This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Do Plato And Sartre Coincide? Essay

764 words - 4 pages

In Plato’s The Allegory of the Cave and Sartre’s Existentialism, one can follow two different ideals of philosophy on how a human should lead their life. Plato suggested there are two pursuits in the world- a life inside the cave and another outside the cave. When free and unbounded from the cave, a person can build perspective on the real outer world, and in the other hand the world inside the cave is bounded to human senses that are full of illusions created by many powerful forces like politics and society.
Plato theorized that a human can be enlighted on reality and morality only from education and exploration, which lies outside the cave. Plato’s pursuit ...view middle of the document...

And he adds you build your own future, it doesn’t seem constraining because the truth is every individual should be responsible.
In the other hand, it is true that people deny truth in many situations because they are bounded by aspects of society and nature. It is difficult to contrast Plato and Sartre in the aspect that Plato defends humanity because the harsh truth is people aren’t completely free as Sartre suggests. Plato pities the ones that are unknown to the light, he wrote, “[he] will not be ready to laugh; he will first ask whether that soul of man had come out of the brighter life, and is unable to see because unaccustomed to the dark, or having turned from the darkness to the day is dazzled by excess of light”. It seems unfortunate on how things are not straight forward as both the philosophers explained.
However, another aspect of existentialism when Sartre writes, “Every man ought to say to himself, ‘Am I really the kind of man who has the right to act in such a way that humanity might guide itself by my actions?’ And if he does not say that to himself, he is masking his anguish” makes existentialism sound more distinguished. This statement is not nearly evident in...

Find Another Essay On Do Plato and Sartre Coincide?

Sartre and the Rationalization of Human Sexuality

2644 words - 11 pages Sartre and the Rationalization of Human Sexuality ABSTRACT: Sartre rationalizes sexuality much like Plato. Rationalization here refers to the way Sartre tries to facilitate explanation by changing the terms of the discussion from sexual to nonsexual concepts. As a philosophy which, above all, highlights those features of human existence which seem most resistant to explanation, one would expect existentialism to highlight sexuality as a

Rejection of Existentialism Essay

1011 words - 4 pages that humans in themselves must be the start of all things. He rejected the idea that God could coincide with free will. While existentialism does raise some important and relevant points, its core that existence precedes essence is not a valid one, nor does a different view eliminate the possibility of free will. Works Cited Satre, Jean Paul. “Existentialism is a Humanism”. April 30, 2011

Jean Paul Sartre

855 words - 3 pages " and she is hidden from view most of the time. Sartre gives her a wedding ring to wear when she and him go out together. Yet the two of them never have any children and they do not get married. Sartre has many other mistresses as well throughout his odd life, and he always tells De Beauvoir about them. To his mistresses he writes letters. Many, many letters Sartre wrote, sometimes more than ten a day.In his later years, Sartre begins to slip up

Etymology of Epistemology

992 words - 4 pages epistemology has many branches and roots informing about knowledge and truth. Three philosophers that help us better grasp the concept of epistemology are Plato, Henry David Thoreau, and Jean-Paul Sartre. Although from different periods of time these three have a deeper understanding than most that should be re-examined. In Plato’s “The Apology of Socrates,” it implies two things: 1) knowledge is unattainable by humans, but attainable by gods, and 2


1527 words - 6 pages the entire human race. "We do not only mean that he is responsible for his own individuality, but that he is responsible for all men." (Sartre, 103) We must think collectively he contends, what is good for us should be good for others. Each choice we make should be in conjunction with the awareness of how that choice will affect others. "I am responsible for myself and for everyone else. I am creating a certain image of man of my own choosing

Jean-Paul Sartre: On the Other Side of Despair

3067 words - 12 pages —consciousness is, then, always directed at something other than itself. As Howells explains, "in this context Sartre positions himself in relation to the Kantian ‘unity of apperception’, arguing that although the ‘I think’ must be able to accompany all of my representations, it does not always do so, at least explicitly" (474). According to Sartre, one may turn one’s attention, at any moment, away from the task at hand and direct it towards oneself

