Do People In Public Life Have A Right To Privacy?

1662 words - 7 pages

Do People in Public Life Have a Right to Privacy?People, famous or not, have a right to privacy, which is a basic human right. Although some of them have voluntarily made themselves known to the world, they are still entitled to live a life without others following them all the time, eavesdropping on what they say and being under surveillance. However, in the case of politicians or other powerful people, the right to privacy comes into conflict with another right, the public's right to know. The entitlement and the necessity to get informed are essential to guarantee democracy; this can only be achieved by the freedom of the press. Therefore the right to privacy of certain politicians sometimes has to be neglected to ensure a rightful running of our country. But do we need to get informed about everything there is?We have to distinguish between famous people. Basically there are those who were seeking a public life - or at least knew to some extent what they were going into - and those who were not. Politicians, athletes, actors, musicians, entertainers and members of royalty belong to the former. The latter are ordinary citizens who become significant, because of their extraordinary experiences, for example victims of crimes or tragedies, but also criminals.The amount of ordinary citizens who receive their celebrity status unwillingly is quite big and the privacy of those people needs to be especially respected and maintained. Names, addresses or pictures that could lead to the identification of a person should never be made public. It is not of interest for the readers, and it usually does not make a difference for them, what the name of someone is, but for the one concerned publication of identity could mean embarrassment and harassment. Suspected criminals, for instance, could lose their jobs, their families could break up or their whole lives could get destroyed, even when they are innocent. Apart from that, as soon as someone is well known, they are pursued and harassed by journalists demanding interviews. Also in cases where a family just had to experience the loss of a dear person, the press usually shows little respect for that.While we tend to despise the way the press is treating ordinary people and feel the justification for their right to privacy, we have problems applying the same to people who were seeking a public role. In those cases we tend to think we have a right to the invasion of their privacy, since they have put themselves into the public eye on purpose. We demand to know about their personal lives, but we don't see that this interest is only greediness for amusement.The press is using this human phenomenon and is sacrificing individual privacy for the entertainment of a general public to increase the circulation of a paper. We are satisfying our voyeurism and we even claim that we have a right to it, but by that we submit ourselves to the tabloid values of a mainstream media and put that under the cover of public...

Find Another Essay On Do People in Public Life Have a Right to Privacy?

Should Celebrities Have Their Right to Privacy?

1817 words - 7 pages obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their children’s rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life. Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America

Exemplification Essay: People Have a Right to Die

949 words - 4 pages , but who can be completely ready for the moment when we hear the news that our life will be over soon? In our existence, what greater event besides birth can compete with death? Most of us have pondered the circumstances of our own death, what we’d do, and how we would deal with it. As we grow older, the weight of these musings become more significant, and the plans become more detailed, serious, or urgent. Fred has given a great deal of

The Courts Should Not Have the Right to Make Legislation that the Majority of People Do Not Approve Of

680 words - 3 pages should favor the majority. That way we can be sure that a number of people are being protected, while the minorities are also being protected in other ways. The law should reflect the will of the majority and lawmakers should not have the right to make legislation that the majority of people do not approve of.

Do you think that all sub/counter cultures have a right to exist?

725 words - 3 pages Many cultures coming from history experiences have their own set of rules to obey by and I think these beliefs are correct to them. In my opinion I would like for all good cultures to exist, many people think of cultures as an organization but it can be a good thing and not something of waste. Today in modern society one will assume that cultures are a waste of time and that is completely understandable because the technology of today can do

Euthanasia: A controversial issue paper dealing with whether or not people have the right to choose to die. This paper is in support of euthanasia/assisted suicide.

1257 words - 5 pages includes the ban on assistedsuicide and euthanasia. (Lund, 41)Although at the present time many people believe that terminally illpatients have the right to choose, many also believe that it is unethical.The active termination of a person's life is against the law and violatesmedical ethics. (Outerbridge, 95) "If the Federal courts strike down lawsagainst assisted suicide, they will unleash legions of Jack Kevorkians."(Lund, 42) To start, some doctors

Do Governments Have the Right or Power to Dictate Morals?

