This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Do Animals Have A Say?: Comparative Analysis Of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs And Proud To Be Speciecist

1437 words - 6 pages

The subject of animal testing for human advantages has always been a debatable topic. It is still undecided whether the use of animals for human benefits is morally right. On the other hand it is scientists and researchers who think that animals are good testing subjects because of various reasons such as preventing harmful products or finding cures to diseases. The two essays “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” by Tom Regan and “Proud to be Speciesist” by Stephen Rose talk about the concerns of animal rights but display the opposite viewpoints on the use of animals. Regan's argument has a more broad concept to the matter while Rose takes a deeper dive into exacts with an opinionated personal vibe. As the authors continue writing it is obvious that Regan opposes the use of animals for humans and declares it is not justified, and Rose’s contradiction is the idea of humans’ well-being and existence being way more vital; therefore animals for experimenting is tolerable. Both authors provide the readers with ethos, pathos and logos, but Regan surpasses Rose by supplying his readers with reasonable examples and gained credibility for displaying the entire image of the issue with several real-life illustration. On the other hand, Rose lacks strength in logos which is merely built on just research and experiments from science whereas, Regan is more reliable as he has proven his evidence with solidly in his attempt to keep an open-mind on the issue.
First off, both authors use ethos in their essays that gives them a lot of credibility with animal rights. Regan is very educated in the details that the law provides for animal rights and knows where most of the killings transpire. At the very beginning he mentions how specific species are already endangered and goes on to elaborate how animals are “protected by agreement of the member nations of the International Whaling Commission” (Regan 336). Here, Regan’s ethos is displayed because he is showing who is accountable for the protection of these irreplaceable animals. He clearly provides us with information on the group of people who butcher these blue whales and gives us a hands-on illustration on how the butchers operate the whaling process. “But the crew has other things on their mind. It will take hours of hard work to butcher the huge carcass, a process now carried out at sea” (336). Along the way, Regan is trying to prove why humans should treat animals with respect instead of killing them by saying “the onus of justification must be borne by those who cause the harm to show that they do not violate the rights of the individuals involved” (339). Regan is trying to make the hunters prove that they are not hurting or endangering any whales and to deem their actions as justice. Regan’s credibility overshadows the narrow-minded ideas of Stephen Rose. Rose’s argument about using animals for science shows that his arguments or opinion are only based off of scientific facts and logical thoughts. Since Rose is a...

Find Another Essay On Do Animals Have A Say?: Comparative Analysis of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs and Proud to be Speciecist

Do Animals Have Rights and, If So, Should They Be Protected?

696 words - 3 pages people. As a result of killing them and capturing them, many animals are now extinct.One wonders what gave man the right to treat his fellow inhabitants of the earth in this shameful way. Surely animals have rights too. They have a right to live on earth which is also their home. They have a right to breed and to multiply and live with their families; just like we do. It is strange that man has - for a long time - preached that we (humans) must

Should Animals Have Rights? Essay

733 words - 3 pages emotions like humans do. But can we blame someone for growing up that way? (“The Animal Rights Debate”). Animals have souls, a mind, and a heart that shouldn’t be tampered with. People need to be aware of choices they make, whether it will be affecting the lives of innocent animals. There are many organizations anyone can support, whether people take a big part in the cause or even a little. If everyone takes a part, then it will make a

Animals Have Rights Too

530 words - 2 pages significant that the results can be nothing but inaccurate. To make these creatures endure cruel, often repetitive, and painful tests, only to have a slim margin of them pass standard testing can only be classified as speciesist at best. In the Bible, it states that God gave man dominion over animals. However, it also states to do unto others what they do to you. In the case of animals, it is clear that the golden rule has gone to the wayside, as we

From The Dawn Of Time, Animals Have Helped To Shape Both Human Society And Human Imagination

1481 words - 6 pages that gave our ancestors the lessons that aided them on the meaning of completeness and sustainability.Human progress is a direct result of domestic animals. They have contributed hugely to human well-being and growth of human community. Animals rid people of the hard labour which is required for heavy field work; animals make it possible to transport products and goods to other communities for barter or sale; animal milk is essential for infants who

What Moral and Ethical Obligations do Humans Have to Animals

1887 words - 8 pages and ethical issues which humans have towards non-human animals using battery hens as a case study to highlight the topic. Ultimately concluding that public opinion seems to be growing in favour of the banning of battery hens. Animal welfare philosophy: Philosophers and scholars have long debated the human moral and ethical obligations towards non-human animals. The opposing paradigms of animal ethics are formed by numerous underlying belief

Animal Rights - Do We Really Love Our Animals?