John-Paul Satre

1471 words - 6 pages one system of order. Derived from that, they do not feel reasoning is the sufficient way for formulating the facts about the world, and as a result we all hold the responsibility of making our own choices. No one person can say that he or she has been wrought by any other factor than him or her.Sartre has formed many thoughts on his own through Existentialism. He has derived thoughts on personality, freedom, and reality just to name a few. Sartre

The Concept of 'Bad Faith' in the Philosophy of Sartre

1625 words - 7 pages that we as humans constantly confront. The ‘faith’ component of bad faith shows its epistemic nature. We as humans, on some level, know complete truth of our existence. On the contrary, in bad faith we as humans strive to distract ourselves from this truth by lowering our requirements of evidence and as such; the need for appropriate inspection, as regarded by Sartre we do when believing priarmily based on our faith. In ‘Being and Nothingness

Love and Freedom

3862 words - 15 pages Love and Freedom What is love? Is it something we do or something we can know? Some classify love as something that you feel for some people sometimes. It is often linked or used interchangeably with lust. Others feel that it is something that is constant and untouched by judgement and feeling. The only common denominator for love is that it is something that is desirable; it is something that we want. So what do people want? Many

Sartre's Philosophy

919 words - 4 pages , according to Sartre, clearheaded and in good faith. Because he is acting in good faith, he is not pursuing a fundamental project in an attempt to circumvent the possibility of anguish. The outcome of this path of good faith is that man manifests his freedom authenticates and ultimately this freedom is real.      Those who do not act clear headed will inevitably fall into anguish; which is what is felt by those who cannot except that

Sartre's Existentialism. - How should an existentialist live according to Sartre? To what extent do you agree?

910 words - 4 pages this decision would be a good one for him, but if all of mankind was to go ahead with the insulin treatment, it would not be good for everyone.Through establishing the idea that "existence precedes essence", and therefore "man is condemned to be free", Sartre comes to the conclusion that a 'good life' is obtainable through consideration of the whole of mankind in personal decision making. Although Sartre's ideas flow well from each other and do

Similar Essays

Discuss One Disagreement Or Agreement Between Plato And Aristotle. Who Do You Think Is More Consistent With Greek Cultural Tradition?

675 words - 3 pages Plato, student of Socrates, and Aristotle, who became Plato’s own pupil, were two of the most influential philosophers in history. To begin, Plato (427-347 BC) was a young philosopher that established a school called the Grove of Academia in 387 BC. The purpose of this was to exonerate the name of his professor Socrates along with the support of dialogues he had written, such as the Republic. His student, Aristotle (384-322 BC), was referred to

A Critical Analysis Of Plato's And Sartre's Views On Existence

2480 words - 10 pages Dictionary does not make a distinction between existence and living. However, philosophically there is the view that existence is different from living. What then is the meaning of existence in philosophy? In order to answer this question we shall examine how philosophers have used the term in their various works. Our attention shall focus on Plato and Sartre. Plato’s view on existence Plato’s view on existence can be understood by discussing

Plato's Allegory Of The Cave Essay

1521 words - 6 pages with " Where I lived and What I lived for"; and Jean Paul Sartre with " Existentialism". Generally, Plato, Thoreau, and Sartre suggested that human life should be free. They differ in what that freedom is. Plato thinks it is found in the world of intellect, Thoreau thinks freedom is found in nature, and Sartre thinks freedom is found in subjectivity of individual. Plato found freedom in the world of intellect. Let's take a look at his quote

Essay Assignment #3

1190 words - 5 pages Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” Sartre’s short piece on Existentialism from the Norton reader, and Jhumpa Lahiri’s “Sexy” from Interpreter of Maladies. Students must use “Sexy” as their primary text, but select their secondary text of either Plato OR Sartre. Prompt 1: Choose one of the major characters in the story “Sexy” and decide whether that character decides what is important in life in a way that would be closer to Plato, as expressed