1284 words - 5 pages cannot decide for the people what they do or do not believe in. The morality of a situation has to be left to the individual, only and individual can decide for themselves what they believe in. When for example the United States Congress passes moral legislation it goes against the First Amendment and the polity’s right to believe in what they feel is right. Violating this important constitutional right is a fundamental value that American’s share

Federalism: Do States Have the Right to Restrict Illegal Immigration?

806 words - 3 pages only a small portion of what the federal government must do to relieve the burden that illegal immigrants have put on this nation. The big question is how to persuade other illegal immigrants from coming, and what to do with the ones already here. The main goal here is to deny illegal immigrants jobs and public benefits, which is the reason why they come to the United States in the first place. Government benefits will be restricted to legal

In a democracy we have many rights. In a dictatorship people do not have the same rights.

544 words - 2 pages . Pakistan is governed by a group of generals. In Rwanda there are two tribes the Tutsi (10%) and the Hutu (90%) that refuse to work together. The Tutsi control the army and the government. The media in these countries are allowed only to report on what the government thinks the people should know disapproval of the government or its ideas are not tolerated. In Shi Lanika many people have been killed or put in jail because they do not like the

Dating in the workplace: Do employers have the right to regulate the social activities of their employees?

1297 words - 5 pages damaging to the chain of command and overall productivity of an organization, than the implied favoritism of one employee over another. This is particularly true when sex is involved.Utilitarian ethics would favor leaving the decision and responsibilities with the parties involve in the relationship. It is a strong argument that we are dealing with grown adults that have the right to privacy. In an ideal situation, with ideal employees, this strategy

'External public auditors have a direct and positive influence on the way organizations and people in the public service discharge their responsibilities' Discuss

1635 words - 7 pages In this essay, I will concur with Public Audit Forum's statement that 'external public auditors have a direct and positive influence on the way organizations and people in the public service discharge their responsibilities'. However, it is important that we do not ignore the negative influences caused by the auditors. In this essay, I will first discuss the positive influences first before moving onto the counterpart, and finally conclude on

The right to disagree is projected in modern democracies and yet people still suffer because they have different values from the majority. Give your views.

725 words - 3 pages elements demos ("the people") and kratos ("force, power"). Today, the most common form of democracy, whether for a town of 50,000 people or a nation of 50 million, is representative democracy, in which citizens elect officials to make political decisions, formulate laws and administer programs for the public good.The Constitution provides for freedom of speech and of the press, and the Government respects these rights in practice. Since the

Similar Essays

Do People Have The Right To Die?

2661 words - 11 pages their opinion based on their moral beliefs, have the same stance on the issue. These people look at the right to die and physician-assisted suicide in the same way, but they do not see the same thing. There are many people coming from a religious or moral approach who have a strong commitment to preserve life. They believe that above all else, life should be valued, and that our actions as humans should exemplify that. Some trace this back to

Do People Have The Right To Die?

2405 words - 10 pages euthanasia will expand the extremities of its definition and pressure other states to follow. Burke Balch, director of the Department of Medical Ethics at the National Right to Life Committee, said, "The Oregon law is merely a foot in the door. Euthanasia proponents have made it clear that they intend to push America into involuntary euthanasia" (Allen). The Netherlands is a solid example of how voluntary euthanasia increases the accounts of

We Must Have A Right To Privacy

4031 words - 16 pages , yourself. Information privacy--the ability of the individ ual to personally control information about one's self--must be a responsibility for each one of us. The question is what value privacy still has in our lives, and do we want to have a choice between a public world and private world (Karaim 77).   The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU, believes Americans still care very much about their right to privacy. Therefore, they

Should Celebrities Have Their Right To Privacy?

2330 words - 9 pages obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life. Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America