Effects of Banning Smoking Advertising
Cigarettes are some of the most abused drugs in the world and the effects associated with smoking have greatly influenced the intervention of health professionals concerning the legality of smoking advertisements. Ethical and legal issues have come up over the essence of restricting or completely banning cigarette advertising to reduce the number of affected individuals. Cigarettes have since time immemorial been established to cause a wide range of infections and diseases. The most common disease caused by cigarettes is cancer and since the drug affects smokers and non-smokers as well, there has been a widespread call to illegalize cigarette advertising.
The rationale behind banning cigarette advertising is to reduce the influence that adverts have on young and inexperienced smokers. In addition, the adverts have are believed to boost cigarette sales and lure unsuspecting victims do as to increase consumer demand. For this reason, cigarette-manufacturing companies have been using adverts to influence increased consumption without paying attention to the underlying dangers associated with the consumption of this harmful drug.
In spite of the effects associated with cigarette smoking and the dangers of influenced consumption of cigarettes, some researchers believe there is no need to ban cigarette smoking. Various reasons exist to support the legalization of cigarette advertising (Blecher 937). One of the reasons that should discourage enacting a ban on cigarette advertising is the economic gains generated by cigarette manufacturing companies, tobacco farmers and the government.
Tobacco exportation and farming is one of the most profitable businesses in the country and the world as a whole. Many farmers depend on tobacco plants to make a living and therefore a ban on cigarette advertising could negatively impact on cigarette sales and lead to reduced demand. With a reduction in cigarette demand, the farmers would be subjected to low prices because the supply in such cases would exceed the demand.
The other group that would be affected by a ban on cigarette advertising would be the cigarette manufacturing companies. The negative effects that can be experienced by these companies in case of such a ban are direct. These companies could lower their productivity and sales in case of such a ban and this could adversely affect their earnings. Once the advertisements are banned, there would be less new smokers as compared to when the adverts are operational (Cohen, Shumate, and Gold 93). This means that advertisements on cigarettes mostly affect and influence new smokers than they do to practicing smokers. For this reason, most of the smokers are influenced to remain indulging in the practice due to addiction and not the advertisements.
Banning of cigarette smoking would greatly affect the government’s revenue that is collected from different sectors. Farmers are some of the individuals who are directly and...