Do All Dualists Believe That There Is Two Way Causal Interaction Between Mind And Body? Which Version Of Dualism – Cartesian Dualism, Parallelism, Or Epiphenomenalism – Is The Most Plausible Theory Of Mind?

1103 words - 4 pages

Jake Radowski
Do all dualists believe that there is two-way causal interaction between mind and body? Which version of dualism - Cartesian dualism, parallelism, or epiphenomenalism - is the most plausible theory of mind?The theory of dualism is based on the separating of the body and the mind into two types of substances-material and immaterial or material and mental. Substance dualists hold the belief the mind consists of spiritual stuff not present in the material world, while the body consists of matter. Cartesian dualism or as is more commonly known today, interactionism claims that physical or material events cause immaterial events and that immaterial events cause material. This therefore brings the premise that communication between the mind and body creates the need for a two-way causal interaction between the material and immaterial worlds. Also present, are alternative forms of dualism: parallelism and epiphenomenalism which remove the present constraint of causal interaction within Cartesian dualism. In this essay I will explain the differing beliefs surrounding two-way causal interaction between mind and body, showing how I have come to the utmost conclusion that epiphenomenalism and parallelism simply cannot be plausible while Cartesian dualism or interactionism cannot be disproven.Not all dualists possess the belief that there is a two-way causal interaction between mind and body. This two-way causal interaction is largely attributed to Rene Descartes and his theory of interactionist dualism. The interaction between the mind and body brings about many differing theories under the umbrella of dualism that can be explored, as two other prominent version of dualism also exist in that of parallelism and epiphenomenalism as I outlined earlier.Now I shall present epiphenomenalism as a counter-intuitive theory and a most unappealing theory of mind to follow.Epiphenomenalism is the second main form of dualism and it says that the material can influence the immaterial and the material but the immaterial cannot influence the material. The Immaterial world cannot cause 'anything'. When we express the belief of epiphenomenalism, epiphenomenalism itself says that the expression of that belief cannot be caused by the immaterial world; it must be caused by the material world. So, the very view of epiphenomenalism can only be caused by the material. Suppose you remove the immaterial component of epiphenomenalism, the way things happen are not changed. If the immaterial can't cause anything, then how could the expression that the immaterial exists, surface in the material world? This makes it seem to me that epiphenomenalism is just neither viable nor plausible as a theory of mind due to the nature in which the causal relation from material to immaterial is essentially redundant.A varying view to Cartesian dualism and is very far from the belief of two-way causal interaction between mind and body says that there is basically no connection whatever...

Find Another Essay On Do all dualists believe that there is two-way causal interaction between mind and body? Which version of dualism – Cartesian dualism, parallelism, or epiphenomenalism – is the most plausible theory of mind?

Analyzing Individuation and Identity In Descartes´ Philosophical View of the Mind-Body Dualism

1292 words - 5 pages ’ principle of mind-body dualism. I give a critical analysis of these two problems, I will first explain the basis of Descartes’ philosophical views. Surprisingly dualism has become synonymous with Rene Descartes that often times it is many just referred to by many as Cartesian dualism, as if this was the decisive line of attack to the issue. The theory behind dualism is that the mind and the body, that mind and matter, are two distinct

Title: Mind and Body: An interpretation on the works of Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza -Talks about "Dualism" and "Double Aspect Theory"

1152 words - 5 pages removed parts of his brain (the material part or the "extension.")From the different views of these two philosophers we see how the mind/body argument continues to be a difficult and controversial topic. Descartes points out the distinction between mind and body, while Spinoza assess' their unity. I found Descartes argument for dualism more plausible, but since philosophers have spent years arguing over the mind/body relation, I believe they will quite possibly remain to do so because of the difficulty in trying to understand the concept of the mind.

Cartesian Dualism and Gilbert Ryle

1871 words - 7 pages seen as a stand-alone edifice, but rather as the collection of all the affiliated buildings (p. 31). While I do believe this is a fair demonstration for the point he is trying to make, I feel the point itself is flawed. Who is Ryle to say that this is the proper way to classify the mind and the body? As easily as he seemed to have thought he defeated Descartes’ argument, it appears his proposition can be quashed just the same. Consider if

The Mind-Brain Problem Concerning Dualism and Materialism

847 words - 3 pages The Mind-Brain Problem Concerning Dualism and Materialism I am faced with the philosophical task of defending either dualism or materialism, depending on which one is most attractive to me. So either I support the theory of dualism, which is the belief that there is both a physical and a spiritual state, or I believe in materialism, which is the belief that everything that exists is material or physical. Although I believe materialism to

Cartesian Dualism vs Logical Behaviorism

1775 words - 7 pages Cartesian dualism. Briefly discussed previously, according to dualism, brains and the bodies are physical things; the mind, which is a nonphysical object, is distinct from both the brain and from all other body parts (Sober 204). Sober makes a point to note Descartes never denied that there are causal interactions between mental and physical aspects (such as medication healing ailments), and this recognition did not lead him to abandon dualism (204

A defence of cartesian dualism from the attacks of modern science.

