have their problems. With individual relativism moral debate becomes impossible, because if you accept that the individual may be wrong, you cannot agree with individual relativism as according to this theory the individual cannot be wrong

Abraham and Isaac: Was God’s Command Moral?

1968 words - 8 pages maker of morality. In spite of this, Landau argues that the Divine Command Theory cannot be correct because, “…God may not exist (Landau, 2010).” He also argues that because God, in creating morality saw actions such as rape and murder for what they were, “morally neutral,” and there is no basis for God making one thing moral and another immoral. However, I see a big hole in that argument. God, being God and all-knowing, would have seen the havoc

How people would react to tattoos being done to themselves or others around them because of their culture.

604 words - 2 pages a special marking from God, or little creatures crawling underneath the skin to form an odd unrealistic shape. The fact is, cultures have major effects on people's thinking and viewpoints.Tattoos could traumatize the values, beliefs, and culture of the Tekywans. It could make them wonder why God has given this person or persons a special mark and not them. If God didn't give the mark then how on earth did it get there? If someone in the Tekywan

Their eyes were watching God Human right

1323 words - 6 pages Women all around the world are given little to no freedom and equality This is something that has been happening for years, where women are made to submit complete and utter control of their lives to their peers especially men.Their eyes were watching God, showed how some women feel trapped and enslaved by those around them and this is true all over the world for women who face domestic violence and unjust everyday. Janie the main character in

The Moral Right...or The Greater Good?

1244 words - 5 pages should be implemented despite any moral or ethical objections some individuals may have. At first glance, legalizing prostitution may not seem like the best method for reducing STDs, and the preservation of public health might seem like a legitimate reason for continuing the ban on prostitution. However, since current prostitutes operate illegally, they may not have the motivation, education, or access to protection needed to practice safe sex

Similar Essays

Euthryphro And Divine Command Theory Essay

856 words - 3 pages The divine command theory states that something is right or wrong if God commands or forbids it. The theory states that ethical requirements derive from God's commands. The concept is an example of a metaethical theory, one which strives to investigate and clarify the meaning and use of ethical expressions, such as "good", which we see contained within the divine command theory.Several obstacles arise in attempting to clarify what the divine

How Should Theists Interpret The Abraham And Isaac Story? Is This Story An Endorsement Of Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Undermine Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Neither Endorse Nor Undermine...

2122 words - 8 pages approves of them and wrong actions are wrong just because God disapproves of them"Or he may be paraphrased as raising the issue of questioning in whether'a good thing is good because God desires it? Or does God desire it because it is good'.Option 2 evident in the second interpretation that I briefly outlined earlier of the Abraham story was that Abraham believed that his action of killing would be made morally right simply because god commanded

Are Smartphones Improving People's Social Skills Or Harming Them

1606 words - 7 pages Imagine a life without technology, specifically cell phones; no Iphone’s, Blackberry’s or any other type of smart phone. No WhatsApping, emails on the go, taking unexpected pictures and talking on the phone whenever and wherever. All these are the features of the modern cell phone and so the true question is: have cell phones changed human beings socially? The truth is that removing cell phones from people today will undoubtedly leave them lost

The Euthyphro Dilemma Vs. The Divine Command Theory Two Theories Explaining Moral Behavior Explored.

1104 words - 4 pages The divine command theory is the idea that moral actions are those that conform to God's will. For example, murder is wrong because God condemns it. Using this theory, there is a test for determining whether any action is right or wrong: if it conforms to God's will, it is morally permissible, but if it does not, then it is impermissible. This seems very simple. However, the theory breaks down when the will of God is examined. This is the reason