This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Employee Privacy Rights In The Workplace.

1416 words - 6 pages

Drug testing in the workplace is a violation of employee privacy rights. Drug testing in the workplace was founded under the idea of protecting the employer from employees that had attendance, tardiness, theft and accidents assumed to be related to drug and alcohol abuse. To protect an employee's right to privacy an employer should seek out alternatives to detecting and preventing drug and alcohol abuse in the workplace other than drug testing. Drug testing has often been found to be inaccurate and a waste of an employer's time and money. Therefore; drug testing does not protect the employer or the employee from drug and alcohol abuse in the workplace but violates the employee's right to privacy.It is easy to imagine that some human resource experts across the United States would argue that drug testing is useful and cost effective to their organizations. Executives might also say that posting the fact that the company requires pre-hire drug testing would weed out potential drug and alcohol abusers from applying for a particular position or job. Advertising that the company requires pre-hire drug testing could though weed out potential quality employees as well. Some people might say that only small portions of the population are actual abusers of drugs and alcohol. If all businesses were required to perform pre-hire and random drug tests, how effective would drug testing be at detecting drug and alcohol abusers? Because drug testing is often inaccurate as I will point later the pre-hire drug testing would not be effective.In the example below I show that not all on the job accidents are related to employees who may or may not abuse drugs or alcohol. Many corporations spend millions of dollars each year for pre-hire and random drug testing. These costs are incurred without any legitimate proof that shows that the drug testing has been cost affective to the organization. Information about loss of employee productivity, absenteeism, accident rates and employee theft has been provided to companies by the drug testing promoter's.Studies conducted show that pre-employment drug testing couldn't predict on the job accidents or injuries. Worker's testing positive at the time of hire were no more likely to be in an accident. Also for reference out of 213 post office workers given post-accident drug tests, 96 percent tested negative. The four percent that tested positive was for marijuana of which did not contribute to the cause the accident. (ACLU, 1999)Drug and alcohol abusers over the years have found creative ways to get around drug testing. They have been known to falsify urinalysis tests by supplying borrowed urine or by diluting the specimen. There are also many products available on the market today that claim to cleanse the body of the toxins that would produce a positive test result for illicit drugs. Some products include quick clean pills, natural herbs or medicines, and cleanse the body kits. Web based venders that sell drug tests are also...

Find Another Essay On Employee Privacy Rights in the Workplace.

Employe Privacy Rights in the Workplace

2011 words - 8 pages websites and email.What a great deal of people do not realize is that their rights of privacy do not extend into the workplace. You receive a very limited amount of privacy in the workplace, if any. Most employers monitor employees for these reasons and more: safety, security, employee productivity and performance, and legal liability issues, to make sure that they do not get sued.Employee monitoring inside the workplace is a wonderful thing, as

"Employee Privacy": The risks and complications involved on the issue of employee privacy in the workplace

1364 words - 5 pages success. Because of this, there has to be some level of privacy at the workplace in order to preserve the welfare and moral of the workers.An article in "The Business Lawyer" by Charles E. Frayer entitled Employee privacy and Internet monitoring: Balancing workers' rights and dignity with legitimate management interests explores both the moral and legal aspects of employee privacy when it comes to Internet use. With regard to the employee's moral

Rights of Privacy in the Private Sector Workplace

2481 words - 10 pages Employee Privacy Rights: Limitations to Monitoriing ?Companies are intruding more deeply into the lives of employees, and even though corporate intentions may be benign, the risk of backlash is growing.? ?Lee Smith (1) With the rise of advanced technology, there arose the threat of surveillance and privacy invasion in the workplace. An employee, by the very nature of the employment relationship, must be subject to some level of

How the Growth of Electronic Monitoring Has Changed Employee Expectations of Privacy in the Workplace

1294 words - 5 pages The use of the internet for personal pursuits in the workplace has seen phenomenal growth over the last quarter century. Along with this growth, employers and employees alike have used the internet as a tool to increase profit, manage time and facilitate communications. However, such technological advancement has its issues. The problem investigated is how the growth of electronic monitoring has changed employee expectations of privacy in the

