This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

“Does The End Ever Justify The Means?”

915 words - 4 pages

Edward Snowden is a 29-year old male who leaked the greatest mysteries about what the NSA, National Security Agency, is actually doing. His confidential leaks are some of the most crucial political leaks in history. On the other hand, Snowden created controversy in America, and cause people to distrust the government, even though he used illegal means to obtain this information. (Luce) Edward used rhetoric, culture, and deception in reports to the public. However, the question appears, “does the end ever justify the means?” In my opinion, I do think that the end of this dilemma is justified.
Edward, a former employee of the NSA, released to the public, confidential information about our ...view middle of the document...

” (Greenwald) This quote is extremely persuasive. Edward Snowden is trying to deceive the public into believing he leaked the information for no personal gain. Even though, Snowden did receive money from selling these secrets to journalists. (Wittes) Following the Snowden case, Edward’s lawyer used rhetoric in defense. He asked, “Who did he betray, and how did he betray them?” (Kerwick) This use of rhetoric allows people to question if obtaining information to inform the American public that their rights are infringed on is moral, or if Edward a traitor due to the way he obtained this information.
Nevertheless, all this information leads a person to question, “Does the end justify the means?” In the Edward Snowden case, there are two main sides that can be taken; he is a traitor to the United States of America as a whole, or he is a hero. Edward Snowden did obtain the confidential documents of the NSA by illegal means of hacking. On the contrary, he did enlighten the American people to whom they can really trust in our government system. (Wittes) Yet, today Edward Snowden is a fugitive to our country, hiding in Russia. If the end really does justify the means is all in opinions and personal preferences.
In my opinion, Edward Snowden’s actions were justified by the amount of unknown information brought to light to the public. At times, people need to go against moral laws to do good for other people. By awakening the information about illegal phone tapping, it shows that as a citizen of the United States, you may not have all the rights you are “guaranteed” by the Constitution.
In conclusion, Edward Snowden’s leaks can be used to demonstrate the theme of “does the...

Find Another Essay On “Does the End Ever Justify the Means?”

“Does the End Justify the Means?”

992 words - 4 pages "Does the end ever justify the means?" By definition, this phrase means that a good outcome excuses any wrong that are committed to attain it ("Idioms & Phrases."). Not only is this question strongly debated in everyday conversation, but it played a substantial role in the play of Julius Caesar. The differing opinions on this question lead to the deaths of various characters within the story. In the play of Julius Caesar one of the main

Does the End Justify the Means?

712 words - 3 pages everywhere. Are these conflicts just or will the outcome not outweigh the losses that will inevitably happen. One such case that we can look at to see if the end did justify the means is by looking at both sides of the first Gulf War. During the first Persian Gulf War, the United States had a very distinct goal. That goal was to enforce the United Nations Security Council by removing Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi military from Kuwait. To see if the end

Does The End Justify The Means?

881 words - 4 pages lost their reason. Bear with me. My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” (Shakespear 882-883) Another act of betrayal occurs in Act IV when Octavious and Antony decide to not give Lepidus any power, and to take some of Caesars will for themselves. (Shakespeare) The topic; “does the end justify the means”; can be summed up in one phrase “A good outcome excuses any wrongs committed to attain it

Does Love Justify the Means in The Great Gatsby

1101 words - 4 pages realize what they have after it is gone. All of the relationships in the story have at least one person who does not remain faithful, sometimes even both partners do not remain faithful. But in the end of it all, they go back to the way it was before and state that they went back because of love.

Discuss George's actions at the end of the novel. How can we justify what he does to Lennie? How can we condemn it?

