This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Durkheim, Weber And Marx Essay

1228 words - 5 pages

Three men, each with their own views of society and each called Fathers of Sociology and Modern Sociology by the people that continue to study their theories as it relates to society. In order to compare and contrast them, each must be given a short synopsis (if that is ever possible) of a key point in their theory and interpretation of society. Durkheim introduces us to the concept of “anomie”. Anomie, as explained by Durkheim’s theory, is the breakdown of the influence of social norms on individuals within a society. Durkheim explained mechanical solidarity, in early society, where there was not a lot of diversity, people lived in small communities (generally farming), had economic similarity and were mostly homogenous. Durkheim argues that in the last five-hundred years, society has shifted to an organic solidarity which is defined as a society based on interdependency. Society has moved to a heterogeneous form in society. People within society now have the ability to leave the original community, to have smaller families, live in larger communities. Durkheim goes on to explain that when people go through the transition from mechanical to organic solidarity, there is uncertainty and a slowness to adapt. He defines this state of anomie as a state of “normlessness”, or insufficient normative regulation. As a structural-functionalist, Durkheim believed that harmony, rather than conflict, defined society, and studied the division of labor, religion and suicide from this perspective.

Karl Marx, on the other hand focuses his theories on the relationship between human lives and a capitalist economy. The theory of historical materialism provides a framework for analyzing human society and the laws of its development. Marx identifies a capitalist society by dividing it into two major social classes. The Bourgeoisie are the individuals that own the production means; for example the land, the machinery, raw materials, factories. The Proletariat own little and provide the labor and in so doing, receive wages from the Bourgeoisie. These two classes are dependent on each other since the Bourgeoisie need the Proletariat to produce the goods and services where they receive their profits however, the Proletariat (working class) are paid low wages and are exploited by the Bourgeoisie. Marx argues that eventually the Proletariat will rise up and revolt, creating and developing their own class.

Lastly Max Weber theory of “ideal type” is not something that is real. He uses this methodology of ideal type in determining what makes bureaucracies successful, what they are and what they should be. The theory is used as a measuring stick and is used in any situation where measuring the reality of something against what its purest form should be. Weber theorizes that this bureaucracies operate on five separate levels which are:
1. Division of labor – specific tasks are given to different individuals who may work together but within their...

Find Another Essay On Durkheim, Weber and Marx

Marx, Weber and Religion Essay

2924 words - 12 pages motivations, Weber posits that human conduct is governed by innumerable factors (Ekstrand 2000:30-2; Lowith 1993:63; Turner 1993:27). These factors cannot be clearly distinguished as sacred or profane as Durkheim proposed (Turner 1993:27), but are derived from both emotional and cultural experiences (Van Krieken et al. 2010:359). Both Durkheim and Marx regarded human behaviour as a direct response to structural influence, whereas Weber accounts for

Marx and Weber Essay

632 words - 3 pages Two great socialogists Karl Marx Max Weber had different view about stratification in the society.Weber's point of view has some differences and simmilarities to Marx's. Marx arques that any human society devided into of two combination of people or two classes that constantly oppose each. One class tend to be take dominant position over the other class. Marx said that these two classes have different relation to the industry that rule economy

Compare and contrast Marx and Weber

4185 words - 17 pages During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologist. Both their views on the rise of capitalism have various similarities and differences. They believe that capitalism is relatively new to the modern world. Their views differ on the rise of capitalism. Regardless of Marx and Weber's differences, both theorists agree that capitalism is a system of highly impersonal relations.Karl Marx was born on

The Three Sociologists: Marx, Durheim, and Weber

1188 words - 5 pages without drawing on some kind of theoretical ideas.” Per-ceptions of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber (who can also be known as the ‘holy trinity’ of the three founding fathers) theories have been interpreted for hundreds of years, leading to them having a remarkable impact in history and to-day’s society. However the relevance of these theories in contemporary sociology raises a magnitude of different questions and opinions on how the theories

Social Stratification According to Marx and Weber

1548 words - 6 pages Marxism, Max Weber, functionalism and postmodernism. The functionalist view of social stratification is being inevitable and also to perform a positive function for society. Their argument for this is that an unequal distribution of rewards and privileges found in the class system allows for its most talented members to be attracted from society and put in the most important roles (Davis and Moore). However, there is a short supply on talent