2433 words - 10 pages artificial skin to gauge the biological responses of human skin to their products"(PETA 2). Since there are no efficient databases to hold information gathered from these tests, it therefore must be repeated, and this costs money as well as the lives of millions of innocent animals. They have the capability to feel just we humans do, and we as humans should strive to be humane. When you take a baby cow from its mother,that mother cow is going to

Do Animals Have Thought?

2019 words - 8 pages that lead me to the bigger question I want to address. Do animals have thought? And if so, how similar is it to the human definition of thought, and mindfulness? In this paper I will argue a point similar to one discussed by philosopher Marc Hauser, that animals cognitive abilities form a continuum from the least complex to the most complex, and that there is no great discontinuity between human and non- human animal cognition (Hauser). Hauser

Do Animals Have Emotions?

1289 words - 5 pages wild creatures that we can use in our advantage. Or maybe, animals are just in this planet to use their fur, their skin or to use them in scientific tests. Many people don't believe that animals have feelings but they do. Recently, many scientists, animal behaviorist and zoologists have been studying animals and their behaviors and the possibility of them having some sort of feelings. What did they discover? Animals feel pain, love, loneliness

What do the texts you have studied have to say about the positive and/or negative effects of institutions?

1131 words - 5 pages individual. It shows us how the fight for power within this institution can prove to be fatal, but the positive is that Brett achieved what he was aiming for.After analysis of the above, it can be concluded that the institution has many influences on an individual, both positive and negative in nature. It's the lessons that are taken out of these experiences that determine the true effect that it can have. Institutions such as the farm consist of a

Animal Rights and the Dominant Worldview toward Animals

1890 words - 8 pages ; on the other hand the biocentric worldview definitely favours and agrees on animals rights. I will argue and say yes, animals do deserve rights. I do feel that animals have much right to be considered as a part of our society and that since they feel pain just like humans they do deserve their own rights and equality. I reason for the biocentric worldview as I see it more ethical and correct towards our society. Peter Singer who is a proactive

Animal Rights vs Human Rights

1173 words - 5 pages animals that reacts to situations. Not only is the ability to feel pain or think a subject of discussion for animals to have rights, but animals do have a similarity in our genetic structure. Since the origin of species by Charles Darwin, it has been known that human beings evolved from animals and so we are related by a common descent to all other animals and for this reason alone, we owe duty to all animals regardless of where they are human

Similar Essays

Analysis Of "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs" English Comp 1 Analysis Essay

876 words - 4 pages Riveros 1 Stephanie Riveros Lecturer Gibson EN 1103-61 21 October 2013 Speaker for the Speechless Animals are used for multiple purposes. Although we might use animals, Tom Regan’s essay entitled “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” discusses the immorality of the harm put on animals to supply our own needs and wants. It argues that we as humans should put an end to the animal harm. The essay has many valid arguments but is weakened by unsupported

Say Yes To Animal Bill Of Rights

650 words - 3 pages animals Welfare Act towards their elephants. A Bill of Rights for animals could stop these cruel acts occurring to our animals. Everyone should understand that animals are producing food and leather goods. Animals do not deserve these unrespectful acts towards them. Animals are self depend, they recognize their owners. Animals’ protect us in many different way. Dogs have a lot to say, and they do it by barking. They bark to go out, come

From Human Wrongs To Human Rights

1223 words - 5 pages become a fundamental part of global law and policy. However, they have not always been that way. Catastrophic events in history that claimed thousands of lives ran their vicious course before it was recognized that there had to be human rights established. The most famous example of genocide is the Holocaust, which killed around six million Jews. After the Holocaust, the United Nations recognized that there had to be human rights put into place. Two

Animal Rights, Human Wrongs Vs. The Damned Human Race

503 words - 2 pages Animal Rights, Human Wrongs vs. The Damned Human Race “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” by Tom Regan and “The Damned Human Race” by Mark Twain are more similar than different. Both of the authors are informing the readers about the mentality of some human beings in regard to animals. One of the authors, Tom Regan provides several examples of the tactics man uses to harm animals. Mark Twain’s method compares so called lower animal to the human being