This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Divine Command Theory. Are People's Moral Standards Right Because God Commands Them, Or Does God Command Them Because They Are Right?

1624 words - 6 pages

There are millions of people who believe in God, but among these people the differences lie in to what extent each believes that God has control over what is right and wrong. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right? The Divine Command Theory most simply states that God's commands are what is morally right, and what God forbids is morally wrong. This means that loving one another is right because God commands humans to do so. Advocates of the Divine Command Theory believe this, and believe that morality is the same as that which God commands. Things are good because God created them and/or willed them.Divine Command Theorists believe that there are objective moral standard that are the same for everyone and are independent of individual beliefs. These moral standards are true for everyone regardless of whether or not they believe them or know of them. These ultimate moral standards exist in commands given by God. God commands only things that are good, and he would never command a person to act immorally. God is all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving. God commands these things in order to do what is good for us as humans, and his commands are automatically morally right.The opponents of the Divine Command Theory do not believe that God has that much control over the earth and what is morally just and unjust. They believe that morality is subjective, and that even if there is a God morality would still be subjective. What does it matter anyway what God commands or thinks since it is just another subjective opinion? One of the only reasons that people obey God's commands is that they fear that they will be punished in someway if they do not. They fear that they will go to hell if they do not obey, or that something bad will happen to them. This would mean that their motives are merely self-interested. But, a Divine Command Theory advocate would argue that God created us, and it is our obligation as his creation to obey Him just as a child would obey its parents. Is it even possible though to compare one's parents with the divine?Opponent's say that it is not possible to compare the divine with a child's parents. However, to continue with the comparison, if a child were to want to do something and the parent told them "no, because I said so", then, like God, the rationale for the action being wrong is simply because it is commanded. If the command were to change to ordering the child to kill, then the right thing to do would be changed to killing. Likewise, if God's commands are automatically what is right, then if God were to command humans to kill, killing would be a morally just action.Supporters would argue that the situation with God is different. They would also argue that God would not command something that is immoral. But, why wouldn't God command something immoral? The only answers would be because it is wrong or because God only commands that which is right. But...

Find Another Essay On Divine Command Theory. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right?

Are Smartphones Improving People's Social Skills or Harming Them

1606 words - 7 pages Imagine a life without technology, specifically cell phones; no Iphone’s, Blackberry’s or any other type of smart phone. No WhatsApping, emails on the go, taking unexpected pictures and talking on the phone whenever and wherever. All these are the features of the modern cell phone and so the true question is: have cell phones changed human beings socially? The truth is that removing cell phones from people today will undoubtedly leave them lost

Exposition and Critique of Divine Command Theory

853 words - 4 pages key categories are source, selection, definition of good, scope, objective or subjective, and principle of right action. The source of core morality for divine command theory is God's commands. The selection of this moral principle can be done by consulting a religious text, religious leaders, or through prayer. Goodness under this given theory is what God orients us towards through his commands because God represents goodness. The scope, or the

The Divine Command Theories

1069 words - 5 pages can’t be right for a man or any one at all to do to his wife or to anyone. Where does the line cut of? Maybe when he actually puts his hand on his wife, which in most cultures that is okay. In conclusion, the Divine Command theory may be a well know theory but some not all of their theories are somewhat faulty. As I defended the Culture Relativism theory it seems that it’s the only theory makes the Divine Command theory what it is. God has made each and ever on of us in his own view and not too of us is a like which was a major criticism against the other two arguments. Seem as if the Culture Relativism Theory really understood that.

Christians should be silent on social issues and stay out of people's lives because they have no right to judge or critique others

804 words - 4 pages . So Christians should utilise their numbers and partake in social issues that directly concern them or issues which create, ‘the stirring of the love of God which cannot be contained,’ within them. In Hebrews 5:11 it states, “for those who are mature, who through training have the skill to recognize the difference between right and wrong.” Christians are blessed with a moral compass. It is this compass that we should employ in our struggle to

The Euthyphro Dilemma Vs. The Divine Command Theory Two theories explaining moral behavior explored