1321 words - 5 pages Dualism has been given a rough ride. This theory, ascribed mainly to Descartes that the mind is separate from the body, has been justly rejected for many reasons. Descartes theory required the existence of a substance that was mind, as well as a theater in which the mind could view what it internally perceived. As our scientific understanding of how the brain functions to produce consciousness and hence the mind has increased, these two pictures

Argument that Autism is Characterized by the Lack of Theory of Mind

1102 words - 4 pages autism. This essay will therefore argue that autism is characterized by the lack of theory of mind (Premack & Woodruff, 1978, as cited in Baron-Cohen et al., 1985), which is a cognitive mechanism. It will further outline empirical evidence derived from the review of two studies, collectively known as false belief tasks. The Sally-Anne task and the Smarties task, in particular, will be discussed and interpreted in support with the arguing thesis

The Distinction Between the Mind and Body

647 words - 3 pages to the mind is private. The events which reply to the body consist of the physical world, and the events of the mind consist of the mental world. It has been argued whether a person can directly observe all or a select few of situations of one's own private history. According to the official doctrine by Descartes at least some of these situations one has direct and unchallengeable cognisance. It is ordinary to declare branching of two

“Good humor is a tonic for the mind and body.

970 words - 4 pages "Good humor is a tonic for the mind and body. It is the best anecdote for anxiety and depression. It is a business asset. It attracts and keeps friends. It lightens human burdens. It is the direct routine to serenity and contentment." -Greenville Kleiser. Comedy as mentioned is that of a necessary entity in one's everyday life and undertakings. The use of comedy can brighten one's day or simply provide the humor that people desire. When able to

Theory of Mind

1076 words - 4 pages as, ‘The ability to understand or ‘read’ the mind of another individual; the ability to ‘put oneself in the place of another’,’ (Smith and Stevens 2002). Essentially, ‘theory of mind’ is concerned with the ideal that a person can comprehend what another person in the same situation may be thinking, or the way in which they may be feeling, without the necessity for direct contact and communication to establish that information. The paramount

How far is Descartes’ Argument from Indivisibility successful as a justification for the need of a metaphysical distinction between mind and body?

841 words - 3 pages "...unable to distinguish any parts within himself" in the way that the body seems to be able to be divided. Indeed, Descartes reasons that the mind isn't divisible in the way that the body is, postulating that if "...any..part of the the body is cut off nothing thereby has been taken away from the mind' ( Descartes, 1641 6th Mediation). If we accept Descartes' argument that all extended things are divisible, then it follows that that which is

Similar Essays

How Have Dualist Tried To Explain The Apparent Two Way Causal Interaction Between Mind And Body? Which Version Of Dualism Is The Most Plausible Theory Of Mind?

1144 words - 5 pages How have dualist tried to explain the apparent two-way causal interaction between mind and body? Which version of dualism is the most plausible theory of mind?The theory of dualism is based on the separation of the mind and body into two types of stuff - spiritual and physical. Dualists believe that the mind consists of spiritual stuff absent in the material world, while "the body is composed of ordinary matter" . Cartesian, or interactionalist

Mind Body Dualism Essay

951 words - 4 pages cannot be divided, such as smell; there cannot be half or a quarter of a smell. The mind is not an a corporeal or extended substance like the body therefore it is not capable of being divisible. Since the body and the mind do not share the same property of being divisible or indivisible the mind and body are distinctly different. Descartes claim for mind body dualism can be seen as false, I will argue that the mind and body are not distinct as they

Descartes' Arguments For Immateriality Of Mind/Soul Based On The Notion Of Dualism: Body Is Extended Object And Mind/Soul Is Non Extended.

1858 words - 7 pages frames the essence of mental (or immaterial) things. Descartes noted that material, extended things are divisible; and immaterial, non-extended things, regarding minds, are indivisible.The question arise here why did Descartes think that mind is indivisible and body is divisible? Well, considering the body, Descartes states that it is easy to imagine the body being divisible as taking any body, like pencil, and break it in half; now there are two

Philosophy Of Mind: Dualism And Neutral Monism

1465 words - 6 pages things, with early dualists such as Descartes and Plato supporting this area. Dualists emphasise the role of Mind and Body, but also make the distinction that both are separate things. Materialists, such as Democritus, states the world is a collection of ‘atoms’ (separable collections or singular atoms) that compose everything in existence. This view suggests that everyone is made up of these atoms in such a way; it gives us our own distinct image, as