This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Drone Strikes Essay

1375 words - 6 pages

The use of unmanned aerial assault vehicles (UAVs), or drones, for strikes around the world has been a question of ethics and morality ever since the technology developed. The United States Air Force, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Homeland Security, Coast Guard and Central Intelligence Agency have utilized these types of aircraft in the conduct of their operations, both to strike in a foreign country, and to secure our borders. Both sides, for and against their use, have irrefutable points. The purpose of this article is not to refute the opposing position, but rather show that their use is both morally acceptable and necessary for the security of our nation’s interests both domestic and abroad.’ The article will be split into two major parts, the first covering the foreign use of drones, particularly in the country of Pakistan, and the second covering the use of drones within and around our borders for both security and law enforcement.
The use of UAVs in the engagements in Pakistan have been in controversy since before the first such operation. There is much more controversy, therefore, on exact numbers for militant casualties and noncombatant (NC) casualties as a result of these strikes. Even the Pakistani government itself has not held a firm position on this matter. The primary opposition to the use of UAVs is that too many civilians are killed as a result of them. This is very true. A single noncombatant person killed as a result of the usage of drones is too many. Unfortunately, nothing is perfect. Whether you agree or disagree in war, noncombatant casualties have to be accepted as inevitable. The Department of Defense can try to reduce the amount of NC casualties as much as possible, but it is impossible to make that number zero. With the technology employed in these drones, the U.S. Air Force can shoot a missile through a specific window of a specific building nearly anywhere in the world without much risk for a miss. Supposing there is a strategic target in the room that has been attacked, a minimal amount of ordinance can be used and that ordinance could be effective from altitudes of a few miles or more. The problem with this is that if an unfortunate civilian haplessly walks into the wrong room at the wrong time, or the intel is bad, innocent lives could very easily be lost. The opponents to the foreign use of drones argue that a strike team of U.S. soldiers would be less likely to pull the trigger on that hapless civilian. In addition, a squadron of U.S. soldiers would have a higher chance (although admittedly not zero) of apprehending the target and associates without any unnecessary casualties whatsoever. As convenient as that sounds, there is too much of a cost to take that course of action in many cases. The risk of life to our soldiers notwithstanding, there is also a much higher risk of the loss of equipment and a greater risk of mission failure. Opponents argue that the cost of a human...

Find Another Essay On Drone Strikes

Drones: Ethical for War Essay

786 words - 4 pages . Today, drones make up around one-third of all military aircraft in the U.S. military (Drone Age). Although the military has been using drones for a long time, there is still heated debate on the ethics of using these UAVs to perform drone strikes. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States military is ethical because they reduce material costs, are more efficient, and reduce the amount of U.S. casualties. Drones are more efficient

Drone Warfare Essay

1340 words - 5 pages right to life, as well as other international laws or rights. They say that the amount of civilians killed in these drone strikes makes the use of drones a war crime. They also claim that the governments global war on terror is being used as an excuse to kill people. The people who are for drone warfare would be government organizations like the CIA, NSA and the military; these groups see the uses of drone warfare. Also, there companies like

Is Targeted Killing Justified?

1215 words - 5 pages special operations missions with boots on the ground to cruise missiles to drone strikes. In the United States, the primary method of targeted killing has been with drone strikes and has been focused on attacks in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan. The Legality of Targeted Killing: Types of Targeted Killing: Targeted attacks are predominantly done by either a drone strike or with a kill/capture mission. In a drone strike, a missile is

Drones are the Future

2033 words - 9 pages they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance. Some of the most common misconceptions about drones arise due to the lack of knowledge about what drones are. A drone is a remote controlled, pilotless aircraft that can be used to survey an area, conduct stealth missions, and deliver supplies into difficult to reach areas (Drone). Unmanned aircrafts are also, contrary to