1104 words - 4 pages The divine command theory is the idea that moral actions are those that conform to God's will. For example, murder is wrong because God condemns it. Using this theory, there is a test for determining whether any action is right or wrong: if it conforms to God's will, it is morally permissible, but if it does not, then it is impermissible. This seems very simple. However, the theory breaks down when the will of God is examined. This is the reason

The Devine Command Theory

1035 words - 5 pages commands the deeds because they are right or the right deeds are right because he commands them. If the first choice is true, then that means that there are moral standards that stand separate from the will of God. However, with the second choice, the commands of God are actually worthless. In response, the only conclusions are that the commands of God are actually meaningless or there is a standard of morality that exists separately from God. This

By Jove: A Brief Look at Polytheistic Divine Command Theory

2036 words - 9 pages action preferred by a different god? In the Greek mythology which serves as something of a backdrop for Antigone, it was not at all uncommon for the Olympian deities to be at odds with each other about this or that thing, or even outright conflict. Another problem raised by a polytheistic Divine Command Theory is the question “Do the gods command an action because it’s morally right, or is it morally right because the gods command it?” The

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

1341 words - 5 pages outside people's houses, where the effect is to intimidate or torment an individual.When the extremists fail to frighten company owners, they turn to the company's customers and suppliers.. They try to prevent these businesses from continuing to help their targeted business. These suppliers may be banks, building companies, fuel suppliers and transportation services. Because they target people who are not directly involved in animal research

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

710 words - 3 pages outside people's houses, where the effect is to intimidate or torment an individual.When the extremists fail to frighten company owners, they turn to the company's customers and suppliers.. They try to prevent these businesses from continuing to help their targeted business. These suppliers may be banks, building companies, fuel suppliers and transportation services. Because they target people who are not directly involved in animal research

Stereotypes exist because they are grounded in truth

1304 words - 6 pages Very rarely do we find people making statements such as, “Aliens were shopping in the mall” or “Cats were barking like dogs” or “Pakistan has had one of the best leaders in recent times”. These statements are examples of things which we consider to be unarguable, which we laugh over; because no evidence exists that they have taken place. If a person informed their friend, that they saw an alien shopping, or cats barking like dogs, the friend

Why does Plato argue that divine commands can never be genuinely moral commands? Do you agree?

823 words - 3 pages is that God sets such divine commands because they are moral which raises the idea that morality exists as an entity separate to God. Both these ideas suggest that the divine command is not genuinely moral as they are acted upon in the interest of the individual and questions the motives of moral actions.In Plato's argument, he addressees the motives of our moral actions. Since God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omni benevolent he presupposes

Similar Essays

Divine Command Theory Essay

880 words - 4 pages Divine Command Theory to prove the dependence of morality upon God's will, independent moral standards do in fact exist. In order to critique the Divine Command Theory, it is important to first understand it. According to the theory, morality is defined solely by the will of God and no moral standards exist independent of His will. It is simple and unambiguous; once accepted, issues such as moral relativity and objectivity are rendered

Divine Command Theory Essay

674 words - 3 pages action to be performed, this theory also does not allow an atheist to be able to perform a moral action even by mistake. Since the morality of the action depends entirely on if God would have commanded the action in the first place. Throughout history numerous philosophers have attempted to create various versions of the divine command ethics theory. Among the most notable are Descartes and Kant, including the ontological argument. These

Euthryphro And Divine Command Theory Essay

856 words - 3 pages The divine command theory states that something is right or wrong if God commands or forbids it. The theory states that ethical requirements derive from God's commands. The concept is an example of a metaethical theory, one which strives to investigate and clarify the meaning and use of ethical expressions, such as "good", which we see contained within the divine command theory.Several obstacles arise in attempting to clarify what the divine

How Should Theists Interpret The Abraham And Isaac Story? Is This Story An Endorsement Of Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Undermine Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Neither Endorse Nor Undermine...

2122 words - 8 pages approves of them and wrong actions are wrong just because God disapproves of them"Or he may be paraphrased as raising the issue of questioning in whether'a good thing is good because God desires it? Or does God desire it because it is good'.Option 2 evident in the second interpretation that I briefly outlined earlier of the Abraham story was that Abraham believed that his action of killing would be made morally right simply because god commanded