827 words - 3 pages Discuss George's actions at the end of the novel. How can we justify what he does to Lennie? How can we condemn it?Although murder is morally incorrect, mercy killing can be justified as it may prevent a later inevitable and painful death. In the novella 'Of Mice and Men' written by John Steinbeck, the character George shoots his friend, Lennie. Whilst George's actions can be condemned, George had good intentions towards the death of his friend

When the Ends Justify the Means

952 words - 4 pages When the Ends Justify the Means It is commonly believed by both lay people and political philosophers alike that an authoritative figure is good and just so long as he or she acts in accordance with various virtues. If the actions of a ruler are tailored toward the common good of the people rather than himself, then that ruler is worthy of occupying the status of authority. By acting in accordance with social and ethical norms, the ruler is

Do the Ends Justify the Means

1808 words - 8 pages normal life. This is such a big problem because if in the end it does not work, it will be a waste of not only money, but time as well. The argument that most people have about continuing the research and trials is that the ends will justify the means. The end to the human trails is that they well be able to have a cure for patient with these diseases. Many people can look upon this as killing one to save a thousand. People can kill the cell

The End Justifies the Means

920 words - 4 pages laying down their lives to serve a greater purpose. The end justifies the means.However in most situations this thesis statement cannot apply and is irrelevant.Such an example is that of smoking. Every breath of smoke you or others inhale your life is shortened by a matter of hours. Most do not realize this once they start but they soon see the light. In this case the End does not Justify the means because it is a form of suicide. Wasting your hard

Does the science justify the headline?

930 words - 4 pages . The lowest factor sun cream sold in the UK is factor 8 (reference). The entire article is just 210 words long and does not go into detail of what the tomato paste actually does. It does however state that the active ingredient is thought to be lycopene, and that it neutralises harmful molecules in the skin. The name of the study that the article is based off is “Tomato paste rich in lycopene protects against cutaneous photodamage in humans in

The Ends Justify the Means: Wrong is Wrong

1746 words - 7 pages Mercedes Briscoe Ms.Glisson ELA III 5-29-14 Wrong is Wrong Saying that “the ends justify the means” is an invalid statement , those agreeing with this statement obviously believe that killing, stealing, and cheating does not matter as long as it has a good outcome and the goal is obtained.The phrase “the ends justify the means” refers to the morality of an action

Social Influence Research - Do the Ends Justify the Means?

1012 words - 4 pages Social Influence Research - Do the Ends Justify the Means? To what extent does the importance of social influence research, justify the methods used in its investigation? The debate about ethics in psychology focuses on two areas: protection of participants and benefiting society. This is a double obligation dilemma as if some psychologists are not allowed to do certain experiments because of ethical restraints

Similar Essays

Does The End Ever Justify The Means?

931 words - 4 pages Does the end ever really justify the means? This is a phrase that is quite common amongst readers, namely when reading a tragedy such as The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. When reading this drama, a person may sit and ponder this question for quite some time, depending on what side they agree with and how the “justice” was portrayed, and decide if it was even justice at all. My personal opinion on this question after reading Julius Caesar is that the

Does The End Ever Justify The Means?

714 words - 3 pages One of the most hotly debated topics in the field of ethics is the question, “Does the end justify the means?” This topic is divided on the primary basis of whether an objectionable action can be justified by the end result of the action or actions. It is fair to argue that as long as the end result is considered beneficial by a majority of the population, any course of action to achieve that result would be considered justified. Another

Does The End Ever Truly Justify The Means?

1039 words - 5 pages out that the end certainly does not justify the means because it proves that one man’s gullibility can ultimately be his downfall and his reasons are not convincing enough or he cannot evoke enough pathos to prove that the end does indeed justify the means. Brutus loved his Rome very much and that was a cultural idea shared among all people of ancient Rome. But Caesar was held so high that they wanted him to be king and so no one could ever let

Does The End Justify The Means

905 words - 4 pages “Does the end ever justify the means?” This question is posed after reading The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. In this play, Brutus and the other conspirators murdered Julius Caesar because they thought he was a corrupt leader for the city of Rome. They thought that they were not doing anything wrong because they were doing it for the good of the people. Were their actions indeed for the good of the people, and if so, did that make the murder