Drones Have Changed the Character of War

2434 words - 10 pages natural tangent to conduct precision strikes on targets and known adversary locations; yet whilst minimising the risk of collateral damage to friendly forces, civilians or infrastructure. This capability to deliver drone strikes with almost certain accuracy has become an attack of choice lf the US military and allies. The congested and cluttered nature of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq catalysed the use of drones where the location and

test

997 words - 4 pages American Spectator, a right-wing site, written by Conor Friedersdorf. Friedersdorf is writing to target audiences who are educated individuals who care about foreign affairs with knowledge or interest of the legal issues involved. Shocking for a right winged website to not be in support of drone strikes, The American Spectator even allows Friedersdorf to state, "Critics on the right and the left are concerned about the constitutionality of killing

Drones

712 words - 3 pages unmentioned stealth missions. Because drone strikes add collateral damage, it has become necessary, from now on, to reduce the further usage of drones and halt drone-technology from advancing. After researching upon this controversial issue and considering both extremes of the spectrum, it has become very important for us Americans to understand and take action against this new menace. Although UAVs were being secretly being tested in the 90s by the CIA

Ethnical Implications of Drones

1044 words - 5 pages . The missiles were remotely controlled and guided to their targets by an operator, much like modern drones (“Drones” n.p.). After the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, the United States ramped up its drone manufacturing and use astronomically (“Drones” n.p.). Before being armed with missiles and bombs, drones were armed with powerful cameras to conduct surveillance operations. The first drone strikes were aimed at terrorist leaders such as

Uneasy Drones

905 words - 4 pages world from a new perspective. The drone age seems to be ready for takeoff. Unfortunately many people are very critical of drones. They are highly concerned about their use. So far they probably heard mainly about drone strikes that were unnecessary and caused collateral damage and loss of many innocent lives. Even though this is extremely tragic, the benefits of using drones outweighs the negative effects. Drones help soldiers survive and strike

Drones: Peace Keeper or Terrorist Teacher

1842 words - 8 pages , such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical

Drones Strikes Essay

1085 words - 5 pages environment, additionally it is causing many civilians lives. Lastly, drones are causing pakistan people to not not have freedom in their own country. Drones strikes are an unacceptable act because it is destroying the homes of many pakistani people. Tons of Pakistani homes have been destroyed because of drone strikes.The Pakistani economy is beginning to decrease. People have to walk outside and see dead bodies all over the ground

Similar Essays

The Legitimacy Of U.S. Drone Strikes

1899 words - 8 pages and educated guesses. The study found that between 2004 and 2012, the United States has deployed 346 drone strikes causing approximately 2,570–3,337 deaths. Furthermore, the study revealed that civilian casualties ranged between 18 and 26 per cent of the deaths in Pakistan (Boyle, 2013). Additionally, “President Obama launched more than six times as many drone strikes as President Bush did throughout his eight years in office” (Boyle, 2013, p. 2

Drone Attacks And It’s Legal And Moral Battle

1428 words - 6 pages forbidden and constitutes as a war crime. Mamana Bibi was not a terrorist but an active citizen picking a plant. United States drone strikes have been actively deployed in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. The President has attempted to justify drone strikes by stating they are "necessary, legal and just", although this reasoning was aimed at al-Qaida terrorists, not civilians. (Guardian) The United States, has failed to discuss the actions that took

Use Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles In Warfare

1234 words - 5 pages surveillance can be targeted if portraying certain behaviors that fit a terrorist’s profile. It is estimated that drone strikes are responsible for an estimated 4000 deaths in strikes located throughout Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia. Many of these deaths have been reported as non-militants, it is estimated that about 15% of people who die in drone strikes are civilians. But with recent advancement in surveillance technology UAVs are being

Drone Persuasive Essay

2038 words - 8 pages proportion of good aspects to bad aspects that the action had. Did the good outweigh the bad? In the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the bad definitely outweighed the good, where although we may have saved many Americans lives, hundreds of thousands civilians died, and an entire country was devastated. So when developing an opinion on the use of drone strikes, I want you to keep in mind proportionality, and ask yourself, does the good outweigh