Similarites Between the Theories of Max Weber and Karl Marx

1029 words - 4 pages Max Weber and Karl Marx has often been regarded as influential theorists who both analyzed in how the society is constructed in relationship to its economic conditions, more specifically on the division of labour. Both the labour and economics create a force on how societies are shaped and because of that Weber and Marx each developed a unique theory on how individuals react and how societies are formed. Many individuals say that, Marx and

Marx, Weber and their Critique of Global Capitalism

1739 words - 7 pages While Marx and Weber had divergent analyses of capitalism, their evaluations of modern global capitalism have a common thread of thought. They both view the implementation of global capitalism, where subordinating individual needs and desires to achieve the end goal of accumulating wealth for wealth’s sake, as irrational and unreasonable. Because of that commonality, it is feasible to draw from both analyses to explain global capitalization

Social Theories of Karl Marx and Maw Weber

945 words - 4 pages There are many sociological issues in the world today that can relate back to the concept theories that Karl Marx and Max Weber formed many years ago. Although there are too many for us to go further in depth on, I chose to primarily focus on Racism and Classism. With the perspectives of these theorists in mind I can explain how Racism, Classism, in conjunction with Feminism are among the largest social problems human beings face in the world

Matters of Psychological Difference in Religious Analysis: Psychological Assessments in Weber and Durkheim

1324 words - 5 pages Elizabeth Jennings 3/10/10 Matters of Psychological Differences in Religious Analysis Psychological considerations have proved invaluable to religious analysis. Because religion is both an internal and an external institution, it is difficult to exclude the attributes which are primarily mental. Both Durkheim and Weber use psychological interpretations, but their approach drastically differs. Durkheim resolutely claimed to avoid psychological

Max Weber’s and Mircea Eliade’s Disagreement with Durkheim, Marx and Freud

1996 words - 8 pages and Eliade determined that the reductionist view did not give enough insight into religion, because they focused on primitive culture to say what religion was, information was confined to only western civilization, and in Freud’s case religion was neurotic. Thus, Weber and Eliade rejected the reductionist views of Durkheim, Marx, and Freud. In Max Weber’s refute of the three reductionists his ideal types point of view is applicable, which are

The Significance for Economic Anthropology of the Work of Marx and Durkheim

1669 words - 7 pages What is the significance for economic anthropology of the work of Marx and Durkheim? Introduction The works of Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim have proved that they were indeed the finding fathers of modern social theory during the late 19th to the early 20th century. Along with others (i.e. Weber, Simmel, Veblen etc.) they had laid down the foundations of our understanding of the relationships that are held between culture and society on one hand

Similar Essays

Comparing And Contrasting Sociological Theorists Max Weber, Emile Durkheim And Karl Marx

1711 words - 7 pages Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences. The first theorist to

Why Do Writers Such As Durkheim, Marx, Schumpeter, Polanyi, And Weber Argue That Relations Of Employment Cannot Be Completely Reduced To Explicit

2234 words - 9 pages scholars that relations of employment cannot be completely reduced to explicit contracts. Among the scholars with writers who studied this phenomenon were Durkheim, Marx, Schumpeter, Polanyi, and Weber. Capitalism refers to a market system in which the production of the commodity and the market itself are pervasive in nature. This definition includes the capital market and covers the labor markets. As a result, in such a market system, most

Max, Durkheim And Weber Essay

1753 words - 7 pages Comparison of Marx, Durkheim and Weber Sociology can easily be described as a untidy subject. As the "˜science of society and social relations' its boundaries are wide and difficult to draw. Marx, Durkheim and Weber are the major classical sociological thinkers and are often regarded as the "˜trinity' of major classical sociologists. They provide theories and arguments in order to create an understanding of our society. In comparing

Comte Durkheim And Marx Essay

1509 words - 6 pages social order. Therefore society continues on in its existence (Giddens 1993:711). Durkheims main writings were The Division of Labour in Society (1893), The Rules of the Sociological Method (1895), Suicide: A Study in Sociology (1897) and The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). (Fulcher and Scott 1999:36). Emile Durkheim died in 1917.Karl Marx was born in Trier in Germany in 1818 he studied law and then began a career in journalism