Online Monitoring: A Threat to Employee Privacy in the Wired Workplace

1362 words - 5 pages their employees' ability to exercise their autonomy.Employees' right to privacy and autonomy in the workplace, however, remains a murky area of the law. Although evaluating where to draw the line between employee rights and employer powers is often a duty that falls to the judicial system, the courts have shown little willingness to intrude on employers' exercise of control over their computer networks. Federal law provides few guidelines related

Technology and Employee Privacy Rights

1585 words - 6 pages voice mail, and when employees are using the Internet in the workplace. Such monitoring is practically unregulated. Therefore, unless the company guidelines specifically states otherwise your employer will be allowed to listen, watch and read most of your workplace communications. “Employee privacy rights include an employee’s personal information and activities at work. Companies in the private sector, and not working on a government contract, do

Employers Rights When It Comes to Workplace Privacy

1235 words - 5 pages The article named “Workplace Privacy” discussed the topic in vivid detail while supplying logical statistics and claims. The debate is about supporters, who want rights in the workplace, as well as the critics, who believe it is important to monitor the workplace in order to eliminate potential problems. A poll was conducted in July of 2007; the results showed that nearly half of employers monitor workers emails alone. Additional evidence

Is Workplace Control Of Drugs More Important Than Protecting Employee Privacy?

1125 words - 5 pages mission statements for companies are almost endless with various intentions at stake. When workers are tested for drugs this adds a complex variable into the situation, which also leads to an ethical dilemma. Measuring an employee's performance is often a hard thing to do, when efficiency isn't measured with tangible numbers. Managing the quandary between employees rights to privacy and the employers entitlement to wellbeing, forms a grey area

Privacy in the Workplace

2493 words - 10 pages established we look at actions taken by both the employee and the employer. We view the person’s natural right to privacy at the workplace. People choices and actions are greatly affected when they know they are being monitored in a positive or negative manner. Employees don’t have the chance to make any decisions or choices without being monitored which basically violates their natural rights. Yet the employer has the freedom to do as they please

Privacy in the Workplace

1612 words - 6 pages performed in a way that is an efficient means to achieve its purpose. 3) The intrusion is performed with the least intrusive means that are available to achieve its purpose. 4) The resulting intrusion into the employee’s privacy is not so severe as to outweigh the value of achieving its purpose”. Adhering to this standard would create a baseline for all corporate policies that otherwise ‘dick-dance’ around employee privacy rights. And yet

Privacy in the Employee Handbook

1501 words - 6 pages privacy policy. These areas include: the privacy rights issues that are addressed, the company's position in response to privacy rights issues, privacy protections to limit the company's liability, privacy protections to enhance employee motivation and productivity, ethical considerations and different ways to address state, federal, and international laws.What to IncludeEmployees have a reasonable expectation of privacy within the workplace

Similar Essays

Employee Privacy Rights In The Workplace

1403 words - 6 pages productivity and minimize losses, but this can be done without being invasive to the employees' privacy rights. So, employers are using a strategy, such as monitoring to ensure productivity in the workplace. According to the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986, "an employer can monitor their employee to ensure adequate job performance and supervise customer contacts." The most common form of an invasion, to employee privacy rights is

Employee Privacy Rights In The Workplace

1754 words - 7 pages employees into doing something they do not favor.Here are a few ways an employee can protect his privacy rights in the workplace. If an email needs to be sent to another coworker, and it is private, it can be sent via a Blackberry using a Personal Identification Number (PIN) method. The PIN is signed to a client by sim cards and sent through the Blackberry to another Blackberry. The email will be sent directly to the Blackberry, instead of an email

Employee Privacy Rights In The Workplace

1754 words - 7 pages your job. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 3, 239-252. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from EBSCOhost.Macdonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 235-241.Pagnatarro, M. A. (2001). Genetic discrimination and the workplace: Employee's right to privacy v. employer's need to know. American Business Law Journal, 39, 139-186. Retrieved March 8

Employee Privacy Rights In The Workplace

1419 words - 6 pages situation and І feel strongly that if we began to initiate this process, а change will be made.ReferencesArmour, Stephanie (2005) Trend: You smoke? You're fired! USA Today, News, p1-13Lichtash, Ayelet (2004) Inappropriate use of Email and the Internet in the Workplace: The Arbitration Picture, Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 59 Issue 1, 11p, 1c, p26Mishra, Jitendra M.; Crampton Suzanne M. (2006) Employee observing: privacy in the